> >> Oh, my god! Why are you apologizing?? Your review was excellent and to the
> point. You have no obligation to mention any of the positive things about a sim
> in a review (of course it's common to do so) >>
> What are YOU talking about?! What is a review intended to do, in your opinion?
> I think most people would agree that the purpose of a review is to inform
> readers about all that's good and bad in a sim so they can make an informed
> purchase. A review which only covers the gripes is not a very informative
> review, particularly if there are positives that aren't being mentioned. It
> serves no real purpose. Any game out there right now could receive a review
> which only harps on the negatives and avoids the positives. Even games that
> are really great and well-respected could be made to look like turkeys if
> reviewers only griped about flaws. If the reviewer is truly serving the
> reader, the review will try to portray the game as accurately as possible. If
> that means the game is more negative than positive, so be it. If it means the
> game is more positive than negative, so be it. The point is, the reviewer
> should be trying very hard to be as informative as possible, or why bother
> writing a review?
let you? Her original review was spot on as far as many are concerned.
Looks like another reviewer bites the dust and joins the ranks of the
"not worth taking much notice of". The only thing good to say about CPR
fearless sector!