rec.autos.simulators

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

Antoine Renau

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Antoine Renau » Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:00:00




>> >Just which French-English dictionary are you using?!!!

>> The one he wrote, of course!!  ;)

>> Cheers!

>> Marc

>No no, the french "canadian" dictionary. Very distinct, and don't you
>forget that!

Now that one's funny (although your other post wasn't)!  One good
post, one bad, you're not yet in my killfile.  Hope you can be as
entertaining in future posts as you've been with this one.

A. Renault

SimRaci

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by SimRaci » Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:00:00

I appreciate you thinking that at least one of my posts was funny,
but I assure you I didn't write the above statements.

Cheers!

Marc J. Nelson

Antoine Renau

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Antoine Renau » Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:00:00


I know Marc, I was replying to Kel.  I should have taken your name out
to avoid any confusion...  Sorry!

A. Renault

Antoine Renau

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Antoine Renau » Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:00:00



I'm confused...  Does that include me?

Could happen to anyone...

That's a good question.  Did you ever visit Quebec?  I don't mean by
that visiting relatives in an anglophone part of Quebec, but have you
ever really lived amongst quebeckers for a few days?  You'd realize
they are indeed different from people in other parts of Canada.  And
I'm not speaking about language issues here.  It's really hard to
point out every aspect of what distinguishes us from the rest of
Canada, but I'll resume the "feel" I get when we're discussing such
issues here:  Anglophone canadians are living (more or less)"the
american way", and we are living a little more like europeans.  That
may not be what you feel, but it's the opinion of many of us.

That's one of the reasons we feel threatened while we're inside this
beautiful country of yours.  You're always acting like you're diong us
a big favor when you're doing something to help preserve the french
culture in america.  You should take pride in it, not bashing at us as
the sole reason you're doing it.  Being a multicultural country is a
huge advantage you have and yet you don't seem to realize.

This can't go unanswered.  Do you realize that probably more than 75%
of the people here speak english?  Maybe not as good as you do but we
see so much english TV, hear so much english music, not to mention the
internet wich is 99.9% anglophone content, and we also have mandatory
english courses beginning in uh...  3rd grade I think and lasts until
we graduate from high school, how could we not speak or at least
understand english...  You wanna do business?  Need to speak english,
at least if you want to export...  A lot of our universities and
hospitals are anglophone, and all services here are available in
french or english...  Can you really say you're doing the same
efforts?  Well, I'll agree we don't really have the choice so we
cannot take credit for doing it, but anyways, I don't see how getting
lost in Quebec could be any harder for an anglophone than for a
francophone anywhere in canada...  I'm not sure but I think you've
misjudged this one...  BTW, do you speak french?  See my point...

Of course there will always be an emotionnal part in this debate.  We
strongly feel we're not really part of Canada, and that might have to
do with the canadian constitution being imposed on us without our
consent, but I really think there are some separatists that do have
valid points.  Are you saying we're all a bunch of uneducated fools
who have nothing else to do than criticize erverything we can?  I
presume you're not really assuming that.  The bigger problem is
misinformation that is carried in a large part by politicians, on both
sides.  I don't think you should agree with me, I know you'll never
do.  But at least you have to recognize that we'reno more stupid than
you are, and we all want what's best for our families and friends.

Yes but we're not asking for anything!  We just want to have enough
power to protect our language and culture.  You don't have the
slightest idea how hard it is to keep those alive when you're
surrounded by hundreds of millions of anglophones with a strong
culture, wich has assimilated many other cultures in america...

I know about spam, I'm not putting my real e-mail too...  Shame on me!
Sorry for that one, but "I just had a spur of the moment beef", sounds
familiar? Eheh... ;o)

A. Renault

John Walla

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by John Walla » Fri, 19 Dec 1997 04:00:00



>That's one of the reasons we feel threatened while we're inside this
>beautiful country of yours.  You're always acting like you're diong us
>a big favor when you're doing something to help preserve the french
>culture in america.  You should take pride in it, not bashing at us as
>the sole reason you're doing it.  Being a multicultural country is a
>huge advantage you have and yet you don't seem to realize.

