rec.autos.simulators

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

Mitch_

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by Mitch_ » Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:38:33

This may help.

Pasted from http://www.racesimcentral.net/

------------------------------------

Continuing research on its VA system led to a refinement - which Fujitsu
refer to as Multi-domain Vertical Alignment (MVA) technology - a year later.
The conventional mono-domain VA technology uniformly tilts the LC molecules
to display an intermediate grey scale. Because of the uniform alignment of
LC molecules, the brightness changes depending on the viewing angle. When
this type of cell is viewed from the front, the viewer sees only a part of
the light that entered the LC cell because the birefringence effect of the
tilted LC molecules is only partial for viewers from the front. If a cell in
this state is observed in the direction of the tilt, the birefringence
effect disappears and the area appears dark. On the other hand, if the cell
is observed in the direction normal to the tilt, the birefringence effect by
the LC molecules reaches the maximum, producing a high brightness.

MVA solves this problem by causing the LC molecules to angle in more than
one direction within a single cell. This is done by dividing the cell into
two or more regions - called domains - and by using protrusions on the glass
surfaces to pretilt the molecules in the desired direction. By combining
areas of molecules oriented in one direction with areas of molecules
oriented in the opposite direction, and by making the areas very small, the
brightness of the cells can be made to appear uniform over a wide range of
viewing angles.

It transpires that at least four domains are needed to balance
characteristics such as the contrast ratio, chromaticity, and brightness
over different angles, and the viewing angle of four-domain MVA-LCDs is 160o
or more, both vertically and horizontally. When they were first introduced
in late 1997 they were capable of a maximum contrast ratio of 300:1.
Improvements in light leakage subsequently improved this to 500:1.
Brightness values were similarly improved from 200 cd/m2 to 250cd/m2.
Response times are as fast as 25ms, the rise time being 15ms and the decay
time 10 ms or less. The 10ms response from white to black - which is the
most recognisable transition to human eyes - is particularly fast, making an
MVA-LCD particularly suitable for reproducing moving images.


Sting3

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by Sting3 » Fri, 06 Feb 2004 05:52:40

That is the predecessor to NR2003, by more than one iteration...

here's the evolutionary list if I recall it correctly, just FYI...

1 1995 or1996? - Nascar Racing By Papyrus on 6 floppies low RES only low
detail gfx
on CD you could run 640x480 and more "hi-res" details.  Only online was a
beta thing called "Hawaii" you called long distance to connect to a server
that hosted races, no "WEB" involved.

2  Nascar Racing2  (To race "online" but at least it was using the "web",
But you had to subscribe to a *** service)
    there was a BGN expansion pack offered too for NR2.
  There was an expansion pack for this with BGN and tracks IIRC...

*3  Nascar Racing 3 (*** service died, free service via Sierra now in it)
    There was  a Craftsman trucks expansion for NR3
 *3.5 (Nascar Legends Merely the same game as NR2 & 3 but based on the early
1970's era cars.)

4  Nascar Racing 1999 (LOL they thought they had to release something LOL)
Nascar Racing 4  (Finally the new version, new physics allowed cars to catch
air)
Nascar Racing 2002  more fixes to NR4 ended the problem (or to me the
problem) of seemingly racing on ice, once the cars tires lost grip, you were
toast,

5  Nascar Racing 2003
the Patch for NR2003 has made 2003 especially worth while since seems the
guys who know how to do it, are "modding" the he|| out of it  :P

* means arguably worth the upgrade from the earlier version, and hell yes
they argued on this group,  :)


> Yes, I did go back to the store today and buy N2003 for $9.99 and I
> downloaded all the add-ons too....

> What is NASCAR 4?  Is that newer?  Different?

> Thanks!

> Gary



>> Get it!

>> Papyrus' NR200x series is at the end of it's _commercial_ life as
>> far as new versions go.  However the latest patch opened up it's
>> guts to the point where there will be new tracks, etc... for
>> basically ever.

>> -Larry



>>> I was at Best Buy last night and saw "NASCAR 2003 Season" for $9.99
>>> Is that the full version of the game that everyone is playing and
>>> talking about.
>>> It is by Sierra.  I heard there is no 2004 coming down the road,
>>> that this series is at the end of it's life?

>>> Sorry for the stupid question, I play the Need for Speed and F1
>>> games.

pcfrea

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by pcfrea » Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:11:41

9.99 !!!  wow !!! I just paid 24.99 cnd each for the both copies I just
bought.  They had 54.99 still on the box.  I had to talk to the manager to
get the price lowered even.  9.99 Great deal,  Great Game.  get it youll
love it.

Rich

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by Rich » Sat, 07 Feb 2004 07:21:52

I wonder prompted Papy to put superspeedways on the demo of N2003?
Talledega is the fastest track to drive and I really get a speed fix with
it.
It is practically curtailing my urge to run out and buy the retail version
since I prefer driving the superspeedways anyway.
Is that extremely fast Coca-Cola track from N2002 on NK3?
If it is, I just might have to cough up $$....lol


> 9.99 !!!  wow !!! I just paid 24.99 cnd each for the both copies I just
> bought.  They had 54.99 still on the box.  I had to talk to the manager to
> get the price lowered even.  9.99 Great deal,  Great Game.  get it youll
> love it.


> > I was at Best Buy last night and saw "NASCAR 2003 Season" for $9.99
> > Is that the full version of the game that everyone is playing and
talking
> > about.
> > It is by Sierra.  I heard there is no 2004 coming down the road, that
this
> > series is at the end of it's life?

> > Sorry for the stupid question, I play the Need for Speed and F1 games.

MadDAW

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by MadDAW » Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:08:23

Now that's not a reference you see everyday.  :)

MadDAWG

Robert Nielse

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by Robert Nielse » Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:40:57



Couldn't help it, dude.  Saw a comedian on Comedy Central the night I
wrote the reply...(the ventriloquist with the purple dummy and the
"jalapeno on the stick")...Can't remember his name (the comedian, that
is....), and when he put the jalapeno dummy away, he did the "S'alright?  
S'alright!  S'OK?  S'OK!" bit......

Bob

Robert Nielse

stupid N2003 question, sorry...

by Robert Nielse » Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:45:38

Never mind....just found it....Jeff Dunham is the guy's name....and he's
a RIOT!!  Him and that stupid Peanut....and, of course...Jose....the
jalapeno....ON A STICK....;p

Bob


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.