rec.autos.simulators

N3 Truck release date

Skotty Flyn

N3 Truck release date

by Skotty Flyn » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Am I correct in concluding that the rumor about the patch only
involves the online aspect of not being able to openly play/display
daytona and other add-on tracks?
We will still be able to race these tracks online as people are doing
right now wont we?
Their not also trying to kill us from using daytona and other tracks
offline as well are they? I sure as hell hope not.

>Speaking of WON.net and they/Papy coalition not allowing Daytona to be
>openly played/displayed on the game servers with the patch......

>But did you know that this goes for *ANY* track as well? Not throwing any
>stones, just passing on some additional information, hehe.

>Anyways, I've tried Heartland Park, Laguna Seca, Pocono and others, that
>came from ICR2, N2 or N99. None of those tracks will appear in the race list
>if you run them. Apparently there's some kind of "kill filter" being used by
>either Won or Papy, so that if you use *ANY* track that did not come with
>N3, then nobody will be able to see it, or know it's there, unless you
>spread it by word of mouth, such as by setting up the IP game method, hehe.

>Basically, I think that sucks, but then I guess Papy/Won have their reasons.
>I just thought it was be mighty nice to run the old tracks from the old
>sims, with N3. But then, I guess they think that would kill their sales of
>the Truck patch, if they would allow people to bring over Flemington,
>Heartland Park, I-70, etc, over to N3 and use online. Sounding like it boils
>down to the mighty dollar ruling the world.

>I'm not against them selling their products and making money, but hey, what
>we already bought, we should still be able to use, even if it happens to
>work with a newer version of a game.

>As it stands, we have to wait for the Truck add-on, the Goody's Dash add-on,
>the ARCA add-on, the TPTCC (if the Pits sells them the rights, hehe;)
>add-on, the weekend warrior local short track saturday night add-on, and on
>and on.

>There's so many add-ons that Papy is having to make to keep us all happy,
>that it will be N8 by the time they get it all done probably, hehe. That's
>not saying that they will ever make any of those add-ons, but hey, we can
>dream. But if they don't, they should at least give us a little creative
>freedom to create our own add-ons. I guess if quake2 players are allowed to
>do it, with the blessings of ID Software Inc even, then maybe Papy will let
>us do it.  ;o)

>Destin

>P.S. If Papy really wanted to make some big $$$, all they gotta do is put
>out a "Tracks Add-On" for N3, and even N2/N99 users, that features dozens,
>hopefully 100 or more, of various real life tracks from around the country,
>and even the world. Tracks like Lanier here in Georgia, used by Hooters and
>Dash, Laguna Seca for N2/N99/N3, maybe even a couple F1 tracks for the road
>course lovers like me, lol. But anyways, if they just released a tracks
>add-on, that all the cdrom had was only tracks, I'd be happy to spend as
>much as $25 or so for an add-on like that, rather than having to surf the
>web and try to figure out which of the 5 different home-brewed (track name
>here) looked the best and was most realistic looking, and realistic driving.

>If you read that Papy, take my idea and run with it!! Run hard and fast, get
>it done, i'll buy it!! :o)



>> The point that I see is that Papy made the track and now pretty
>> much everyone has it.

>> Instead of being grateful that Papy even made the track and
>> effectively let it get distributed (you can not tell me that Papy
>> did not know it would happen when they put out the demo at
>> Daytona) people instead are mad at Papy for not allowing it
>> to be run openly on Won.net.

>> Your comments are a perfect example, you see the whole Daytona
>> thing as Papy shitting on the fans, while I see it as the fact that
>> we now have the ability to play Daytona which we did not have
>> before.  This is not even considering the fact that NONE of us
>> paid for it.  (even if you bought the program that had the demo,
>> you paid for the demo, not the ability to race Daytona on the
>> full N3 game)

>> We have two different opinions, and that is all they are.. opinions.

>> Lets leave it at that



>> > Sure they did, but that's beside the point.  The point is, Papy is
>> clamping
>> > down and in the process is effectively going to give themselves a
>> razorblade
>> >***.  You don't shite on your fans in the name of self-righteousness,
>> > unless of course you're a pro-wrestler but I'm going afield here.  I
>say,
>> > let's hope future sims are as easily edited as Rally Championship, which
>> > basically has everything out and exposed in terms of graphics and
>physics.

>> > I'm PRAYING World Sports Car will be as wonderfully detailed and
>realistic
>> > as it looks to be, while still leaving some ground for the ***
>> > enthusiast to tread upon.

