Because going from 85 to 37 does not compute. If 85 is your Windows
refresh rate and you are playing NR2002 at a different resolution, you
may still be getting 75 in game, which would then drop to 37 if it can't
keep up.
"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash
> >On my own, practicing at WG, I get around 60-75 FPS in 800x600 Eldred,
> >that's with a 1.4 and a V5, I hate to turn down the details too much so
> >I went with the 8x6 resolution instead
> >In last night's Dega race I had anything between 35 and 55 FPS, and even
> >the smoke didn't affect me too badly, and I had plenty of opp to notice
> >:-)
> There has to be something wrong with my system. I was getting 37 fps at
> 1024x768(D3D).
> Detail levels: low/medium/minimal/low. Drawing distance 32%, opponents drawn
> 23/8, NO quality effects, smoke on, other on.
> I changed it to OpenGL, and it dropped to 20 fps.
> I changed it to 800 by 600(d3d), and got about 75 fps. Same detail levels as
> before(low, minimal, etc.). Others with 'lesser' systems seem to be able to
> run MANY more details than I can. This sucks...
> Eldred
> --
> Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
> A friend of mine is involved in a fund-raiser walk-a-thon for research to cure
> *** cancer. If you can, please go to my homepage and see how to make a
> donation. Thank you.
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.