rec.autos.simulators

GP2->survey

Eric Cot

GP2->survey

by Eric Cot » Mon, 21 Oct 1996 04:00:00

Hello all GP2 FAN,here's a little survey i would like to conduct.
I will ask you to give me your CPU speed,and please use same setup as
what i have done.

1-GRAPHIC DETAIL:TRACKSIDE OBJECT ON MEDIUM LEVEL
2-USE AS MANY OTHER DETAIL AS YOU WISH (more on this later)
3-TRY TO KEEP FRAME RATE (actual) between 13.2 - 23.2
4-CHOOSE VIEW MODE ONLY (don't drive yourself)

Now,i'll tell you what i have done (what i want you to do),i have chose
different tracks (6),with the graphic menu, i have chose some details to
keep ESTIMATE FRAME RATE as high as possible(DON'T GO HIGHER than >25),
and (VERY IMPORTANT) chose FRAME RATE lower than ESTIMATE. So the trick
is to try to keep PROCESSOR OCCUPANCY (on a given track) close to 100%
(average on 1 lap).

So the question is how lower your FRAME RATE level is compared to
ESTIMATE FRAME RATE ie (ex:ESTIMATE 25.1, what i actually use 21.3 so
it's 2 LEVEL LOWER than ESTIMATE (25.1, 23.2, 21.3, 19.6 etc...))
to keep PROCCESSOR OCCUPANCY close to 100% when viewing a driver
in PRACTICE MODE on a GIVEN TRACK.

note:to know how it's 100% (average) use a stopwatch and measure ACTUAL
TIME VS ESTIMATE TIME (by GP2 CHRONO),when BOTH TIME are EQUAL you're
at 100 % P/O (see my previous post GP2->real time)

CIRCUITS used:

Montreal (Canada) TRACKSIDE ON, MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 3 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE

Adelaide (Austalia) TRACKSIDE ON,MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 5 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE

Suzuka (Japan)     TRACKSIDE ON,MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 4 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE

Monaco (Monaco)    TRACKSIDE ON,MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 9 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE (ouch!)

Estoril (Portugal) TRACKSIDE ON,MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 5 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE

Silverstone (UK)   TRACKSIDE ON,MEDIUM DETAIL
FRAME RATE (actual) 4 LEVEL lower than ESTIMATE

***** note:all other GRAPHIC DETAIL is up to your preference (as long
      as you keep P/O at = or <100%) but i will ask you not to choose
      SKY,SMOKE,HILLS. Up to you for SVGA or VGA mode (again F/R as as
      possible please).

My own pc is 486dx4 (i'm going for P166 next weekend),thanks for all
your reply VIA NEWSGROUP,Eric

(snip here)
***********************************************************************RESULTS:
          ACTUAL F/R how many # LEVEL LOWER than ESTIMATE(type # only)
  Montreal:
  Adelaide:
    Suzuka:
    Monaco:
   Estoril:
Siverstone:

   CPU USED:
SVGA or VGA:

************************************************************************One more Question,have you found a difference between VIEWING ONLY and
ACTUAL PRACTICE in terms FRAME RATE vs ESTIMATE FRAME RATE, my own slow
pc (not for long) gives me a LOWER LEVEL of minus 1-2 (actual practice)
compared to viewing only.
Thanks again.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.