>> > If all else fails, we'll force Dave Noonan to keep creating tracks for
>GPL
>> > until there are no tracks left to build! ::)

>> > --

>> > Erik Frechette
>> > The Pits Grand Prix Legends
>> > www.theuspits.com/owheel/gpl/gpl.html
>> > The Pits Rally Championship
>> > www.theuspits.com/fbody/rallychamp/rallychamp.html


>> > > The day it is released

>> > > btw, I do not think it will be $50, probably $30

>> > > You also act like someone else made the Daytona track and Papy
>> > > just wants to kill the use of it.  Papy made it themselves



>> > > > Is everybody really going to go out and spend $50 for eight new
>tracks
>> > and
>> > > a
>> > > > patch that will supposedly cut out any use of the leaked Daytona
>> track?
>> > > > Good God man, let's not REWARD Papy further for releasing NASCAR2.3
>by
>> > > > buying NASCAR2.35.....

>> > > > Erik's views are not necessarily the views of The Pits, his parents
>or
>> > any
>> > > > of his friends.

>> > > > --

>> > > > Erik Frechette
>> > > > The Pits Grand Prix Legends
>> > > > www.theuspits.com/owheel/gpl/gpl.html
>> > > > The Pits Rally Championship
>> > > > www.theuspits.com/fbody/rallychamp/rallychamp.html


>> > > > > Does anyone know if a release date has been announced for the N3
>> Truck
>> > > > Pack.

j..

N3 Truck release date

by j.. » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Ohhh no we can't just leave it at that! ;) A few points i'd like to make on
the subject. 1- Yes Papy made the track and I am grateful. 2- The track on
the net is not the demo track, it is a pre-release version of the demo track.
3- Papy isn't shittin on us, DIS is with their licensing deal. 4- A patch
that excludes Daytona (doubtful) would be Papy shitting on us to appease DIS.
5- Open ended game architecture IS the future, by shutting down the
"upgrades", Papy would be killing the longevity of the software. 6- The hell
with won.net, get icq and play tcpip all you want. 7- The damn Truck pack
should be free. (but being the dumbass I am, i'll pay the price for it) 8-
Lets leave it at THAT lol


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Dave Henri

N3 Truck release date

by Dave Henri » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

  We regularly run the ICR2 road courses with N3 online with the beta
patch.  You can't "see" the tracks but they are there.  Leagues
can still host using the ip address feature in N3.  The difficulty
in this tho...is: it has become very hard to attract new right-turn
drivers since they never see the races being offered.  The first few
patches I met many roadcourse devotees, but now I haven't made contact
with any since the limits were put in place.
  check out what is possible with N3 now at....

http://www.racesimcentral.net/
(don't forget to check out the results link at the bottom of the
 page for a sneak peak of the Big Sky/Fallyn Racing Dodge Intrepid.

and hopefully soon in the near future at...

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

dave henrie


> Speaking of WON.net and they/Papy coalition not allowing Daytona to be
> openly played/displayed on the game servers with the patch......

> But did you know that this goes for *ANY* track as well? Not throwing any
> stones, just passing on some additional information, hehe.

> Anyways, I've tried Heartland Park, Laguna Seca, Pocono and others, that
> came from ICR2, N2 or N99. None of those tracks will appear in the race list
> if you run them. Apparently there's some kind of "kill filter" being used by
> either Won or Papy, so that if you use *ANY* track that did not come with
> N3, then nobody will be able to see it, or know it's there, unless you
> spread it by word of mouth, such as by setting up the IP game method, hehe.

> Basically, I think that sucks, but then I guess Papy/Won have their reasons.
> I just thought it was be mighty nice to run the old tracks from the old
> sims, with N3. But then, I guess they think that would kill their sales of
> the Truck patch, if they would allow people to bring over Flemington,
> Heartland Park, I-70, etc, over to N3 and use online. Sounding like it boils
> down to the mighty dollar ruling the world.

> I'm not against them selling their products and making money, but hey, what
> we already bought, we should still be able to use, even if it happens to
> work with a newer version of a game.

> As it stands, we have to wait for the Truck add-on, the Goody's Dash add-on,
> the ARCA add-on, the TPTCC (if the Pits sells them the rights, hehe;)
> add-on, the weekend warrior local short track saturday night add-on, and on
> and on.

