rec.autos.simulators

Here We Go Again

Jo Hels

Here We Go Again

by Jo Hels » Thu, 09 Mar 2000 04:00:00



You mean they hired Ferrari?  Her last appearance in a production? :-)

JoH  

========================================
Jo Helsen    EDP Operations BF Belgium

========================================

David G Fishe

Here We Go Again

by David G Fishe » Fri, 10 Mar 2000 04:00:00



> > The producer never downngraded it, and he never would.

> > R.a.s. already has, based on nothing.

> Nonsense, we're discussing it, period. That's one of the main
> reasons for this ng. Most here dislike troll posts as in "Anything
> UbiSoft makes, is...", but "what...if" discussions are very
> entertaining.

> > You've probably only seen the distorted screenshots and video clips of
> > F12000 which were taken from the replay mode.

> Distorted, as in somebody screwed up all screenshots made of F1 2000?
> If the cars look more realistic in the final sim, I'm the first to buy
> it.
> But I doubt it (I hope that is a legal expression of oppinion).

What I mean is that the screenshots were taken during replay mode. The pics
have the fisheye lens effect which distorts the cars.

- Show quoted text -

I'm not putting down GP3, and I don't even remember any posts of yours which
I thought were unfairly criticizing F1 2000, so why are we debating? It's
others here at r.a.s. who have been unfair IMO.

David G Fisher

DjFI

Here We Go Again

by DjFI » Fri, 10 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Yeah... david wasn't puting down gp3...he's stating the facts.  Read the fact
sheet at alphaf1.com under "features to not be added".  It's a pretty long
list.  And missing internet play is a huge sales factor these days.

DjFIL





> > > The producer never downngraded it, and he never would.

> > > R.a.s. already has, based on nothing.

> > Nonsense, we're discussing it, period. That's one of the main
> > reasons for this ng. Most here dislike troll posts as in "Anything
> > UbiSoft makes, is...", but "what...if" discussions are very
> > entertaining.

> > > You've probably only seen the distorted screenshots and video clips of
> > > F12000 which were taken from the replay mode.

> > Distorted, as in somebody screwed up all screenshots made of F1 2000?
> > If the cars look more realistic in the final sim, I'm the first to buy
> > it.
> > But I doubt it (I hope that is a legal expression of oppinion).

> What I mean is that the screenshots were taken during replay mode. The pics
> have the fisheye lens effect which distorts the cars.

> > > I'm looking forward to GP3 as much as anyone, but it also will be
> missing
> > > some very key features.

> > > '98 season.

> > > One car model for all teams.

> > > No TCP/IP internet play. Hotlap replays are a bore.

> > By your own standards, you shouldn't put down a sim before it's
> > released...
> > ;^)

> > Or is it only "putting it down", if other people mention possible short-
> > commings?

> I'm not putting down GP3, and I don't even remember any posts of yours which
> I thought were unfairly criticizing F1 2000, so why are we debating? It's
> others here at r.a.s. who have been unfair IMO.

> David G Fisher


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.