Too easy, Goy. At least it guarantees a response to my post & makes me feel
wanted :-)
Cheers
Tony
Too easy, Goy. At least it guarantees a response to my post & makes me feel
wanted :-)
Cheers
Tony
> >> 1960s touring cars or maybe Aussie V8s anyone?
> > Did someone say the magic word ?
> Too easy, Goy. At least it guarantees a response to my post & makes me feel
> wanted :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
When Papy finally treat you, you're gonna feel lost on here, Goy :-)
> > > >> 1960s touring cars or maybe Aussie V8s anyone?
> > > > Did someone say the magic word ?
> > > Too easy, Goy. At least it guarantees a response to my post & makes me feel
> > > wanted :-)
> > Well, I respond to every post I see containing the magic word, you never
> > know...:-)
> When Papy finally treat you, you're gonna feel lost on here, Goy :-)
<mad rush of people e-mailing every sim racing company they can think
of>
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
Mikkel Gram-Hansen wrote in article rec.autos.simulators:447960 about an
ongoing physics mod including links to the webforum-threads where this
topic is discussed so I assumed that everyone here is informed about
this.
Regards
Crash
Three things:
1. there's a mere 344 messages seperating Mikkel's message from yours,
that's 10 screens of headers. Without any explicit mention of this previous
post there is not even a single link between the two.
2. Mikkel's header mentions nothing about any possible mod. "GPL physics
editing" is not something most of us know about, so unless one reads Mikkels
messages by default I assume this message was also skipped by most (as
evidenced by 1 direct reply, IMO).
3. Would it hurt to say "So if these mods Mikkel mentioned..." or "So if
these mods everyone's talking about on RSC.." ?
BTW: I thought message numbers were server dependant?
Jan.
=---
Right.
Right.
No.
Don't know.
Crash
I agree with Jan BTW, it's annoying to have such an information-free
post to start off the thread.