rec.autos.simulators

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

Kenneth Verbur

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Kenneth Verbur » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00

Well, I bet youre still confused about what has been happening at the E3
Expo last week. NASCAR 3 has been delayed, NASCAR 2000 and Legends of NASCAR
have been announced and TAR has been cancelled.

Check out the full story at
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Enjoy!

Kenneth Verburg
Webmaster High Gear

Get 10% discount on ProPedal Racing Springs at
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Michae

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Michae » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00



- Michael

John Courtn

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by John Courtn » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00

TAR Cancelled!  What a shame, the sim had a lot of promise.  Hopefully it
will get picked up by someone, someday...  I guess N2000, a possible GP3
or maybe even Driver are the next sims we can mark on our calenders.

Later,
John

Michael E. Carve

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Michael E. Carve » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00


% Well, I bet youre still confused about what has been happening at the E3
% Expo last week. NASCAR 3 has been delayed, NASCAR 2000 and Legends of NASCAR
% have been announced and TAR has been cancelled.

% Check out the full story at
% http://www.simracingnews.com/newscenter/e3coverage/headlines/191.htm

But again this article is spreading the "myth":
"OK, if you take into account that the GPL engine really is very
difficult to drive and that casual drivers would find it impossible to
enjoy this new game."

Once again, the "physics" engine used in Grand Prix Legends isn't
difficult to drive!  The implementation of the engine when configured to
model 1967 era Formula 1 cars is extremely challenging to drive.  Not
difficult, challening.  And it's not the engine that is challenging, but
the cars that are being simulated.  Please seperate the two.

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Joel Willstei

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Joel Willstei » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00



>> Check out the full story at
>> http://www.simracingnews.com/newscenter/e3coverage/headlines/191.htm

>> Enjoy!


>- Michael

     I took your advice and read the whole article. I was hoping against
hope that TAR would be coming out,as I have waited for it release ever since
I 1st heard of it.  As of now it looks like it is a dead deal. What I don't
really understand as a business man,if they had a product that was in its
final stages,why would you can it? Especially since the "talk" has been so
positive about its release?

Joel Willstein

pez

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by pez » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00

I totally agree, there are too many people who think that it must be
difficult to drive if it uses the gpl engine, but its the 67gp car thats
tricky, the engine could model a go kart, and that would be nice and easy to
drive....now theres an idea for a cheap and cheerfull
sim.....................

pez

Wosc

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Wosc » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00

Yes go karts are SUPER simple to drive.  no skill to win.  ;-)  I have to
remind everyone, though, that GPL doesn't implement G forces put on the
driver and steering wheel feedback so how can you judge from the game that
it was extremely tough to drive back then.  It was much easier to drive back
then than the game suggests.  Do you think that the first time you got in
one, you would spin it down the front straight constantly?  I think that
people that blame GPL's difficulty on the fact that it was 1967 are wrong.
It is more on the fact that the feedback of today's computers is not good
enough to handle such a complex physics engine as GPL's.  So in that aspect,
it is a good idea not to use the GPL engine for the Nascar game.  I would
rather see them hold the GPL engine in storage until our feedback system
gets more advanced at which time they can bring it out and have a good base
setup to work with.  Thats my ideas at least.

Jesse Black

|I totally agree, there are too many people who think that it must be
|difficult to drive if it uses the gpl engine, but its the 67gp car thats
|tricky, the engine could model a go kart, and that would be nice and easy
to
|drive....now theres an idea for a cheap and cheerfull
|sim.....................
|
|pez
|
|

David Ewin

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by David Ewin » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00


> Yes go karts are SUPER simple to drive.  no skill to win.  ;-)  I have to
> remind everyone, though, that GPL doesn't implement G forces put on the
> driver and steering wheel feedback so how can you judge from the game that
> it was extremely tough to drive back then.  It was much easier to drive back
> then than the game suggests.
> Do you think that the first time you got in
> one, you would spin it down the front straight constantly?  I think that
> people that blame GPL's difficulty on the fact that it was 1967 are wrong.

Granted, not having G - forces makes it more difficult in some respects, but I
don't think that GPL is unrealistically hard.  I didn't spin all the way down
the straight, either, even on my first lap (and I'm a fairly mediocre GPL
driver).  I had developed a pretty light touch on the gas from driving GP2 with
F7 turned off.  It was definitely hard to control the car under braking at first
(had to learn to break in a straight line before turning in), but even after a
little practice I could trail break to some degree.  I don't think that in real
life I could have been have beaten John Surtees and Bruce McLaren after only
about 20 or so hours of practice.

I really feel the claims about the difficulty of GPL have been GREATLY
exaggerated.  I had a much harder time learning to drive GP2 with no steering
help, believe it or not.

Dave Ewing

J M Tinne

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by J M Tinne » Fri, 21 May 1999 04:00:00

I agree that too many ppl are blaming the difficulty of GPL on the era.
Graham Hill, second only to Jimmy Clark as a driver in that era, reckoned
that those cars were easier that modern cars (1974 in this case) to drive.
He says of the subject...

"Racing has changed a lot since I started.  The cars are faster and more
streamlined with more powerful engines and better fuel and oil.  Tyres are
wider and the negative lift from aerofoils,. have put up cornering speeds.
The brakes are better, too, allowing drivers to go deeper at the end of
straights before they have to brake.  Drivers have to concentrate harder and
the driving is a much finer balancing act than it was.  You could be rougher
with the older types of cars and get away with it.  Nowadays the driving has
to be more accurate and precise."

Graham Hill (1975)

Seeing that he had experience of driving front and mid engine cars, those
with and without downforce I have to say that what he had to say on the
subject holds up better than anything we might wish to argue.

