On Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:50:38 -0600, Jon Van Ginneken
>Will do next time I make a quick referance just as long as you agree to read my main
>arguement (this GPL thing was to mention GPL has it's faults like anything else). My
>point was we cannot judge a game by it's screenshots, if that were the case SCGT would
>beat GPL hands down, which you didn't argue;
Actually I do argue with that statement, quite a lot in fact. If you
choose to judge the quality of a product by dint of the advertising
released by the company making it then you can't be surprised when
your opinion is skewed. Papy released a video or two during
development (to let us know how the game _moved_) but screenshots were
small 320x200 affairs made by *** sites or mags. On top of that,
SCGT still has the "rose-tinted glasses" syndrome, since we all WANT
it to be great. If you take a few screenshots of GPL, perhaps from
around Spa say, it looks a lot better than what SCGT currently offers
(IMO at least) - those car models are really in need of work. I've
driven BMW M3s for a number of years and believe me they look nothing
like the ones in SCGT. To my mind the tracks in SCGT lack atmosphere,
looking too clinical. On top of that there looks like there will be
quite a bit of pop-up in the graphics as you can often see large
objects in the mid-background aren't yet drawn. Still, it's only a
screenshot and it's well before release - I'm not going to be crying
into my cornflakes, but I'm not reading too much into them either.
If that is the case, why do you bother to post your opinions if you
then want to ask people not to state theirs, and why go to all the
trouble of posting a long response? Pot, kettle, black?
If you class it as "bickering" whenever someone doesn't share your
opinion then that is probably the first thing to look at. When you
classify someone's response as a "madiocre excuse" you're not exactly
going out of your way to avoid confrontational messages either.
Cheers!
John