rec.autos.simulators

>>>TIME Magazine would probably pick "Pole Position".

>>No, TIME magazine would find that GP2 had a huge number of
>>votes, so they'd remove it from the list altogether.
>>(based on what they did with the person of the century)

>Wandering way of topic here...

>Well, I'm not familiar with the particular sequence of events at TIME,
>so I would assume TIME forgot to specify anything in the requirements
>that indicated a requirement that the person be "positive", and so a
>lot of people voted for one of the most visible noted people in
>twentieth century history--often considered an embodiment of evil,
>known for his manipulation of the masses through the media.

>And so TIME was forced to explicitly make Bill Gates ineligible for the
>vote.

>Adrian.

> And so TIME was forced to explicitly make Bill Gates ineligible for the
> vote.

>> Well, I'm not familiar with the particular sequence of events at TIME,
>> so I would assume TIME forgot to specify anything in the requirements
>> that indicated a requirement that the person be "positive", and so a
>> lot of people voted for one of the most visible noted people in
>> twentieth century history--often considered an embodiment of evil,
>> known for his manipulation of the masses through the media.

>> And so TIME was forced to explicitly make Bill Gates ineligible for the
>> vote.

>LOL.  Now that was funny.  Lots of hilarious posts today.  Everybody must be
>in a good
>mood.  Did you all get laid on Valentine's Day?

>Dave Ewing