rec.autos.simulators

       As some of you may have noticed the patch seems to have changed
the physics of DTR. The stagger and tire wear seem to have a much
greater effect than before. Plus the cars seem quite a bit looser at least
with my setups. So I have started redoing them and hopefully they will
get posted shortly. I have sent Jure my redone setups for Shawano and
Muskogee and they are very stable. I was able to hit 16.96 at Shawano
and 18.44 at Muskogee. The driving line for both setups remains the
same from  the previous guide.

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

    Pete

       As some of you may have noticed the patch seems to have changed
the physics of DTR. The stagger and tire wear seem to have a much
greater effect than before. Plus the cars seem quite a bit looser at least
with my setups. So I have started redoing them and hopefully they will
get posted shortly. I have sent Jure my redone setups for Shawano and
Muskogee and they are very stable. I was able to hit 16.96 at Shawano
and 18.44 at Muskogee. The driving line for both setups remains the
same from  the previous guide.

http://www.bhmotorsports.com/

    Pete

       As some of you may have noticed the patch seems to have changed
the physics of DTR. The stagger and tire wear seem to have a much
greater effect than before. Plus the cars seem quite a bit looser at least
with my setups. So I have started redoing them and hopefully they will
get posted shortly. I have sent Jure my redone setups for Shawano and
Muskogee and they are very stable. I was able to hit 16.96 at Shawano
and 18.44 at Muskogee. The driving line for both setups remains the
same from  the previous guide.

http://www.bhmotorsports.com/

    Pete

       As some of you may have noticed the patch seems to have changed
the physics of DTR. The stagger and tire wear seem to have a much
greater effect than before. Plus the cars seem quite a bit looser at least
with my setups. So I have started redoing them and hopefully they will
get posted shortly. I have sent Jure my redone setups for Shawano and
Muskogee and they are very stable. I was able to hit 16.96 at Shawano
and 18.44 at Muskogee. The driving line for both setups remains the
same from  the previous guide.

http://www.bhmotorsports.com/

    Pete

       As some of you may have noticed the patch seems to have changed
the physics of DTR. The stagger and tire wear seem to have a much
greater effect than before. Plus the cars seem quite a bit looser at least
with my setups. So I have started redoing them and hopefully they will
get posted shortly. I have sent Jure my redone setups for Shawano and
Muskogee and they are very stable. I was able to hit 16.96 at Shawano
and 18.44 at Muskogee. The driving line for both setups remains the
same from  the previous guide.

http://www.bhmotorsports.com/

    Pete

One question I have on DTR setups in general is how they can have
separate setting for left and right FRONT toe-in. Front-end alignment
specs always just give a TOTAL toe-in (or out), since the front wheels
are connected together by the tie-rod. For example, if you have a setup
of LF = -1.0 and RF = +2.9, this would seem to be the same as a front-
end setting of +1.9. You could set the LF at 0.0 and RF at 1.9 and it
would be the same effect. I guess that the settings that you make
indicate the toe-in when the steering wheel is in the "straight up"
position, but it's never in that position for long anyway :-). Most
setups that I've seen tend to split the setting between the wheels (in
the above case, both at 0.9 or 1.0).

  Doug G

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Thanks, --mK

    Pete

    Pete