rec.autos.simulators

F1 Safety ????

Kendt Eklu

F1 Safety ????

by Kendt Eklu » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 03:16:24

On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:42:47 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr


>NASCAR uses a lighting system all around a race track.  Except for road
>courses...  :\  Perhaps this is something that F1 might want to take a look at.

Yep - with all the money in F1, you'd think they could implement
something similar in a reasonable timeframe.

Condolences to the friends and family of the cornerworker.  

Kendt

Dave

F1 Safety ????

by Dave » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 03:27:37

On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:42:47 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr
Starting last year,all F1 cars have yellow and red lights in the
***pit for indicating track conditions,it is a mandatory rule.

Dave K

Mike Donnelly J

F1 Safety ????

by Mike Donnelly J » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 03:33:53

Good point(s).


> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:33:42 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr

> >Just a question that begs to be asked, wasn't it F1 that pioneered wheel
> >tethers?

> According to the announcers, if the bits that the tethers are attached
> to are torn off, the tethers do no good.  In a severe enough accident,
> NOTHING helps, and clearly this was a bad one.
> =^..^=

Mark Stah

F1 Safety ????

by Mark Stah » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 04:15:52



yeah; i don't expect that, er, person to show his face around these parts
for a few days, at least...

Lutrel

F1 Safety ????

by Lutrel » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 05:54:04

I have always felt that all road courses should have lights at every corner
that the corner worker could stand back and control from a safer distance.
Also have them connected to a main control panel for the chief flagger at
the starting line so they can control them and view what corner has warning
light on. Lights are a lot more visible than flags in wet conditions also.
This would also help during testing days as many race tracks (in US anyway)
do not use the full flagging crew (usually just a few) and some blind
corners are left without a flagger.
I don't think the electronics are that complicated or expensive compared to
the amount of money that is spent to jam more spectators in (like Sears
Point).

On the other subject of gravel traps, If the car travels into the gravel
pointed forward at slower speeds then a rough surface can slow them down
very effectively, but at faster speeds the gravel needs to be smooth
otherwise the car will bounce in the air and could tumble. If the car enters
sideways then a wheel will dig in and flip the car unless its traveling
slowly.
Its a lot like tire walls or concrete walls. A tire wall is good for forward
(90 deg)impact, but at an angle the car will get thrown into a tumble. A
concrete wall is very bad for forward impact as it has no give, but at high
angles the car slides along it and most likely wont tumble.
I would rather have more asphalt or other hard surface where the gravel
traps are.

Lutrell


> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:42:47 GMT, Mike Donnelly Jr

> >NASCAR uses a lighting system all around a race track.  Except for road
> >courses...  :\  Perhaps this is something that F1 might want to take a
look at.

> Yep - with all the money in F1, you'd think they could implement
> something similar in a reasonable timeframe.

> Condolences to the friends and family of the cornerworker.

> Kendt

David G Fishe

F1 Safety ????

by David G Fishe » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:23:23

No, I'm here. F1 fans don't*** the collective backside of their choice of
motorsport, unlike fans of another form of, er, racing.

From Atlas F1:
"Early reports in the paddock suggest that a wheel from Villeneuve's car
flew
through a photographer's station window in the fencing and hit the marshal
with fatal consequences."

It's a very freak accident if this is true. The photographers' window is
small, and the wheels are now double teathered (an improvement since last
season).

I'm glad to see that immediately following the race, from the top F1
officials on down to the drivers, they all called for improved safety
standards for the track side officials and for a thorough investigation.
They, and fans, are not making ridiculous comments such as, "It's a
dangerous sport, there's not much you can do." Or, "Either you accept the
fact that dying is a part of motor sports, or take up tennis." If they had,
I'd rip them apart with criticism. If it turns out that the worker was
killed due to gross negligence (such as in NASCAR where they still don't
require such basic safety precautions as mandatory full-faced helmets for
drivers), then F1 will deserve strong criticism and demands for changes in
management of the sport. F1 doesn't react to disaster by hiding from
inquires, avoiding changes, and conducting half-hearted investigations.

Also from Atlas F1:
"Ralf Schumacher said he and Villeneuve had been lucky they were not also
injured in the crash:

"It's only thanks to the safety level of our cars that nothing bad happened
to either of us," he said.

"After I got out of my car I had a look in the***pit of the BAR which was
almost destroyed and I was glad to know that Jacques had already stepped out
of it."

Cockpit safety standards were raised since last season, and there is already
new standards set to go into effect next season. Once again the phenomenal
safety standards of F1 allowed a driver to walk away from a tremendous
accident virtually unhurt.

They also wear full-faced helmets so their skulls aren't cracked from front
to back if their faces hit the steering wheel. Imagine that?

David G Fisher




> > Perhaps David Fisher will post an expose on how lame and outdated track
> > safety in F1 is now, but I doubt it.

> yeah; i don't expect that, er, person to show his face around these parts
> for a few days, at least...

chainbreake

F1 Safety ????

by chainbreake » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:15:24



Was it a case of the tether breaking or what the tether was attached to
disentegrating?  Big difference there.

Jerry Morelock

Mike Donnelly J

F1 Safety ????

by Mike Donnelly J » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:12:50

Good question.  And given that I don't have speedvision and Fox isn't
(apparently) showing a replay, I won't get to see it.



> > Just a question that begs to be asked, wasn't it F1 that pioneered wheel
> > tethers?  I'm certain that there will be a few questions why they failed
> > in this collision.  Then again, if sufficient force is exerted in
> > snapping a tether, then it's force that isn't being used to send an
> > object at high speed into a crowd.

> Was it a case of the tether breaking or what the tether was attached to
> disentegrating?  Big difference there.

> Jerry Morelock

Greg Cisk

F1 Safety ????

by Greg Cisk » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:33:49



Speedvision showed the Australian TV Feed not the F1 world
feed. So what I saw on Speedvision was essentially what I saw
on Fox last year. The *ONLY* thing you will get with Speedvision
is live practice, qual and races. But the much vaunted F1 world
feed (with the awesome cameras and angles) which the Europeans
get are definitely missing.

For example, there was no way that you could tell that JV rearended
Ralf from the Speedvision views. We were in a bar and it was noisy
so we couldn't hear the sound and commentary for the most part. So
we were relying on the picture only. Speedvision was extremely lacking
IMHO. About what ESPN used to do actually as they used to have the
F1 races live.

--


Mark Seer

F1 Safety ????

by Mark Seer » Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:56:37

I wonder if you would be shouting so loud, had Mikka died in Aus a few years
back. I seem to remember that it was touch and go for a while.......

MS


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.