rec.autos.simulators

> > It sickens me to see the liberal Europeans surrender (like the French)
to
> > the media and believe the lies propagated against President Bush, the
only
> > leader who has the guts to stand up to Terror.

>     Which reminds me, how's his anti missile missle anti anti missile anti
> system coming?

> Mitch

> .

>>> something like:

>>> >It sickens me to see the liberal Europeans surrender (like the French)
>>> >to
>>> >the media and believe the lies propagated against President Bush, the
>> only
>>> >leader who has the guts to stand up to Terror.

>>> It sickens me to see the gullible Americans surrender (like 47% of
>>> them) to the media and believe the lies George has propagated against
>>> President Hussein, the only leader who had the guts to stand up to
>>> American oil industry.

>>> :-P
>>> --
>>> - Jussi Koukku -

>> We have something called "terrorist mommies" here in the U.S. They are a
>> target group Bush has done a great job of scaring into voting for him.
>> His
>> three years of constantly uttering "weapons of mass destruction" and
>> "terrorists" have scared these gullible soccer moms into thinking their
>> little brats are going to be blown up any minute now.

>> --
>> David G Fisher

> I believe he has the West Brothers working flat out on the project ;-) it
> should be ready by 2011.

> > > It sickens me to see the liberal Europeans surrender (like the French)
> to
> > > the media and believe the lies propagated against President Bush, the
> only
> > > leader who has the guts to stand up to Terror.

> >     Which reminds me, how's his anti missile missle anti anti missile anti
> > system coming?

> I believe he has the West Brothers working flat out on the project ;-) it
> should be ready by 2011.

> And launched from the Lotus Team Transporter no doubt.

>> They are called security Mom's and they only have to do with GWB in
>> so much they know he'll protect them (as much as possible) from
>> future terrorists attacks and know Kerry does not and will not based
>> on his 35+ years of anti-war rhetoric.  This group is a metaphor and
>> is not a target of the Bush camp but rather a logical grouping of
>> people with common sense and a firm grasp of reality that realize
>> GWB is the ONLY choice for President in 2004.

> Oh come on, Mitch! The terrorist threat is nothing like as bad as the
> propaganda would have us all believe.

> It's all about the far right inventing monsters and promising to
> protects us from them. It's the oldest trick in the book. It's what
> made religion so popular.

> As an example, Iranians will say that the US called Saddam our friend, gave
> Saddam chemical weapons, and helped Saddam use those weapons against their
> people. All 100% true.

> The US then turns around and calls Saddam a madman a handful of years later.
> Bush in his speaches
> scares the most gullible and uninformed of the American people (and there
> are a lot of them -- 83% of Americans couldn't even find Iraq on a map even
> though the first civilization began there 4,000 years ago) by pointing out
> how Saddam used chemical weapons, but conveniently doesn't remind people in
> those same speaches how *we* gave them to him, encouraged him to use them,
> and assisted him in using them against Iranian soldiers. That makes him and
> us, f**ken liars. Every single time he made that reference to Saddam in all
> those speaches, and
> didn't mention his daddy's and Rumsfeld's help, he was *lying*.

> David G Fisher---From the only country in the world that ever slaughtered
> 250,000 innocent civilians with WMD, and then danced in the streets

> > And (of the Muslim attacks you listed) Muslims will say that those are
just
> > responses to attacks such as each of the 10,000+ bombs and missles that
they
> > view as individual terrorist attacks on a country like Iraq launched by
the
> > US which just killed 1000,000 of their people. They will say the US has
been
> > terrorizing their people for decades.

> > As an example, Iranians will say that the US called Saddam our friend,
gave
> > Saddam chemical weapons, and helped Saddam use those weapons against
their
> > people. All 100% true.

> > The US then turns around and calls Saddam a madman a handful of years
later.
> > Bush in his speaches
> > scares the most gullible and uninformed of the American people (and
there
> > are a lot of them -- 83% of Americans couldn't even find Iraq on a map
even
> > though the first civilization began there 4,000 years ago) by pointing
out
> > how Saddam used chemical weapons, but conveniently doesn't remind people
in
> > those same speaches how *we* gave them to him, encouraged him to use
them,
> > and assisted him in using them against Iranian soldiers. That makes him
and
> > us, f**ken liars. Every single time he made that reference to Saddam in
all
> > those speaches, and
> > didn't mention his daddy's and Rumsfeld's help, he was *lying*.

> > David G Fisher---From the only country in the world that ever
slaughtered
> > 250,000 innocent civilians with WMD, and then danced in the streets

> Well said, sir!

> The truth is some of the***-less wonders in this group get off on the
> projection of US military might. It's like a good ***o film to them!

> Three guesses who they will vote for and why.

>I agree, of course not.  Also, had the Iraqis used WMD on the US and
>were trying to secure Nukes for deployment in the future I'm sure the US
>government would have just cause to do something about it.  We're just
>not sure whether that is true though.