Matthew.


> Yes go karts are SUPER simple to drive.  no skill to win.  ;-)  I have to
> remind everyone, though, that GPL doesn't implement G forces put on the
> driver and steering wheel feedback so how can you judge from the game that
> it was extremely tough to drive back then.  It was much easier to drive
back
> then than the game suggests.  Do you think that the first time you got in
> one, you would spin it down the front straight constantly?  I think that
> people that blame GPL's difficulty on the fact that it was 1967 are wrong.
> It is more on the fact that the feedback of today's computers is not good
> enough to handle such a complex physics engine as GPL's.  So in that
aspect,
> it is a good idea not to use the GPL engine for the Nascar game.  I would
> rather see them hold the GPL engine in storage until our feedback system
> gets more advanced at which time they can bring it out and have a good
base
> setup to work with.  Thats my ideas at least.

> Jesse Black


> |I totally agree, there are too many people who think that it must be
> |difficult to drive if it uses the gpl engine, but its the 67gp car thats
> |tricky, the engine could model a go kart, and that would be nice and easy
> to
> |drive....now theres an idea for a cheap and cheerfull
> |sim.....................
> |
> |pez
> |
> |

O'Connor

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by O'Connor » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

Some of our GPL fans should be warned about this thread. It might come as a
deep shock to them.



John Walla

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by John Walla » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 20 May 1999 22:31:51 +0100, "J M Tinney"


>I agree that too many ppl are blaming the difficulty of GPL on the era.
>Graham Hill, second only to Jimmy Clark as a driver in that era, reckoned
>that those cars were easier that modern cars (1974 in this case) to drive.

I think you need to read the comparisons once again. A 1967 F1 car
with no grip was compared with a modern day NASCAR - vastly heavier,
and with slick tyres. The problem in driving GPL is the lack of grip,
a very light weight and an abundance of power. The NASCAR has power,
but it also has much more grip and way heavier.

When you have someone like Hill comparing the cars remember he is a
driver of enormous talent. The 1967 cars lose grip much more gradually
than the 1974 slick-shod beasts, and therefore would be easier to
drive. For us the same would probably be true, and we would find that
if a 1994 F1 car was properly modelled then it too would be _very_
difficult to drive at or near the limit.

Cheers!
John

Matthias Fla

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Matthias Fla » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

On Thu, 20 May 1999 22:31:51 +0100, "J M Tinney"


>I agree that too many ppl are blaming the difficulty of GPL on the era.
>Graham Hill, second only to Jimmy Clark as a driver in that era, reckoned
>that those cars were easier that modern cars (1974 in this case) to drive.
>He says of the subject...
>"Racing has changed a lot since I started.  The cars are faster and more
>streamlined with more powerful engines and better fuel and oil.  Tyres are
>wider and the negative lift from aerofoils,. have put up cornering speeds.
>The brakes are better, too, allowing drivers to go deeper at the end of
>straights before they have to brake.  Drivers have to concentrate harder and
>the driving is a much finer balancing act than it was.  You could be rougher
>with the older types of cars and get away with it.  Nowadays the driving has
>to be more accurate and precise."
>Graham Hill (1975)

On the other hand, one might say that he simply states that is was
less demanding for him to become world champion in 1962 (and 1968) as
a rather young man than it was to keep up with the young guns like
Stewart, Fittipaldi, Lauda, Peterson in the 70, as an 45year old man,
hampered by the injuries of his '69 crash.

Graham Hill certainly knows a lot, but shouldn't we ask a person that
- as a driver has won GPs in 3 different decades plus 3 world
championships
- as car constructor (co-)developed cars in 3 different decades with
great success
- and is still alive?

Papy did. ;-)

--
Matthias Flatt

Chri

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Chri » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

OK, I give.  Who is it?

-Stewart?  Don't know if he's developed cars in three different decades
-Gurney?   Don't know if he's won GP's in three different decaded
-Brabham?  My best guess.

-Chris-

---Two wheels are better
---Proud owner of a 1998 ZX-9R

--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

Chri

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Chri » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

OK, I give.  Who is it?

-Stewart?  Don't know if he's developed cars in three different decades
-Gurney?   Don't know if he's won GP's in three different decades
-Brabham?  My best guess.

-Chris-

---Two wheels are better
---Proud owner of a 1998 ZX-9R

--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

Michael Barlo

** E3 Rumours Run Rampant **

by Michael Barlo » Sat, 22 May 1999 04:00:00

    I'd take a guess that you're after S. Moss?  I just seen him running a
car at the Historic race at the Glen last year, Or the Porche 50th at the
Glen last year (don't remember which)


> > Graham Hill certainly knows a lot, but shouldn't we ask a person that

> > - as a driver has won GPs in 3 different decades plus 3 world
> >   championships
> > - as car constructor (co-)developed cars in 3 different decades with
> >   great success
> > - and is still alive?

> > Papy did. ;-)

> > Matthias Flatt

> OK, I give.  Who is it?

> -Stewart?  Don't know if he's developed cars in three different decades
> -Gurney?   Don't know if he's won GP's in three different decaded
> -Brabham?  My best guess.

> -Chris-

> ---Two wheels are better
> ---Proud owner of a 1998 ZX-9R

> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> ---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow of Barlow Racing?
=========================================
Member of R.O.R. 1999
http://www.pivot.net/~marknjess/ror.html
=========================================
Racing online with the help of......

Race Communications Association
http://members.xoom.com/RCA/toc.html

Holodyne Engineering

Mystic Music

(have Your !!Name/Address!! placed here)

  mikeba.vcf
< 1K Download

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.