rec.autos.simulators

by **andy bol** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Im sorry but i cant hold back any longer.How can you bunch of Idiots
keep slagging off a game that has not been released yet ? You are all
reviewing an unfinished version !!! I shall be there on Friday for my
copy .Its not about Graphics (but from the pics ive seen they look good
to me ) its all about Gameplay and enjoying yourself GP2 was so much fun
more than anyother f1game you could run with the cars competively from
day 1 and still have a sense of achievement on your first win!
Some of the letters here have been encouraging people enjoying there
races with the weather changing and such like. Please lay off the
slagging at least until Friday when we can have a go at the real thing.
Andy.

by **Andre Warring** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

You're wrong. It's "You bunch of twits!!"

Andre

by **Floatin** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

No, you're wrong. Its " You bunch of ***S!!", especially if you live in the
UK!

> >Im sorry but i cant hold back any longer.How can you bunch of Idiots
> >keep slagging off a game that has not been released yet ? You are all
> >reviewing an unfinished version !!! I shall be there on Friday for my
> >copy .Its not about Graphics (but from the pics ive seen they look good
> >to me ) its all about Gameplay and enjoying yourself GP2 was so much fun
> >more than anyother f1game you could run with the cars competively from
> >day 1 and still have a sense of achievement on your first win!
> >Some of the letters here have been encouraging people enjoying there
> >races with the weather changing and such like. Please lay off the
> >slagging at least until Friday when we can have a go at the real thing.
> >Andy.

> You're wrong. It's "You bunch of twits!!"

> Andre

by **Victor Cha** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Is about graphics, for me. I have a V5 and a PIII550E at 814 MHz. I want good graphics.
GP3 is not a role-playing game.

> Im sorry but i cant hold back any longer.How can you bunch of Idiots
> keep slagging off a game that has not been released yet ? You are all
> reviewing an unfinished version !!! I shall be there on Friday for my
> copy .Its not about Graphics (but from the pics ive seen they look good
> to me ) its all about Gameplay and enjoying yourself GP2 was so much fun
> more than anyother f1game you could run with the cars competively from
> day 1 and still have a sense of achievement on your first win!
> Some of the letters here have been encouraging people enjoying there
> races with the weather changing and such like. Please lay off the
> slagging at least until Friday when we can have a go at the real thing.
> Andy.

by **Greg Cisk** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Well be sure to post back here next Friday will a review.

--

by **speedy-fas** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:36:50 GMT, "Victor Chan"

>Is about graphics, for me. I have a V5 and a PIII550E at 814 MHz. I want good graphics.
>GP3 is not a role-playing game.

I'd take an amazing physics model over graphics anyday! It's the
physics model that keeps me playing the game.

Thus GPL... graphics are great. But without the physics model I would
have stopped playing it after 2 or 3 months.

by **The Black Cat =^..^** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:36:50 GMT, "Victor Chan"

>I want good graphics.
>GP3 is not a role-playing game.

Then you should definately get F1 2000. Beautiful pictures, crummy
game.

by **Jon Van Ginneke** » Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:00:00

That may be nice in your nation. But in the largest English speaking nation
it's a slang reference for a certain much sought after body part on a
woman....I'm guessing you call that a twit right? So an insult like that is
just like calling someone limp-wristed...on the other hand a twit in the
good ol USofA is just another way of saying idiot.

Learn the language for pete's sake... ;-)

Jon

> No, you're wrong. Its " You bunch of ***S!!", especially if you live in
the
> UK!

> > You're wrong. It's "You bunch of twits!!"

> > Andre

by **Victor Cha** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

I do have it (traded it with a MGPRS2). Beautiful graphics? It is only acceptable on a
V5 with 4XFSAA. However, the reply sucks. Tires look square when viewing at a distance.
As the view of angle getting close to the car, the tires look rounder.

> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:36:50 GMT, "Victor Chan"

> >I want good graphics.
> >GP3 is not a role-playing game.

> Then you should definately get F1 2000. Beautiful pictures, crummy
> game.

by **Tony Whitle** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

C.O.D. "***: n. (vulg.) female ***s; (derog.) unpleasant or stupid
person. [17th c; orig. unknown]

So Andy Bolt was right on both c(o)unts. The Brits are less mealy-mouthed
than the Americans when dealing out insults.

And since when did Yanks start speaking English? :-P

Tony Whitley

by **Simon Brow** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

It means exactly the same thing here in the UK. He was obviously trying to
be very offensive, and suceeded.

by **Andre Warrin** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:38:07 -0500, "Jon Van Ginneken"

>That may be nice in your nation. But in the largest English speaking nation
>it's a slang reference for a certain much sought after body part on a
>woman....I'm guessing you call that a twit right? So an insult like that is
>just like calling someone limp-wristed...on the other hand a twit in the
>good ol USofA is just another way of saying idiot.

Ehh... actually it was an inside joke, never mind, long story :)

Andre

>Learn the language for pete's sake... ;-)

>Jon

>> No, you're wrong. Its " You bunch of ***S!!", especially if you live in
>the
>> UK!

>> > You're wrong. It's "You bunch of twits!!"

>> > Andre

by **David Butte** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Er - no. In the UK, at least, "twit" is a harmless expression, quite
suitable for children (see "The Twits" by Roald Dahl"). "***" on the
other hand, means... well, what it means in the US. And is most
certainly *not* suitable for children. I reckon Andy knew *exactly*
what he was typing.

--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.17)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)

by **daxe** » Tue, 25 Jul 2000 04:00:00

yeah, we just go straight to shooting one another.

~daxe

by **Eldre** » Wed, 26 Jul 2000 04:00:00

Warringa) writes:
>On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:38:07 -0500, "Jon Van Ginneken"

>>That may be nice in your nation. But in the largest English speaking nation
>>it's a slang reference for a certain much sought after body part on a
>>woman....I'm guessing you call that a twit right? So an insult like that is
>>just like calling someone limp-wristed...on the other hand a twit in the
>>good ol USofA is just another way of saying idiot.

>Ehh... actually it was an inside joke, never mind, long story :)

>Andre

Andre, you seem to be involved in a LOT of inside jokes... :)

Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +69.95

Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

rec.autos.simulators

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!

You bunch of twats!!