No, it is a terrific motherboard!!! I get incredible results with it. Every
little tweak program I try doesn't do anything, because it is already
running at peak performance. 4x works like a charm.
> That motherboard really is bad... I have one and thinking of changing
> it. It seems I can't get the AGP slot to work at more than 1X (out of a
> possible 4X); that's not mentionning the couple of instabilies caused by
> the Via Appollo chipset...
> > I have the follwing system
> > PIII-733
> > Asus P3V4X
> > 256mb PC133 SDRAM
> > Intel Pro 100 NIC
> > Philips Acoustic Edge Sound Card
> > Win98SE
> > Logitech Formula Force wheel and pedals
> > I swapped out my VD5 and installed a GeForce DDR (Asus V6800 Pure)
> > from my wife's PC. I lost the use of FSAA but my frames per second
> > nearly tripled.
> > With FULL details, 42 cars (25 cars drawn ahead), and Force Feedback
> > enabled, I maintain a solid 30fps with the GeForce in OpenGL.
> > As much as I love FSAA I will live without it to play N4 :-)
> > Cheers
> > >Hi all,
> > >Well, my patience was finally rewarded when one of my colleagues from
> > >work returned from the USA yesterday with a copy of N4 safely packed
> > >away for me. Unfortunately I had to wait until this morning until I
> > >could get my hands on it but it was well worth the wait.
> > >I have only so far raced a few short races around Daytona, New
> > >Hampshire and Atlanta but it already has me well and truly hooked.
> > >Just a few questions about performance. I am running the sim on a
> > >PIII600, 128mb, V5 system so am having to make a lot of sacrifices to
> > >get a playable performance. So far I have only raced with 20 ai cars
> > >and have lots of the graphics turned off or way down. Can anybody with
> > >a similar system give me some pointers on the settings I should try on
> > >the V5 to eke out a little more speed.
> > >Would picking up a GeForce card afford any increase in frame rate with
> > >the current CPU or would that be a false economy.
> > >I am currently running at 800x600x16, I did try 640x480x16 but this
> > >was actually slower than the higher resolution.
> > >TIA
> > >PH
> --
> Philippe "Philster" Sergerie