MOMO stack up against the TSW in areas of drivability, feel on the track,
speed, etc.
Thanks
Thanks
pez
> Thanks
Mitch
--
Remove "nospam." to reply.
SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a
>> Other than the obvious price difference (and one being FF), how does the
>> MOMO stack up against the TSW in areas of drivability, feel on the track,
>> speed, etc.
>> Thanks
> I couldnt imagine GTR of Rfactor without Force Feedback.
> Mitch
I own a TSW and have tried the Momo several times at a friend's place,
and for me the TSW is more "sturdy" and feels more solid, esp. with
the ball bearing shaft. Also, the TSW pedals have more travel than the
Momo ones which feel kind of "plasticky" for lack of a better term.
I might guess the TSW is easier to maintain in the long run, but I
have never seen an open Momo.
Cheers,
uwe
--
GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
Kendt
>>> Other than the obvious price difference (and one being FF), how does the
>>> MOMO stack up against the TSW in areas of drivability, feel on the
>>> track, speed, etc.
>>> Thanks
>> I couldnt imagine GTR of Rfactor without Force Feedback.
>> Mitch
> FF doesn't add anything for me in simracing, it's a distraction more
> than anything else (but that might be just me).
> I own a TSW and have tried the Momo several times at a friend's place,
> and for me the TSW is more "sturdy" and feels more solid, esp. with
> the ball bearing shaft. Also, the TSW pedals have more travel than the
> Momo ones which feel kind of "plasticky" for lack of a better term.
> I might guess the TSW is easier to maintain in the long run, but I
> have never seen an open Momo.
> Cheers,
> uwe
I never cared for the FF in NR2003 and I never tried with GPL but the new
titles (GTR, RFactor) the FF seems to be much more than just an "effect"
and gives very very good feedback.
Just last night in an RFactor race I was thinking what a great tactile
feeling it is going over the rumble strips with either left or right side
of the car. I could tell which side I was on with a blindfold on, could
you with your TSW ;) In fact Id bet I could make it all the way around
Toban Short with a blindfold on using just the FF. You can really tell
what surface youre on. It may not be perfect yet but its close and every
tiny bit of feedback we can get while sitting in front of a monitor is
beneficial imvho.
Mitch
--
Remove "nospam." to reply.
SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a
MItch
--
Remove "nospam." to reply.
SuSE 9.2 Pro KDE 3.3.2a
> Thanks
TSW: Good: Easily maintained (ie - replacing pots)
Solid as a rock
Great Pedals (although I think the design has changed quite
a bit on the latest TSW's)
Wheel has a nice feel to it
Not-so-good: No Force Feedback
MOMO Force: Good: Force Feedback (Yes it IS worthwhile in modern sims -
especially after some tweaking).
6 assignable buttons on wheel
Leather wrap on wheel is very nice.
Not-so-good: Pedals really are poor in comparison to TSW -- too
little travel
After being very happy with my TSW, I found that I wanted FF, so I
bought the MOMO. Now, I still have both hooked up to my system. I use
the TSW peds thru the gameport and the MOMO wheel thru USB, with sims
like GTR, GPL, NR2003, RBR, F1C, etc. Unfortunately, I still have to
have the MOMO peds and TSW wheel hooked up to make this work, so it take
up a lot of space on the floor.
FWIW: I also have used the MOMO Racing. While it is not as solidly
built as the MOMO Force, it's FF effects are a bit better out-of-the box
IMO. The wheel feels good in the hands (no leather wrap though), but I
had a problem with the paddle shifters breaking. (Cheap plastic) I've
heard that this issue has since been resolved, though. The MOMO Racing
peds are nicer than the MOMO Force's, but still nowhere near TSW's.
I hope this helps you in your decision.
Same here. Appreciate what they're trying to do, but in use it feels
unnatural; like a PC peripheral & not a car's steering wheel - which ruins
the immersion for me.
Interesting to read in the latest AutoSimSport that the developer of the
$26,000 Force Dynamics motion simulator tested and ultimately discarded the
use of Immersion-based FF devices because they were out of synch with the
rest of the physics output due to device latency. Which has long been an
issue with current FF technology; I seem to recall Kaemmer, Wests, etc.
opining along the same lines over the last few years.
SB
http://tytlandsvik.no/momo/
--
Jone Tytlandsvik
http://tytlandsvik.no
mailto: firstname at lastname dot no