> There's so many add-ons that Papy is having to make to keep us all happy,
> that it will be N8 by the time they get it all done probably, hehe. That's
> not saying that they will ever make any of those add-ons, but hey, we can
> dream. But if they don't, they should at least give us a little creative
> freedom to create our own add-ons. I guess if quake2 players are allowed to
> do it, with the blessings of ID Software Inc even, then maybe Papy will let
> us do it.  ;o)

> Destin

> P.S. If Papy really wanted to make some big $$$, all they gotta do is put
> out a "Tracks Add-On" for N3, and even N2/N99 users, that features dozens,
> hopefully 100 or more, of various real life tracks from around the country,
> and even the world. Tracks like Lanier here in Georgia, used by Hooters and
> Dash, Laguna Seca for N2/N99/N3, maybe even a couple F1 tracks for the road
> course lovers like me, lol. But anyways, if they just released a tracks
> add-on, that all the cdrom had was only tracks, I'd be happy to spend as
> much as $25 or so for an add-on like that, rather than having to surf the
> web and try to figure out which of the 5 different home-brewed (track name
> here) looked the best and was most realistic looking, and realistic driving.

> If you read that Papy, take my idea and run with it!! Run hard and fast, get
> it done, i'll buy it!! :o)



> > The point that I see is that Papy made the track and now pretty
> > much everyone has it.

> > Instead of being grateful that Papy even made the track and
> > effectively let it get distributed (you can not tell me that Papy
> > did not know it would happen when they put out the demo at
> > Daytona) people instead are mad at Papy for not allowing it
> > to be run openly on Won.net.

> > Your comments are a perfect example, you see the whole Daytona
> > thing as Papy shitting on the fans, while I see it as the fact that
> > we now have the ability to play Daytona which we did not have
> > before.  This is not even considering the fact that NONE of us
> > paid for it.  (even if you bought the program that had the demo,
> > you paid for the demo, not the ability to race Daytona on the
> > full N3 game)

> > We have two different opinions, and that is all they are.. opinions.

> > Lets leave it at that



> > > Sure they did, but that's beside the point.  The point is, Papy is
> > clamping
> > > down and in the process is effectively going to give themselves a
> > razorblade
> > >***.  You don't shite on your fans in the name of self-righteousness,
> > > unless of course you're a pro-wrestler but I'm going afield here.  I
> say,
> > > let's hope future sims are as easily edited as Rally Championship, which
> > > basically has everything out and exposed in terms of graphics and
> physics.

> > > I'm PRAYING World Sports Car will be as wonderfully detailed and
> realistic
> > > as it looks to be, while still leaving some ground for the ***
> > > enthusiast to tread upon.

> > > If all else fails, we'll force Dave Noonan to keep creating tracks for
> GPL
> > > until there are no tracks left to build! ::)

> > > --

> > > Erik Frechette
> > > The Pits Grand Prix Legends
> > > www.theuspits.com/owheel/gpl/gpl.html
> > > The Pits Rally Championship
> > > www.theuspits.com/fbody/rallychamp/rallychamp.html


> > > > The day it is released

> > > > btw, I do not think it will be $50, probably $30

> > > > You also act like someone else made the Daytona track and Papy
> > > > just wants to kill the use of it.  Papy made it themselves



> > > > > Is everybody really going to go out and spend $50 for eight new
> tracks
> > > and
> > > > a
> > > > > patch that will supposedly cut out any use of the leaked Daytona
> > track?
> > > > > Good God man, let's not REWARD Papy further for releasing NASCAR2.3
> by
> > > > > buying NASCAR2.35.....

> > > > > Erik's views are not necessarily the views of The Pits, his parents
> or
> > > any
> > > > > of his friends.

> > > > > --

> > > > > Erik Frechette
> > > > > The Pits Grand Prix Legends
> > > > > www.theuspits.com/owheel/gpl/gpl.html
> > > > > The Pits Rally Championship
> > > > > www.theuspits.com/fbody/rallychamp/rallychamp.html


> > > > > > Does anyone know if a release date has been announced for the N3
> > Truck
> > > > > Pack.

Cliff Roma

N3 Truck release date

by Cliff Roma » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Its called a license, and if you do not have it, you can not offer
it.  Sure.. let Papy use your thoughts and put out a patch that has
Daytona so they can get sued.

> 4- A patch that excludes Daytona (doubtful) would be Papy shitting on
> us to appease DIS.

<ka0..

N3 Truck release date

by <ka0.. » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

   Exactly, the software companies have learned that games priced over
$49.99 sit on the shelves like stones.  They try to circumvent this
limit by leaving out features in thier games/sims and then selling them
as expansion packs. Which, imo, should sit on the shelves like stones.

   Jim

ymenar

N3 Truck release date

by ymenar » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00


Unfortunately, since one of the beta build they are actually doing this.

It's poor eh?  The sport of Stockcar online racing has went down the hill
since Nascar Racing 3 is released.  But of course they got our money, so why
care?

