rec.autos.simulators

by **Greg Cisk** » Tue, 25 Apr 2000 04:00:00

> > No shit....but I will say this. The tracks are no where
> > near as bad as you and others seem to think they are.

> Another time, it depends on the level of accuracy some people want in
racing
> simulators. It's just normal that some people want more compared to
others.
> I want that friggin kurb to be at the same place then in real life. I

want

Just curious what you think about the curb layout in GPL.

It was accurate. Duh.

--

Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

by **Scott** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

I'd still be playing gp2 if I could get the ***ing sound to work!!!!!

by **Iain Mackenzi** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

No, I didn't say that.

modelling.
It's that sort of opinion that I and others think is rather silly - a total
exaggeration.

Simply not true either.

I agree with you here. Eau Rouge is particularly disappointing, but most of
Spa is good.
However, this argument should all have been about Silverstone, and I really
feel that those who are criticising the layout there are wrong.

So, we're not allowed to say good things about F12K or anything that isn't
GPL or GP2 in the F1 software world in this group? Dangerous.

In principle, you are right. However, in practice, you are wrong!

Iain

by **Pete** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Greg, having a hidden agenda means that Frank
doesn't like you! He tells me this repeatedly! :-)
By the way I like F12k although I would rather
play it then put it under a microscope looking for
minute flaws as some seem to do.

Pete

> > Your hidden agenda is very obvious. Please state posts that praise the
> > track accuracy of Albert Park. Nice try.

> Exactly what agenda is that?
> --

> Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

> cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

by **Remco Moe** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

>But this track accuracy stuff is getting a little silly.

Not if it's important for Francois. I can understand his reaction when
someone says that the tracks are accurate. When people critize a
game, it doesn't mean they don't like it. But this critism does help
to get a better game in the future.

Remco

by **Greg Cisk** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Oh I'm certain he doesn't like me. Big deal the guy is totally
***ing nuts.

Yep. I think that is my problem. I am too busy playing it.

--

Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

by **De Hoo** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Download the qualificationlap of Herbert with a inboard camera.
YOU have to be joking.
Watching this mpeg is watching F1 2000

http://members.xoom.com/f1high/

Ben

by **Chris Bloo** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Excellent post Alexander! Congratulations!

Chris

* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

by **Eldre** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

>I'd still be playing gp2 if I could get the ***ing sound to work!!!!!

SBLive? I'm just guessing...
I have one too, but I haven't tried GP2 since I bought the SBlive.

Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Ronald Stoeh** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

> >But this track accuracy stuff is getting a little silly.

> Not if it's important for Francois. I can understand his reaction when
> someone says that the tracks are accurate. When people critize a
> game, it doesn't mean they don't like it. But this critism does help
> to get a better game in the future.

Each his own, I say. Some guys get a seizure if a Hellfire rocket in
a flightsim has a slightly inaccurate flight path, some guys just hate
minor (in F1 2000 quite major) track inaccuracies.

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!

by **Greg Cisk** » Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:00:00

So you are saying that this lap will prove that F1 2000 is not accurate?
I am claiming that I saw the same lap (I have it taped) and from what
I saw Silverstone in F1 2000 was accurate. That is why I said Alexander
had to be joking.

--

Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

by **Alexander Mar** » Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:00:00

GP2 works fine with the SB Live's SB16 emulation driver. But I know of some
other PCI soundcards that don't work, which is a shame.

by **ymenar** » Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:00:00

LOL! ;-D

Good one Pete ;-)

It's slowly growing on me. Each time I re-try it, I find that some
positions I had before are a little exagerated, even if overall I find it
rushed and extremely flawled.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

by **ymenar** » Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:00:00

"Greg Cisko" <no.spam.email.for.me> wrote

I dislike nobody Greg ;)

Yeah, I know ;)

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

by **Iain Mackenzi** » Thu, 27 Apr 2000 04:00:00

Francois,
Do I hear peace breaking out very quietly?
Iain

rec.autos.simulators

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!

F12K - 4 out of 4 for accuracy!