rec.autos.simulators

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

DickSmi

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by DickSmi » Thu, 18 May 1995 04:00:00

Yes!!!!   Please..!!!!

Doesn't the Amiga have its own NewsGroup?

ICRS'

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by ICRS' » Fri, 19 May 1995 04:00:00



>Subject: Re: IndyCar(TM) Racing II News
>Date: 16 May 1995 16:34:14 GMT


>>As I understand it, IndyCar 2.0 will NOT provide support for
>>multiplayer (more than 2 player) user-user LANs.

>>This is a feature which I personally desire *more than any other
>>change* to IndyCar. (Novell Netware LAN support)
>        This is even harder than my desire to have an editor.  The
>arcade game VR Racing can have (or so I've heard) up to 32 machines
>connected and I doubt they use something as slow as Novell.  Also, these
>machines have purpose built chips that make the Pentium look like a dog
>(ok, it is).  In theory, it should be possible on a 10Mbits+ LAN, but it
>will all depend on how the software is written and how much info must be
>moved on the wire.
>bryon
>ps- see Ralf, I do have a clue.

Bryon, you direct your post at ME and I had nothing to do with the post you
referred to.  Now if that's not a sign that you need a clue, I don't know what
is. Not once did I mentionthe "ARCADE" game VR Racing or even it's sister
games, Daytona and Virtua Racing.  That's a whole different format and and
entirely different chipset involved, dedicated solely to those games.  Don't
try to confuse the issue by comparing them to PC games.

By the way, since you brought up VR Racing AND you don't care about posting
continuity, you happen to have a track editor handy for VR Racing?

Didn't think so.

Ralf

  ____   __    ___    __   ____   __

 _\ \  /(__)\ |  (  /(__)\  )(  /(__)\  http://www.webcom.com/~sabata/

ICRS'

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by ICRS' » Fri, 19 May 1995 04:00:00


>I don't think it's realistic to expect Papyrus or Microprose to release
>track editors, but I do wish they would release the file formats, like
>id did for Doom.

I LOVE playing Doom, and even I can tell the difference between a game like
Doom and a racing simulator like ICR or WorldCircuit.  They are two entirely
different crayons in the crayola box.

Perhaps the incredibly talented people at iD would be willing to create a
Racing Sim that allows users to create tracks, etc.  Then again, maybe they
are smart people and realize that would be catering to a smaller audience than
they'd care to work for.

Perhaps someone is already to close to doing so.  My hat's off to this person.
 I suggest s/he check in on this group and put to rest this stupendous request
from the hundreds of people wishing to create their own tracks, or edit
existing ones.

If you're out there, please let us know, so that we can get back to
constructive discussions concerning racing sims as opposed to games.

Ralf

  ____   __    ___    __   ____   __

 _\ \  /(__)\ |  (  /(__)\  )(  /(__)\  http://www.webcom.com/~sabata/

Keiron Ra

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Keiron Ra » Fri, 19 May 1995 04:00:00

Hi All



And received the following response:



>>>Subject: Re: IndyCar(TM) Racing II News
>>>Date: 16 May 1995 16:34:14 GMT
>>>This is even harder than my desire to have an editor.
>>>arcade game VR Racing can have (or so I've heard) up to 32 machines
>>>connected and I doubt they use something as slow as Novell.  Also, these
>>>machines have purpose built chips that make the Pentium look like a dog
>>>(ok, it is).  In theory, it should be possible on a 10Mbits+ LAN, but it
>>>will all depend on how the software is written and how much info must be
>>>moved on the wire.
>>>bryon
>>>ps- see Ralf, I do have a clue.


[much deleted]

Says it all Ralf.

I like to make it clear that I too have absolutely no desire for a
track editor which essentially would turn the SIM into an arcade game.

From the response I have received so far, it also appears no-one much
cares about having  LAN support.

BTW Byron, (and I welcome further comment or correction here if
someone out there better informed can illuminate the technical issues
more clearly), if Papyrus can get ICR working well over an analogue
phone system, a Novell net of 4 - 8 drivable cars with the rest of the
field computer controlled wouldn't exactly present them or 10 Mbps
ethernet/twisted pair with a major dilemma, and would be significantly
easier to write than creating 'Byronworld' using a  "track editor"
with all the variables you desire...IMHO.

