The wet weather is amazing in as much as it's not just wet it's
dynamic on one side of the track it can be wet and the other can be
dry and then 10 minutes later vice versa it's really cool.
Regards Mike
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:43:31 -0700, "Mitch Alatorre"
>The difference between Falcon4 and GP3 is that Falcon4 was just buggy upon
>release. Still groundbreaking in terms of a quality flight sim (Dynamic
>campaign still the best). GP3 is nothing more than a good game, nothing
>really ground breaking (like GPL). The wet weather could be great but we
>have to wait for the final to know how that turns out.
>Mitch
>> Then how come it says "13 July, 2000" inside the gp3readme.txt file?
>Hmm...
>> And how much can they do in 7 weeks? Fix bugs, sure, but a complete
>overhaul
>> of the physics and graphics engines? Doubtful. Well, you're right, time
>will
>> tell.
>> I have to say that this whole situation reminds me a lot about the immense
>> hype and sky-high expectations that were generated in anticipation of the
>> release of Falcon 4.0 in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sims. For over a
>year,
>> people said that it would change the world as we know it, pretty much just
>> on the basis of the prior version alone. When it did come out, there was
>> massive disappointment. Not so much with what it tried to do, but in its
>> totally broken bug-laden state (which people forgot was the same case with
>> that prior 3.0 version - history was repeated). And the whole development
>> team was laid off before they every fully fixed it. Anyway, I guess it's
>> human nature to be e***d about something that's coming out, and that's
>> fine, but there were lots of really unjustified critical comments made
>here
>> in the past few months, for example, how it would compare against F1 2000,
>> that it would blow it away, etc., with no facts to back it up. It turns
>out
>> that F1 2000 has got really good physics and graphics after all. Well,
>> hindsight is 20/20, but I'm just glad that I didn't participate in this
>> frenzy. I'll probably still get it, but at least I know what to expect
>now.
>> Names aren't enough in this business.