I knew I'd get in trouble for posting this, but I still feel it's a
legitimate complaint. I'll post my e-mail response below.
>> Gee, thanks. It's this kind of attitude on Hawaii that makes it so
>> tough to even join a race against good competition. Everyone starts
>> somewhere, but I've noticed that most of the 8 on up level racers
>> either nominate a race at level 5 or above. So how does someone raise
>> their level if they can't race against them? This elitist ***has
>> gotta go.
>> David Range
>> "DJR" on Hawaii
>It has nothing to do with elitism.. many of us have lost skill points
>repeatedly by being crashed out of races. Once you are a level 8 or
>higher (which could be sooner than you think), you too, will not want
>to join races with unknown quantities.
I understand your point. Now let me explain mine. I currently run 186
to 187's at Atlanta, 189-190's at Michigan, etc. I've had races where
I've been knocked out by higher and lower level racers. I've even
(unfortunately) knocked out other racers, for which I apologize. It
was a mistake, nothing more. It happens in real life, as it does on
Hawaii. To blame ALL low level racers for these crashes is unfair,
and makes it harder for them to move up the ladder, much less race
against the upper level drivers. For instance, say there was a level
7-15 race at Michigan, and say a racer that everyone respected and
knew could race couldn't because he was a Level 5. I don't race
against upper level drivers to gain points, but to learn from them.
Without the better racers , how can we expect these bad racers to
learn?
I agree. But it doesn't solve the problem as a whole. What I'd like to
see is an addition to the nominate window allowing the person who
nominated the race to allow drivers in not only on their skill rating
but also by their reputattion. If the other drivers agree to allow
that racer in, they can join.
David Range