rec.autos.simulators

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

Paul Johnso

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Paul Johnso » Sat, 22 Mar 1997 04:00:00

Just got a Compaq 120 pentium w/ 32 meg of ram, and just found out about
driving sims.  
1 What should I buy, nascar, f1 etc?
2 What kind of controler to go with it (under $100.00 pls)
3 Will I have to upgrade any cards ?
Any other advice.  TIA

Steve Vandergrif

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Steve Vandergrif » Sat, 22 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> I read that early on 'Indy' cars did run at Daytona (back when I think
> they were called 'Champ' cars (a longgggg time ago) and atleast one
> driver was killed there. It was deemed too dangerous and they haven't
> been back since.

> Akh

Actually, the first driver to lose his life at Daytona was Marshall
Teague, a local NASCAR hero who was testing an Indy prototype.  The car
slammed into the wall between turns one and two, and completely broke
apart.  Teague was launched (still strapped to the drivers seat) 150-200
feet in the air.  This happened just days after the speedway opened.

God Bless,
Steve

jo

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by jo » Sat, 22 Mar 1997 04:00:00


<...>

<...>

That is a good point. Fact is, though, it was pointed out to my by ABC
television last year that indycars could be easily doing laps over
*300* MPH if they were given free reign on various design features,
primarily in the area of downforce. But that is simply *way* too
dangerous, for spectators and for pilots.

Daytona would be a pretty exciting alternative to IMS for CART. So
far, the reasons I hear here don't quite cut it, since it would be
possible to limit speed to the, say, 230 range like IMS and Michigan.
Could it be that NASCAR has some sort of unwritten "rights" over
Daytona? I mean, F1 won't race anywhere Indycars do (wonder why?)-
maybe NASCAR has its own special hold over Daytona.

Michigan is great, but for whatever reason (maybe age), it just isn't
a Daytona or an IMS. I notice there is only one CART race at Michigan
this year, unlike the two last year.

Michael E. Carve

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Michael E. Carve » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


: Just got a Compaq 120 pentium w/ 32 meg of ram, and just found out about
: driving sims.  
: 1 What should I buy, nascar, f1 etc?
: 2 What kind of controler to go with it (under $100.00 pls)
: 3 Will I have to upgrade any cards ?
: Any other advice.  TIA

I think to start with, go for the race sim that you follow most.  If you
are a NASCAR fan, you won't go wrong if you go for NASCAR Racing 2
(don't even think about buying the first version).  However, if you
really dig Formula 1 racing, go for Grand Prix II.

After you get into one and still enjoy the sim, go ahead a pop for the
other one.  If you are really a fanatic, you might want to go out and
find a copy of Indycar Racing II.  However, if you aren't really a race
sim junkie, wait until some of the newer sims come out.

As for a controller under $100.00....  Wait until there is a sale on
Thrustmaster's T2 or their Grand Prix wheel.  They usually go for around
$99.00 (US) at places like Best Buy or Computer City when ever they have
a sale.

As for cards...  Well that depends on which sim you pick up first.  If
you go for NASCAR 2, look for a Rendition (Verite) based card.  Besides,
both Sierra's and Intergraph's card come with IndyCar Racing II.  The
combo between NASCAR 2/Indycar 2 and the Rendition board will really
make your system rock if can handle DMA on the PCI side.

If you opt for Grand Prix II, get the fastest video card you can afford,
as this sim really sucks the juices out of your video and CPU.

Welcome to the club!!!

