Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank:-1.680
MonsterRank: +334.169
N2002 Rank:+17.59
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
>> Apparently Alldata has been informed about the newsgroup abuse.
>>Unfortunately, I'm now a target.
> Target from whom - the pirates, or AllData?
> Eldred
dave henrie
> >> Apparently Alldata has been informed about the newsgroup abuse.
> >>Unfortunately, I'm now a target.
> > Target from whom - the pirates, or AllData?
> > Eldred
> zee Pirates...I have not hid my name or address. (never said I was
> clever)
> dave henrie
steve
> > >> Apparently Alldata has been informed about the newsgroup abuse.
> > >>Unfortunately, I'm now a target.
> > > Target from whom - the pirates, or AllData?
> > > Eldred
> > zee Pirates...I have not hid my name or address. (never said I was
> > clever)
> > dave henrie
Well the main poster was quiet for most of the week but is really
pumping out the stuff lately. I searched over the net for info about
killing the newsgroup and didn't find much info. I did get a few replies
that basically said the providers like Road Runner and attbi make thier
money from the fishes that suck up the files, so they are not inclined to
administer them. Of course a small company like all data can't afford the
legal fees to chase these guys.
My next brilliant idea, doomed to fail like all others, is to get an
online petition going and present it to the various providers providers
that are the current pipeline for the file abuse. rr.com, easynews.com,
Pretty much we are swimming upstream against these guys.
dave henrie
I don't get it, what is the problem exactly? Sorry I don't know the details.
Here's a very recent example, Binnews.com use to use a.b.triballs as there 0
day release forum, the kids didn't like that you had to pay to get access
to the file names and the bombed the group.
muster and they failed.
Hope this helps,
Tony RoZe
____________________
Please don't post html.
The problem is that on those occasions where someone genuinely wants to use
the newsgroup, the files are 'pushed' off the server before many get the
chance to download the complete file.
Dave and the others are attempting to turn the tables & perform the same
trick on them.
If someone continually put their trash in your bin, so much that you
couldn't fit all your own trash in, it'd annoy you. This is similar.
I don't really think they'll give up, but I can't blame Dave for trying.
Thanks for your interest and assistance.Sorry for any inconvienience,
Jeff
I think because I have been the most visible, they assumed it was me.
What I found funny was somebody complained because I posted clearly marked
sim videos but I used the name Confused-- as my name. (the big distributor
currently uses the name Confused) They thought I was being cheap. :)
I guess there is.....honor...amoung...thieves..... NOT!
dave henrie
No inconvience...You'd think that folks who don't want the world to
notice what they are doing, would slink away to another group rather than
stay publicly visible.
dave henrie
> Jeff
>> Oh I see, so someone is using the sim binaries to upload another NGs
> stuff?
However it didn't list exactly as I uploaded it.
I got the first part correct, but then instead of the name of the
attachment I just got a generic 1/2 attachment so it stood out like a sore
thumb. Actually the first test was (DOH!) under my own name again, not
Confused's.
But anyhow...if we could camouflage the file to look just like the
original, it would then be sorted under the same header. Getting a corrupt
file in random portions of a file might tend to***off the dloaders. We
might posibly dload whole threads, and reupload them again. But getting
the size of the upload to match the original is again over my head.
So what you are doing doesn't even get noticed by them.
Keep trying :o)
> However it didn't list exactly as I uploaded it.
> I got the first part correct, but then instead of the name of the
> attachment I just got a generic 1/2 attachment so it stood out like a sore
> thumb. Actually the first test was (DOH!) under my own name again, not
> Confused's.
> But anyhow...if we could camouflage the file to look just like the
> original, it would then be sorted under the same header. Getting a
corrupt
> file in random portions of a file might tend to***off the dloaders. We
> might posibly dload whole threads, and reupload them again. But getting
> the size of the upload to match the original is again over my head.