>> Well, he *did* say "as long as everything runs perfectly under Win98SE"...
>In
>> other words, what's the "must have" feature of win2k or XP?
>> I haven't seen anything that makes me want to run out and plunk down my
>dollars
>> yet.
>> Eldred
>Then don't. No one is trying to twist your arm and make you use XP. There
>was no real good reason to upgrade from Dos6.0 to 6.22, but I did anyway.
>Did it make my games run better? Nope. And as for the guy ranting in the
>above post about bad memory mangement under Win2K and how unstable it is and
>none of his games run, etc. I just have to wonder what kind of equipment he
>is using and/or what kind(s) of drug(s) he is on. I installed XP on my
>machine and the only thing I had to provide a driver for was my Santa Cruz
>soundcard. Oh, and i ahd a spot of trouble with a joystick, but apart form
>that it has been rock solid for me. Every game I have tried so far has run
>fine.
enhancement or feature. I was just asking for info. But why would you invite
problems by changing to a new OS with no perceivable benefit? That's the
original question, which you didn't really answer...
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.