> Now that we have argued about the GP2 rating given in PC Gamer, they
> have reviewed Nascar2. ....strange noone has brought it up yet....
> Anyway, he (Todd Vaughn) gave it a 90% rating. I am curious what
> CONSTRUCTIVE comments people have on this review (no flaming!!). If you
> agree/disagree after reading the article, please explain exactly why you
> feel how you feel. I repeat, NO FLAMES on the game or the review, only
> logical discussion please...
> --
> Matt & Audrey Lewis
Vaughn said it correctly when he said, "NR2 doesn't look
substantintially
different from it's predecessor, but then again it didn't really need
to."
I agree with the "90%" (still a great rating), because it was not _that_
revolutionary
compared to the original. Only "world changing" games deserve much
above 92% IMO.
As it is, I think PC Gamer chould jack up their "Editors Choice" ratings
to include only
games over 90% (I think the cut off is 87%).
NR2 is a great game (bugs not withstanding -- I can't wait for the first
patch) and
deserves the "Editors Choice" Rating.
.02
Ed Pickart