Regards

Keiron
* Compuserve:    100241,714                          *

* Fidonet:       3:640/301                           *
   from Keiron Rado in Brisbane, Qld, Australia     *  

DickSmi

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by DickSmi » Fri, 19 May 1995 04:00:00



> I'd like to remove all the chicanes from Monza and restore the 2nd
> Lesmo turn to its pre-1994 status.  This will bring me back to the
> original 50s track.  Then I'd like to restore the Indy-like ring so I
> can get the 10Kms track they run on a couple of times (By the way, it
> was something like this
> of the reality (no injuries).  So, why couln't I be allowed to better
> the reality to a further degree by creating new tracks for my
> personal use (I won't force you to run on them...) and for the people
> who'll like them?
> Paolo Montrasio

I believe that there are some valid uses for a track editor and you
pointed out some.  However, this thread was started by an idiot who
suggested that we boycott Papyrus because THEY did not wish to make a
track editor ala' Doom!

I suspect that he wanted to do a figure 8 track and play smash 'em up
and port it to Sega or his Amiga

ICRS'

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by ICRS' » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00



>Subject: Re: Track Editing (was IndyCar(TM) Racing II News)
>Date: 19 May 1995 01:03:58 GMT

>>I LOVE playing Doom, and even I can tell the difference between a game
>>like
>>Doom and a racing simulator like ICR or WorldCircuit.  They are two
>>entirely
>>different crayons in the crayola box.
>        No kidding Ralph.  Duh.  Why do you think you are the smartest
>person on the planet?

And YOU wonder why I spell your name Byron, when you still can't spell my
name.  You pay such close attention to detail.

Ralf

  ____   __    ___    __   ____   __

 _\ \  /(__)\ |  (  /(__)\  )(  /(__)\  http://www.webcom.com/~sabata/

Paolo Montras

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Paolo Montras » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00


[referring to someone wishing to write a track editor]

 It seems to me that you think that:

 1) if you have ICR-like program and you can only run on real tracks,
 then this is a racing simulator,

 2) if you can use the same program to run on non-real tracks, then it
 becomes a game (should I say: it downgrades to game?)

 I'd like to remove all the chicanes from Monza and restore the 2nd
 Lesmo turn to its pre-1994 status.  This will bring me back to the
 original 50s track.  Then I'd like to restore the Indy-like ring so I
 can get the 10Kms track they run on a couple of times (By the way, it
 was something like this

          ----.
         /     |
         \      |
          \      |
           \      \ ___________________
           |      /\                   --_
           |     |  `-----------------_   \
           |     |                     `   |
           |      \                    |   |
           \       -__________________-' _/
            `__________________________--

 So, is this a legitimate simulation use of a car racing program or it
 is just console stuff?

 And, believe me, ICR, NASCAR and F1GP *are* just games.  They will
 become simulations the day you'll get hurt crashing on a wall.  Until
 then, they are just programs attempting to give you the feeling of
 driving a racing car and to do that they have to better some aspects
 of the reality (no injuries).  So, why couln't I be allowed to better
 the reality to a further degree by creating new tracks for my
 personal use (I won't force you to run on them...) and for the people
 who'll like them?

 Paolo Montrasio

--

 WWW:   http://www.physics.sunysb.edu/~montra/       ETNOTEAM S.p.A.
 Tel:   +39-2-26126-207/276                          via A. Cairoli Bono 34
 Fax:   +39-2-26110755                               I-20127 Milano, Italy

Bryon La

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Bryon La » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00


        No kidding Ralph.  Duh.  Why do you think you are the smartest
person on the planet?

        It is both a game and sim.

bsl
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
If I were but what I was, I would not be anything but what I were.
Bryon S. Lape
Hodges Library in the department formerly known as "Automation"
Proud owner of two songs banned from MTV.
Suffering from political correctness deficiency syndrome.

ICRS'

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by ICRS' » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00



>Subject: Re: Track Editing (was IndyCar(TM) Racing II News)
>Date: 19 May 1995 01:03:58 GMT

>>I LOVE playing Doom, and even I can tell the difference between a game
>>like
>>Doom and a racing simulator like ICR or WorldCircuit.  They are two
>>entirely
>>different crayons in the crayola box.
>        No kidding Ralph.  Duh.  Why do you think you are the smartest
>person on the planet?