The problem is that the anglophones do not see where is the advantage
for them and, in short, there is none.

We have a similar situation here in Scotland with Gaelic language,
which is spoken by an ever decreasing number of people, primarily in
the remote NW regions. This is now becoming a burden on the economy to
a certain extent, because the language doesn't actually benefit the
country at all, is supported for a small percentage of the people for
reasons of history and nationalism, but is paid for by the populous as
a whole.

Personally I do not want to pay higher taxes so that a very small
percentage of people can go to special schools and be educated in a
language that benefits neither them nor the country as a whole. In a
democracy I have to respect their right to desire such an education,
but for the same reason they also have to respect that if the majority
do not want to pay for it then they cannot demand it.

I'm not too au fait with the situation in Canada, other than that the
Quebecois are "different" from the rest of Canada in outlook, national
feeling, or whatever. Certainly as it pertains to Scotland I see
little value in it, but it's rather difficult to put common sense in
front of political correctness and challenge anyone who has siezed the
m***high ground of "protecting nationanl heritage". Not all heritage
is worthy of protection.

If people really want to learn another language and benefit the
country into the bargain, they'd be far better off learning German,
French or Japanese - even if they never left the country (as is the
case with Gaelic), the tourists would be a lot happier :)

Cheers!
John

Kel

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Kel » Fri, 19 Dec 1997 04:00:00


> don't remember our rank exactly but I remember that french sits
> amongst the most spoken languages like english, chinese, spanish,
> japanese, german and maybe I'm forgetting some...  Anyway the more of
> these you can understand and/or speak then the more economical power
> you have (assuming you have a quality product to offer).

So what quality product does french language have to offer? Other than
tourism.

Have you even researched how much it costs the rest of Canada to simply
put "french" on every label on everything we buy, and french on all
signs? Yet in Que. I see mostly french only signs and lables and no
english. I respect your culture and language, but to demand the rest of
us should (by law) have french and english on almost everything we buy
or look at is hipocritical, when Que. doesn't follow suit. This costs us
taxpayers a whole bunch.

Antoine Renau

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Antoine Renau » Sat, 20 Dec 1997 04:00:00



>The problem is that the anglophones do not see where is the advantage
>for them and, in short, there is none.

I'm not sure what you mean...  Are you saying they are right when they
say there is no advantage?

Our situation is different, as French is a language spoken by a large
part of the earth's population...  Many european, south-american and
african countries have french as one of their official languages.  I
don't remember our rank exactly but I remember that french sits
amongst the most spoken languages like english, chinese, spanish,
japanese, german and maybe I'm forgetting some...  Anyway the more of
these you can understand and/or speak then the more economical power
you have (assuming you have a quality product to offer).

We're not asking anyone to pay for us, we're just asking them to give
us the power to protect our language and culture.  That can be done
many ways, but it has to be discussed.  How can we discuss on the
basis of facts that aren't aknowledged by one of the parties?

You're gonna have to work hard if you want quebeckers to agree with
that...  Here culture is everything, and maybe you think it's not
worth it but we don't, and that's what matters...

French...  You said it...  We do speak english and french here, tha
could be considered a good think in your book?

I'm not sure I understand 100% of what you're saying, heck I don't
even know if you're on my side...  I think I need to rest... ;o)

A. Renault

Barton Spencer Brow

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Barton Spencer Brow » Sat, 20 Dec 1997 04:00:00

You know what would REALLY make some people happy? If you took this
highly interesting but completely off-topic exchange of social
commentary into private email or an appropriate newsgroup (being of
Scots ancestry myself, I know of several such NGs on the net).

Bart Brown

John Walla

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by John Walla » Tue, 23 Dec 1997 04:00:00



>I'm not sure what you mean...  Are you saying they are right when they
>say there is no advantage?

Yes. The English speaking people think there is no advantage for them
in paying for the continuation of Gaelic, and I suspect the situation
is the same in Canada with respect to French language.

