rec.autos.simulators

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:00:46

are there any pitfalls one should be aware of when using Brian
Beckman's series as reference for implementing a simple simulator?

--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"Det er nok ingen ovn, men fartsm?leren v?r."

by **Ruud van Ga** » Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:51:59

Just that most of it is unorthodox and books generally take a
different route. But any route is ok, as long as you can follow it
enough to program it. :)

Ruud van Gaal
Free car sim : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/racer/
Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/

by **Dave Henri** » Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:04:36

physics is fraught with pitfalls. All those funny symbols and odd
equations. Combine that with programming and it is something I'm glad YOU
are attmpting and not me.
dave henrie

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:37:40

> >are there any pitfalls one should be aware of when using Brian
> >Beckman's series as reference for implementing a simple simulator?

> Just that most of it is unorthodox and books generally take a
> different route. But any route is ok, as long as you can follow it
> enough to program it. :)

sounds great. I'm on a (very) strict budget, and those SAE-books are
a bit to expensive for my tastes.

Thanks for the input.
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"Det er nok ingen ovn, men fartsm?leren v?r."

rec.autos.simulators

the Physics of Racing

the Physics of Racing

the Physics of Racing

the Physics of Racing

the Physics of Racing