Good question, Boron.  I can't answer that.  How about you?  Whay you YOU
think I am the samrtest person on the planet, as you stated above?  Or did you
forget to insert a comma?

Forget what I said yesterday, this is fun.  It has been a long time since I've
seen such a display of idiocy.  Keep it up.  Bring it on.  I'm salivating at
the prospect of reading more bullshit eminating from your pea-brain.  C'mon.

Ralf

  ____   __    ___    __   ____   __

 _\ \  /(__)\ |  (  /(__)\  )(  /(__)\  http://www.webcom.com/~sabata/

Nicolas Champag

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Nicolas Champag » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00


> Can I canvass how many other users desire multiplayer (>2 player) LAN
> support as a major priority for ICR 2.0??
> Speak up now and let Papyrus marketing managment know, or forever hold
> your peace, as it isn't planned for inclusion according to the
> response I have from Papyrus.

If I understood correctly, you seem to implied that ICR 2.0 will have
support for Online multiplayer. I assume that by Online you mean
major services like Compuserve and AOL. Does it also include
support for multiplayer over the Internet. That would be great.

I, personnaly, would prefer to see these support (be it online,
Internet or Lan)  to be in the form of add-on package rather than to
be included in the game so that to keep the price down.  Furthermore,
these add-on can be release later on, thus allowing to deliver ICR 2.0
earlier.

Thanks

Nicolas

Chas

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Chas » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00


>Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
>Path:
>news.cac.psu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!harb
>inger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!iccu6!news

>Subject: Re: IndyCar(TM) Racing II News


>Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 22:47:47 GMT
>X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ppp5.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au



>Organization: Global Infolinks Internet Server, Ipswich Qld Australia
>X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.46
>Lines: 66
>Hi All


>>>>>As I understand it, IndyCar 2.0 will NOT provide support for
>>>>>multiplayer (more than 2 player) user-user LANs.

>>>>>This is a feature which I personally desire *more than any other
>>>>>change* to IndyCar. (Novell Netware LAN support)
>And received the following response:

>writes:

>>>>Subject: Re: IndyCar(TM) Racing II News
>>>>Date: 16 May 1995 16:34:14 GMT
>>>>This is even harder than my desire to have an editor.
>>>>arcade game VR Racing can have (or so I've heard) up to 32 machines
>>>>connected and I doubt they use something as slow as Novell.  Also, these
>>>>machines have purpose built chips that make the Pentium look like a dog
>>>>(ok, it is).  In theory, it should be possible on a 10Mbits+ LAN, but it
>>>>will all depend on how the software is written and how much info must be
>>>>moved on the wire.
>>>>bryon
>>>>ps- see Ralf, I do have a clue.

>>>Bryon, you direct your post at ME and I had nothing to do with the post you
>>>referred to.
>[much deleted]
>>>Ralf
>Says it all Ralf.
>I like to make it clear that I too have absolutely no desire for a
>track editor which essentially would turn the SIM into an arcade game.
>From the response I have received so far, it also appears no-one much
>cares about having  LAN support.
>BTW Byron, (and I welcome further comment or correction here if
>someone out there better informed can illuminate the technical issues
>more clearly), if Papyrus can get ICR working well over an analogue
>phone system, a Novell net of 4 - 8 drivable cars with the rest of the
>field computer controlled wouldn't exactly present them or 10 Mbps
>ethernet/twisted pair with a major dilemma, and would be significantly
>easier to write than creating 'Byronworld' using a  "track editor"
>with all the variables you desire...IMHO.
>Regards
>Keiron

Let me jump in and add my two cents at this point. I just found this group and
have been trying to catch up on my reading.

I also just returned from Indy qualifying and played the new version at
Fanfest.  I had the chance to talk to the Papyrus rep for quite a while while
waiting in line.  

First off, The version being played was a beta copy of SVGA indycar, with
network support.  They were running a novel network with ethernet cards and
the commercial version should be out Aug - Sep. time frame, and it will
support multiplayer mode over LAN.  

As for track editors, he told methey use AutoCAD to design tracks, and then
the completed track is imported into the game somehow.  My limited knowldege
of game programming prohibited a more indepth discussion of how it's compiled.