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Steven Becke

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Steven Becke » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> Just got a Compaq 120 pentium w/ 32 meg of ram, and just found out about
> driving sims.
> 1 What should I buy, nascar, f1 etc?
> 2 What kind of controler to go with it (under $100.00 pls)
> 3 Will I have to upgrade any cards ?
> Any other advice.  TIA

IMHO, Gran Prix II from Microprose/Spectrum Holobyte it the most
realistic sim...I own N1, Indycar, IndycarII, Power F1, and have played
the n2 demo, and these all have downfalls which keep me from playing
them alot.  With the N1,2 and Indy1,2 the major downfall is the computer
controled cars which react unnaturally when I try to pass.  With Power
F1, I couldn't get the controls set up properly on my computer(no
brakes) which decreased my enjoyment.  Gran Prix is not without it's
problems, but I can live with them(happily)  Steve
Michael E. Carve

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Michael E. Carve » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


: Who really gives a shit about daytona and indy.  Just 2 more tracks.  I'd
: be disapointed if Talladega, Bristol or Atlanta were missing from Nascar.
: Indy would be about like Loudon except 4 straights.  Why does everyone
: spend so much time dwelling on the indy/daytona issue??

Here is a quote from the great 20th Century philosopher Steven Wright:

"I watched the Indy 500, and I was thinking that if they left
earlier they wouldn't have to go so fast."

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Lonnie Andre Min

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Lonnie Andre Min » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> Just got a Compaq 120 pentium w/ 32 meg of ram, and just found out about
> driving sims.  
> 1 What should I buy, nascar, f1 etc?
> 2 What kind of controler to go with it (under $100.00 pls)
> 3 Will I have to upgrade any cards ?
> Any other advice.  TIA

The first question is easy:  You shouldn't have any trouble with your
machine's ability to run sims (I use a PB w/P75, so you've got more
horspower then I do!)

As for which sim: Wow Paul, that's a tough question to answer.  I have
several different racing sims, and each is so different.  Really, I
think it comes down to what you like best.  As a general rule, the
Nascar sims offer close,fun racing on the ovals (I stink on the
Nascar road courses).  The open wheel cars are more responsive, and
perhaps because of this I can do better on road courses with them. I
enjoy both forms (Nascar and open wheel) of racing sims, but lean
toward the Nascar side because I happen to like Nascar a bunch. As for
what's best for you... only you can find that out!

As for controls, again, it depends.  Joysticks are pretty inexpensive,
and will certainly come in under your target price.  However, once I
switched over to a wheel/pedal combo... I never looked back.  There's
*no comparison* between the driving experience a good wheel on a good
sim offers over a joystick on the same sim.  As for wheel/pedal prices,
I think I've read on this newsgroup that some Best Buy stores are
having a sale on the Thrustmaster T2 wheel/pedal for $99.  That's the
wheel I've used for the past year or more.

Concerning your last question, I'm no expert on that sort of stuff,
but IMHO you should be fine, card wise.  

John 'aka' Deliverybo

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by John 'aka' Deliverybo » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00



> In CART,
> immediately I can think of many big passes- Zanardi in the corkscrew
> at Laguna Seca on the last lap of the last race is a pretty damn good
> example.

Did you catch the Letterman line on RPM2Night a few weeks ago?
"Alex must have been drunk"

After the first two corners it is rather predictable.

No but we do have the Andrettis :-)

John

--
John "aka' Deliveryboy

http://www.mindspring.com/~deliveryboy/index.htm
http://www.mindspring.com/~deliveryboy/1666/nascar.htm
http://www.mindspring.com/~deliveryboy/Captures/index.htm

         -- "Where's my Snappy?" --

David Gar

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by David Gar » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> I read that early on 'Indy' cars did run at Daytona (back when I think
> they were called 'Champ' cars (a longgggg time ago) and atleast one
> driver was killed there. It was deemed too dangerous and they haven't
> been back since.

> Akh

Are you sure it was Daytona Akh?
I think I heard somewhere that a driver was killed at Talley
when the indycar he was driving snapped in half while practicing.
Could someone verify this. The neat thing is we can kinda get a feel of
what its like to run at Daytona,..oops Talladega thanks to ole'
Gerhard and ICR2!

-DG-

David Gar

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by David Gar » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> Didn't the Chevy boys want to do this to the Fords to give the chevys a chance?

> Mike

Are you kidding?!!

Fords have just now been able to stand a chance against the Monte Carlos
on the superspeedways!
Jarret won it last year because of all the whinning the Ford fellas were
giving and NASCAR
gave the chevys more limitations!!

