> No, my post didn't help much. But hey, yours was stating the blindingly
> obvious, so what makes that so earth shattering?
> My view that NL is better than N3, is chiefly that a) the AI have more
> balls, and, b) the tyre wear/fuel consumption part of the equation more
> accurately reflects the way real cars behave/behaved then. There are
> problems, but none that a couple of clever people (not me), could sort out.
> It may be the same game engine, but the parameters have been shifted. This
> is all of course IMHO.
> Steve
& more aggressive when you try putting them a lap down. Much more so
than N3, although I like that title too. Just prefer NL, myself. And,
on my machine at least, they do not sound the same so I'm puzzled by
that observation.
Tire wear also makes things a lot more interesting. A few times I've
managed to find online races to get into, I've found many folks try
driving these like they do in N3. I just let them go, knowing they're
gonna have to pit before the end of a 10% race. I keep a pace where I
can *just* make it on tires, and beat them easily. Has happened at both
Alabama and Atlanta. Kinda like an automotive chess match, ya gotta
*think*.
--
//Chuck Kandler #70
//ChuckK or KS70 on Won.net
//K&S Racing
//http://www.racesimcentral.net/
//The box said "Windows 0x5h or better", so I installed LINUX!