If you really want more information, the guys name is David Matson, and I'm
sure you could write him, fe seemed to be a pretty nice guy, at

Bryon La

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by Bryon La » Sat, 20 May 1995 04:00:00


says...
[Awesome article by Paolo Montrasio deleted]

        Schurmann stands up and gives a cheer.  Way to go Paolo.  You
tell 'um!

bryon

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
If I were but what I was, I would not be anything but what I were.
Bryon S. Lape
Hodges Library in the department formerly known as "Automation"
Proud owner of two songs banned from MTV.
Suffering from political correctness deficiency syndrome.

ICRS'

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by ICRS' » Sun, 21 May 1995 04:00:00


> And, believe me, ICR, NASCAR and F1GP *are* just games.  They will
> become simulations the day you'll get hurt crashing on a wall.  Until
> then, they are just programs attempting to give you the feeling of
> driving a racing car and to do that they have to better some aspects
> of the reality (no injuries).  So, why couln't I be allowed to better
> the reality to a further degree by creating new tracks for my
> personal use (I won't force you to run on them...) and for the people
> who'll like them?
> Paolo Montrasio

Okay, as far as CIR being more of a game than a sim, I won't argue that, for
it could go on forever.  Microsoft Flight Simulator 5.0 doesn't allow you to
actually *feel* the G's in a dive or take on an injury when crashing either.  
Nontheless, it IS a flight simulator, and it is used in many flightschools to
prepare pilots for the more advanced simulators and eventually actual flight.  
ICR is just as much a simulator from a technical point of view in that it
concentrates a lot on car setup, the mechanics and physics.  I don't have to
get sensory and tactile feedback to simulate auto racing to the extent ICR
does it for me.

My comments in reference to track editors and such are specifically aimed at
IndyCar Racing by Papyrus, which is a sim/game that serves a purpose, and has
no need of editors of that type.  If someone wants to create a racing sim that
allows the creation of customs tracks, I encourage them to do so.  But to
expect it to come from IndyCar Racing by Papyrus is merely asking Papyrus to
do the bulk of the work for you ("you" in general terms).  If that person
wants such a game/sim, write it.

Ralf

  ____   __    ___    __   ____   __

 _\ \  /(__)\ |  (  /(__)\  )(  /(__)\  http://www.webcom.com/~sabata/

khu..

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by khu.. » Mon, 22 May 1995 04:00:00


>  If I understood correctly, you seem to implied that ICR 2.0 will have
>  support for Online multiplayer. I assume that by Online you mean
>  major services like Compuserve and AOL. Does it also include
>  support for multiplayer over the Internet. That would be great.

>  I, personnaly, would prefer to see these support (be it online,
>  Internet or Lan)  to be in the form of add-on package rather than to
>  be included in the game so that to keep the price down.  Furthermore,
>  these add-on can be release later on, thus allowing to deliver ICR 2.0
>  earlier.

>  Thanks

>  Nicolas

 Papyrus is actually starting there own online service.  I don't think
there's a name for it yet.  But from what I read earlier it'll be a
800 number service, mainly because there's too much of a delay in POP
services like SprintNet.  With the 800 number, your calling the server
directly which means it'll be as fast a regular modem H2H game.  

****************************************************************

Hartsdale, NY        "BsOiRgInNaGture"         Cloud 9 Internet
****************************************************************

RickGent

IndyCar(TM) Racing II News

by RickGent » Tue, 23 May 1995 04:00:00

I also just returned from Indy qualifying and played the new version at
Fanfest.  I had the chance to talk to the Papyrus rep for quite a while
while
waiting in line.  

First off, The version being played was a beta copy of SVGA indycar, with
network support.  They were running a novel network with ethernet cards
and
the commercial version should be out Aug - Sep. time frame, and it will
support multiplayer mode over LAN.  
<<<

I think you misunderstood.

What we showed at Fanfest was specially made just for Fanfest. It was not
ICR 2.0. It did have SVGA-quality car definitions, but did not have the
new artwork being developed for ICR 2.0.

Furthermore, while yes, we do run multiplayer testing in-house over a
Novell network, there are no plans at this time to release such a product.
The multiplayer service is a dial-in service provided by Papyrus through
which you can race against other players in various leagues. Again, there
is no plan at this time to release a multiplayer, network version of ICR
or NASCAR.

Rick Genter
Technical Lead, IndyCar Racing 2.0
Papyrus Design Group, Inc.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.