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

ymenar

N3 Truck release date

by ymenar » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00


You are absolutely right.  But if you look at the problem from an external
POV, you'll see how pathetic the thing is.  When the users are fighting
against the product they have bought simply to be able to make other users
enjoy the same product, it has gone way downhill :(

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

Stif

N3 Truck release date

by Stif » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Funny that Micro Prose or any of the hacked tracks in GP2 were never Lic or
no one got sued?
Looks like a bunch of greedy bastards to me.
Thats the way the world is and if I had a nuke bomb I set her off!


> > P.S. If Papy really wanted to make some big $$$, all they gotta do is
put
> > out a "Tracks Add-On" for N3, and even N2/N99 users, that features
dozens,
> > hopefully 100 or more, of various real life tracks from around the
> country,
> > and even the world.

> You can't just pick tracks and create an add-on track.  It's a business,
> remember.  Carefully creating the tracks takes a very long time of
> production.  And since Papyrus has probably a limited amouth of artist
that
> can work on this (and work at the same time for other products), you can't
> do that.

> Especially since you need to license those tracks, which cost money and
> takes alot of time.  The rest of your message had some sense, still ;)

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> -- http://www.WeRace.net
> -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

Dave Henri

N3 Truck release date

by Dave Henri » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00

  they never tried to license Daytona for gp3 did they??
dave henrie

> Funny that Micro Prose or any of the hacked tracks in GP2 were never Lic or > no one got sued?

ymenar

N3 Truck release date

by ymenar » Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:00:00


Microprose chosen to not take any action with the track editing third party
utilities because that's their philosophy.  They weren't add-on tracks.  In
fact if you check out the user-created tracks for the Papyrus series, you'll
see that Sierra doesn't legally do anything against that.  They do of course
if you give for free copyrighted code by Papyrus (such as full .dat file).

Take GPL per example and Brands Hatch and the O-Ring.  Or converted track
for about any old game engine software.

Unfortunately, since for Nascar Racing 3 we run online on a WON.NET system
(which Sierra is the owner),  they have to legally do action against illegal
tracks just to keep their arse safe, even if that means pissing off their
customers.  That's how pathetic the legalities are today in the ***
business.

There is also the role of the track owners to protect their track name and
likeness, but that's another complicated thing.  The Daytona track for a
Nascar sim has a much bigger appeal than any F1 user-created track for GP2.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

j..

N3 Truck release date

by j.. » Tue, 14 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Ahhh let me clarify what I posted, in case you missed the original post.
The original post asked if the patch would render Daytona unusable, not
that it would or would not include it. If Papy chooses to include code
in the patch that does not allow me to play my Daytona track, then that
is Papy shitting on us to appease DIS. I did not mean to infer that they
should or would include Daytona. OK, I think I muddied that up a little.
-JH-



> Its called a license, and if you do not have it, you can not offer
> it.  Sure.. let Papy use your thoughts and put out a patch that has
> Daytona so they can get sued.




Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Cliff Roma

N3 Truck release date

by Cliff Roma » Tue, 14 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Gotcha, and yes I misunderstood what you were saying.

As far as I know, the patch does stop you from posting a
public Daytona race on Won.net, but I can fully understand
that.

However I do not think the patch in any way prohibits you
from racing the track locally on your own machine or via
IP Address with someone else


> Ahhh let me clarify what I posted, in case you missed the original post.
> The original post asked if the patch would render Daytona unusable, not
> that it would or would not include it. If Papy chooses to include code
> in the patch that does not allow me to play my Daytona track, then that
> is Papy shitting on us to appease DIS. I did not mean to infer that they
> should or would include Daytona. OK, I think I muddied that up a little.
> -JH-



> > Its called a license, and if you do not have it, you can not offer
> > it.  Sure.. let Papy use your thoughts and put out a patch that has
> > Daytona so they can get sued.



> > > 4- A patch that excludes Daytona (doubtful) would be Papy shitting
> on
> > > us to appease DIS.

> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

j..

N3 Truck release date

by j.. » Tue, 14 Mar 2000 04:00:00

LOL
usenet, home of misunderstanding and creative editing (snip).
-JH-

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Don Hancock (

N3 Truck release date

by Don Hancock ( » Tue, 14 Mar 2000 04:00:00


>I agree, there is no way I am giving up Daytona.

    Two things: 1) IF the trucks are less than $20, I'll get it on the first
day.  (Nascar 2 didn't even have Busch Series, but now people *** since
NR99 had trucks!) 2) Even if they DO disable the ability to run Daytona,
I'll just install another setup of N3 without the trucks and continue to run
it.  It's too much fun to do without, but then - so are the trucks!!
    BTW, being in Portland we're too close to any "real" tracks, so now the
ability to have PIR and Portland Speedway (the 1/2 mile oval) in the game is
AWESOME!!

Gunner


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.