-DG-

Ed Benso

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Ed Benso » Mon, 24 Mar 1997 04:00:00





> <...>
> .snip.

> Daytona would be a pretty exciting alternative to IMS for CART. So
> far, the reasons I hear here don't quite cut it, since it would be
> possible to limit speed to the, say, 230 range like IMS and Michigan.
> Could it be that NASCAR has some sort of unwritten "rights" over
> Daytona? I mean, F1 won't race anywhere Indycars do (wonder why?)-
> maybe NASCAR has its own special hold over Daytona.

.snip.

Well, NASCAR *owns* Daytona. I guess that would qualify as "it's own
special hold." Bill France built Daytona.
As to why CART doesn't race there, I think speed is the main reason.
It's not just the size of the track either, if that we're the case
restricting turbo boost might work, but the banking is a consideration
as well. I don't know the details, but the gist is that CART's cars
wouldn't be safe running on that steep banking.
Also, Nascar is affiliated with Tony George by way of the Brickyard and
that probably is also a factor, ie. CART and NASCAR aren't on real
friendly terms.
--
Ed


"A friend of mine suggested I try America Online, I said 'But I already
have
a computer...'"

Jim Sokolo

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Jim Sokolo » Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:00:00

On Sun, 23 Mar 1997 20:09:18 -0500, Ed Benson



>> Daytona would be a pretty exciting alternative to IMS for CART. So
>> far, the reasons I hear here don't quite cut it, since it would be
>> possible to limit speed to the, say, 230 range like IMS and Michigan.
>> Could it be that NASCAR has some sort of unwritten "rights" over
>> Daytona? I mean, F1 won't race anywhere Indycars do (wonder why?)-
>> maybe NASCAR has its own special hold over Daytona.
>Well, NASCAR *owns* Daytona. I guess that would qualify as "it's own
>special hold." Bill France built Daytona.

Strictly speaking, that's not correct. NASCAR (the sanctioning body)
doesn't own Daytona (the race track). International Speedway Corp owns
Daytona. It happens that a lot of NASCAR and a lot of ISC are owned by
the same people, but that doesn't make your statement true...

---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus

motisk

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by motisk » Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:00:00


> On Sun, 23 Mar 1997 20:09:18 -0500, Ed Benson


> >> Daytona would be a pretty exciting alternative to IMS for CART. So
> >> far, the reasons I hear here don't quite cut it, since it would be
> >> possible to limit speed to the, say, 230 range like IMS and Michigan.
> >> Could it be that NASCAR has some sort of unwritten "rights" over
> >> Daytona? I mean, F1 won't race anywhere Indycars do (wonder why?)-
> >> maybe NASCAR has its own special hold over Daytona.

> >Well, NASCAR *owns* Daytona. I guess that would qualify as "it's own
> >special hold." Bill France built Daytona.

> Strictly speaking, that's not correct. NASCAR (the sanctioning body)
> doesn't own Daytona (the race track). International Speedway Corp owns
> Daytona. It happens that a lot of NASCAR and a lot of ISC are owned by
> the same people, but that doesn't make your statement true...

> ---Jim Sokoloff, Papyrus

I THINK the reason they dont run there is because the suspension on an
indy car, cart type car wouldnt be able to handle the banking and
speeds. just the track alone being so bumpy im sure would make it hard
for indy cars....
Vade

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Vade » Wed, 26 Mar 1997 04:00:00

How 'bout having the CART guys drive on the DAytona road course? This would
be very interesting...

Earl

Well, Papy has lost the Indy fight as well...

by Earl » Wed, 26 Mar 1997 04:00:00



>> I read that early on 'Indy' cars did run at Daytona (back when I think
>> they were called 'Champ' cars (a longgggg time ago) and atleast one
>> driver was killed there. It was deemed too dangerous and they haven't
>> been back since.

>> Akh

>Are you sure it was Daytona Akh?

Yes, and it wasn't just Teague, but George Amick (the guy who beat AJ
for 500 ROTY honors in '58) in the Indycar race itself.

Earl


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.