Joe
Another example of someone at r.a.s. trying to insult my intelligence level.
<applause>
Again, I have nothing to apologize for in my original post. NOTHING. Re-read
it. You know what I will apologize for? If, in the past, I have ever
intentionally or unintentionally, dropped to your level and insulted you, or
anyone else at r.a.s., then I'm sorry. I may have. I remember I
unintentionally, by not wording my statement clearly, insulted Ken, and I
apologized to him. Maybe I've done it again but not intentionally.
Those messages appeared on 3/29. Anyone remember who referred readers of
r.a.s., about a week after those vulgar messages appeared, some with forged
names of real people, to go and look at them and provided the link? That
person must of enjoyed them and certainly wasn't too offended by them, or
else why would he refer us all to read the posts.
I've grown bored (never did interest me in the slightest) with the nonsense
directed at me, and others at r.a.s. I'll continue to enjoy the auto sim
talk.
Dave
<<Those messages appeared on 3/29. Anyone remember who referred readers
of r.a.s., about a week after those vulgar messages appeared, some with
forged names of real people, to go and look at them and provided the
link? That person must of enjoyed them and certainly wasn't too offended
by them, or else why would he refer us all to read the posts.>>
Yep, I posted the URL and told people that if they thought it was nuts
in this NG, they ought to have a look at the total insanity going on in
Apex. Those messages were posted by anonymous user(s) hiding behind
faked names. That's one way to be irresponsible and gutless. Another way
is to not have the maturity to admit you're wrong when you quite plainly
*are*.
I'm wrong a lot. I apologize a lot. I don't make accusations that I know
to be untrue. I'm no saint, and I freely acknowledge my all-too-human
frailties. On the net, we are all nothing but words -- if you can't
stand by your words, then you're just plain nothing.
Bart Brown
> > It helps people if I
> > can inform them of a bad game in advance.
> That is a fine and noble philosophy, George.
> Just remember, however, that we quite often have different ideas when it comes
> to "good" and "bad" aspects of games.
> As an example, just refer to the*** that Mr. Mak is copping at the moment:
> Charles considers that GPL is "arcady" and "unrealistic" (even though he is
> basing that judgement on a *** demo) yet he is outweighed by those who
> consider it to be the epitome of all that is real in sims and close to the
> Second Coming in religious experiences.
> ---
> Barton,
> If you read my post, I never once gave any indication that it was you I was
> speaking of. There are hundreds of people here at r.a.s. Many have replied
> to my posts. I stated very clearly that I WAS NOT going to say who it was to
> anyone and I CLEARLY gave the reasons why. Why you've involved yourself is
> beyond me. I KNOW who it was and that's all that matters to me.
> The only reason I'm replying to your post now is because you have apparently
> decided to involve others who have nothing to do with what I posted. I
> haven't discussed anything in that thread with anyone at the APEX, or anyone
> at all for that matter. So leave them out of it.
> The main thrust of my post was how rude this place has become when all
> that's being discussed is auto simulators. NO NAMES were mentioned AT ALL
> and I didn't provide any hints in the slightest. You will get no public
> apologies from me since it was your choice to involve yourself in this
> thread. In case you haven't noticed, the post has been up for 13 hours and
> NO ONE has replied saying they thought I was referring to you due to what I
> said in my post. If you want to take some kind of action against me, go
> ahead, I'll let the lawyers take care of it. I really don't care.
> Dave
> Ah Bart like I said its caution not lack of courage. You may forward as you
> choose. Yes I claim freedom of speech for myself as well as all others
> including you Bart. Listen I am going now but I would like to just share this
> with you and others who may read this. What I have seen here is lots of
> intolerance. Which I cant say I really understand, arent you all interested
> in basically the same thing? Driving these racing programs? Well shouldn't it
> be more like theosophy? What I mean is it should be ok to have more than 1
> God. The fact is all of you here enjoy something with a common denominator
> that being driving. Why not live and let live? If you have nothing good to
> say say nothing about one of these driving programs unless asked directly for
> your opinion. At that point others should follow the same and not begrudge
> you that opinion. Well goodbye I hope you enjoy your driiving programs and
> lighten up.
"Oh hiya, I'd just like to say that I don't entirely agree with your
point of view:) But don't get me wrong - I still think your a REALLY
wonderful person :))) Sorry, I gotta go now because my mother/wife
want's me to*** the sludge out from under her toe nails. Cya later
hon. Hugs and kisses"
Now Mr Physcho, this would make your day right? And fit in with your
educated ideal view of proper human behavior yes?***off!
: I have been exceptionally patient with your obnoxious pig-headedness,
: but this is WAY beyond the last straw. You will post a public apology to
: me, in this NewsGroup, recanting these base, malicious, and PROVABLY
: false accusations within 3 days time, or I will continue to pursue the
: matter through all appropriate channels, including the FCC -- something
: neither your ISP or the server carrying the Apex website is likely to
: find a cheerful prospect.
Ahahahahah! There's little that amuses me more than a long-winded guy
who claims he's gonna sic someone's ISP and the FCC on someone else.
While I could not care less about who said what and where, this threat
is just ***ing hilarious. As are the other occasional threats of this
ilk that are seen. What a crock.
dsh
