I try to keep an eye on the board, but a lot of my actual commentary is
either pre-empted by the people on the board offering what I would offer; or
someone on r.a.s. has first hand knowledge of a problem which I haven't
experienced (certain hardware configs which I don't have - my system is a
straight forward P2-266 with a TNT and an SLI config and a Maxi Sound card);
or problems which we have received through email already. In some cases of
course, I also don't know the answer...admittedly not the best of
situations.
But yes, I do try to respond here, it is pseudo official as I have
officially been requested to monitor newsgroups, but my postings are
probably more casual than they should be.
As for the two way street, I agree, unfortunately it always seems that by
the time the product is out to receive input it is too late to modify the
program since another project has priority etc. This seems to be changing
somewhat on the North American front with gamer forums and QA sessions such
as those which were held with Speed Busters, hopefully that will continue
and show results from such QA sessions.
>>>>I keep an eye on that site, and direct people to f1racingsim for most
>things, but it is often better to have a direct enumeration with all the
>information collated than sifting through a forum when you want to know
>something.<<<
>Well can at least we say that UBI is going to have a presence on both
boards
>from now on? It would be nice to have at lease SOME representation and
>feedback from the publisher. Sometimes it seems that there is just a whole
lot
>of preaching on one's soapbox and nothing ever comes out of it.
>Alot of people want to see this sim really mature into what it has the
potental
>to become...the best 'modern' F1-Racing Sim. But in order for this to
happen,
>it must be a 2-way street for both sides.
>:::Stepping off of soapbox:::
>F1Filter