Doesn't matter IMO. If I want my child to speak Spanish then I myself
have to pay for special lessons - I can't expect the rest of the
population of the UK to help out. Why should they, the vast majority
do not benefit. So too with French in Canada - if a minority are
keeping alive a language that gives little or no benefit to the
nation, and in fact increases costs and hinders relations and trade
between French and English speaking areas, it's difficult to make a
case for the majority to pay for that.

And assuming that you have or have a target to have a sizable trade
with countries speaking that language. I'd guess the majority of
Canada's trade is with Japan and USA, so perhaps Japanese would be a
better option?

How does that protection come about? Through increased teaching,
increased use of French language media or whatever. Whichever way is
applied it costs money, and that money comes from the government
through taxation so everyone pays for it - including the English
speaking majority who don't want it. Unless you introduce a special
"French tax" to finance this (which in itself would cause howls of
protest in any democratic society) then it has to be seen as unfair.

Now you're not being democratic. What matters is not what the
Quebecois want, but what the majority of Canadians wants. It's their
money that will pay for it.

No. It's good in Europe because the French and Germans are our
neighbours and we have a lot of trade with them. Here all children are
taught English as a first language, and French and/or German as a
second language. Teaching French or German as a primary language would
be wrong, and that is, as far as I understand, how it is done in
Quebec. It's a bit like Scotland deciding to teach Chinese in our
schools. We would be able to talk to each other fine, but it would
cause problems for our neighbours and really be of little use to us in
everyday life.

I'm not on any side. I can see both sides equally through the similar
situation we have in Scotland, and the only "side" I am against is
anyone that cannot take into account the views of the person they are
arguing with.

Cheers!
John

Antoine Renau

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by Antoine Renau » Thu, 25 Dec 1997 04:00:00



>Now you're not being democratic. What matters is not what the
>Quebecois want, but what the majority of Canadians wants. It's their
>money that will pay for it.

I really don't agree on that particular aspect.  But I can understand
your opinion;  you probably don't see us as two peoples living
together, so then it's obvious that the voice of the majority rules.
I realize that I am biased, mostly because I believe that we (the
french canadians) are a people and what matters is what the majority
of my people thinks.  It can be argued that we've stopped being a
people when we were defeated by the english armies, but of course
that's not the way I see it.  Anyway no one's gonna have to pay for us
if (in time) we get our own country.  You have to realize that
language is a provincial jurisdiction, and in terms of taxes we
quebeckers pay more than anyone in any other province.  Part of that
money is used to promote our culture, but that's our right.  When we
elect a government in Quebec, that's democracy.  And when that
_elected_ government uses our money to promote french, that's also
democracy.  The canadian government doesn't spend that much money on
promoting french, the only reason they do is because they've signed an
agreement with our people stating that all public services would
always be available in both our official languages, and they have to
live with that.  As for francophones living outside Quebec, I cannot
realisticly say that they have the right to ask for french schools or
whatever they want, because they've decided to live in provinces that
are 99% anglophone and they have to adapt.  If someday I wanna live in
Japan, then I'll learn japanese.  But here in Quebec people massively
speak french.  Millions of us do.  We don't feel like we're "a
minority" like you state in your post, because we speak the language
of the majority _inside Quebec_.  You could again argue that it
doesn't matter if you're a majority inside a minority group, but then
it all gets back to the fact that in our opinion the population of
Quebec are a people, distinct from the people of Canada.  I'm not
asking you to recognize that, but I just want you to know our side of
things.  Maybe if my english was a bit better I'd be a little more
convincing...  Anyway, thanks for keeping an open mind!

Sorry for those who think this is off-topic.  Of course it is, but
hey!  We are entitled to some extras since our boy is formula one's
world champion! (wether you like it or not!)

A. Renault

JulianDat

Another Classic Ymenard Screwup....

by JulianDat » Thu, 25 Dec 1997 04:00:00

John.....

Merry Christmas over there!!!!; ) Don't get hung over.. hehe.. ; )

take care

Julian Data

------------------------------------------------------------------
              Hungry for NEWSGROUPS??? USE feedME.ORG            
         Read and Post to 30,000 groups through feedME.ORG        
     FREE  FREE  FREE  http://www.feedME.ORG  FREE  FREE  FREE    
------------------------------------------------------------------


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.