> [1] Though why not? Who *cares* if it gets out that (say) Ferrari are
> in discussions with the Wests? We all know they'd like to have a
> Ferrari licence anyway, so why is swirling rumour better than hard
> fact? There's far too much justifying any level of secrecy by "it's
> commercially sensitive, dontchaknow" - a great deal of it
> unnecessary. We need a sea change in the way these things work - so
> that a game maker can say "well, we're talking to Ferrari, but I
> don't know what the outcome will be for a while. Looks reasonably
> promising, though".
"WRL got the ferrari!" got thrown around the net, and then, when the
game finally arrived, it'd get pounded for not having the promised
Ferraris after all.
--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"a poster is a human being or the software equivalent"