rec.autos.simulators

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

Don Wilsh

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Don Wilsh » Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:28:37

Guys:

I know this is little off topic, but if you are a motorhead you might find
my latest
venture interesting.   I own a company that is developing Enviromental
Sparking Technology for the 21st Century.  Our Goal,  and we have just
received
three (3) Patents,  is to improve the power of gasoline, ***, ethanol,
etc by
30% or reduce your fuel consumption by 30%.  Basically unused power via
more efficent burning of fuel gives better gas mileage.

We started at looking what was wrong with the concurrent spark plug
technology.   Alot of the fuel you burn in your engines from V8's to
weed wackers isnt burned.  Its wasted.  So we decided to look how
we could improve that.  Yes you have heard of all the latest technology f
from Champion, Autolite, Split-Fire, Bosch, NGK, Nippon Denso, etc.  They
all make claims, but they are all single spark systems.   We decided to
not only have multiple 2 to 4 sparks, but to change the concept of how
we apply the spark to the cylinder.   We started with a multihead spark
plug that fires all electrodes concurrently and not randomly serially.  Than
we went beyond that concept to eliminating the spark plug all together with
our Ring of Fire Concept.  Instead of localizing the spark to a single area
of the cylinder we determined that we could redesign the heads and
headgaskets to spark.   This would allow even spark distribution
conconcurrently around the cylinder.   You can see more and come
back as the site is still being completed at
[color=#FF6633]www.syncrofire.com[/color].  We
are working with the  webmaster now to correct and update the graphic.

What are the benefits we perceive.

1).   30% more power in your engine.  Take a 300 HP engine and make a 400
HP.
2).   Reduce your fuel consumption by 30%.
3).  Imagine reducing fuel imports by 30%
4).  The applications are anything that has a motor and a spark.  From
V8's, Weed Wackers, Model Airplane, Briggs and Strattons, etc etc.

If you want to work with us somehow just email us at Syncrofire.

Don Wilshe
1st Enviro Safety
www.1stenvirosafety.com
www.syncrofire.com

Mitch_

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Mitch_ » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:17:27

Did Slitfire's patent run out? ;)


Mitch_

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Mitch_ » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:17:59

Ooops, I meant Splitfire


> Did Slitfire's patent run out? ;)



> > Guys:

> > I know this is little off topic, but if you are a motorhead you might
find
> > my latest
> > venture interesting.   I own a company that is developing Enviromental
> > Sparking Technology for the 21st Century.  Our Goal,  and we have just
> > received
> > three (3) Patents,  is to improve the power of gasoline, ***,
ethanol,
> > etc by
> > 30% or reduce your fuel consumption by 30%.  Basically unused power via
> > more efficent burning of fuel gives better gas mileage.

> > We started at looking what was wrong with the concurrent spark plug
> > technology.   Alot of the fuel you burn in your engines from V8's to
> > weed wackers isnt burned.  Its wasted.  So we decided to look how
> > we could improve that.  Yes you have heard of all the latest technology
f
> > from Champion, Autolite, Split-Fire, Bosch, NGK, Nippon Denso, etc.
They
> > all make claims, but they are all single spark systems.   We decided to
> > not only have multiple 2 to 4 sparks, but to change the concept of how
> > we apply the spark to the cylinder.   We started with a multihead spark
> > plug that fires all electrodes concurrently and not randomly serially.
> Than
> > we went beyond that concept to eliminating the spark plug all together
> with
> > our Ring of Fire Concept.  Instead of localizing the spark to a single
> area
> > of the cylinder we determined that we could redesign the heads and
> > headgaskets to spark.   This would allow even spark distribution
> > conconcurrently around the cylinder.   You can see more and come
> > back as the site is still being completed at
> > [color=#FF6633]www.syncrofire.com[/color].  We
> > are working with the  webmaster now to correct and update the graphic.

> > What are the benefits we perceive.

> > 1).   30% more power in your engine.  Take a 300 HP engine and make a
400
> > HP.
> > 2).   Reduce your fuel consumption by 30%.
> > 3).  Imagine reducing fuel imports by 30%
> > 4).  The applications are anything that has a motor and a spark.  From
> > V8's, Weed Wackers, Model Airplane, Briggs and Strattons, etc etc.

> > If you want to work with us somehow just email us at Syncrofire.

> > Don Wilshe
> > 1st Enviro Safety
> > www.1stenvirosafety.com
> > www.syncrofire.com

Don Wilsh

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Don Wilsh » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:37:38

Honda Jazz... Dual Plug Heads.   Someone else likes mutli concurrent
sparking..

DW

      Honda Jazz, Ideally, the engine of a new-generation compact sedan
should offer optimal fuel efficiency, as well as plentiful energy on demand.
Honda successfully achieved both aims with the new City's intelligent and
innovative 1.5-liter, 4-cylinder i-DSI engine, featuring sophisticated
technology unavailable in ordinary sedans. Conventional engines employ one
spark plug per cylinder. But in the new City, Honda i-DSI uses two
sequentially igniting spark plugs per cylinder and varies ignition timing
according to driving conditions to realize high combustion efficiency. This
raises fuel efficiency dramatically, achieving the world's top-level fuel
economy among 1.5-liter gasoline engine vehicles. It also delivers optimal
torque in the low-to-mid rpm range, to greatly benefit urban performance at
the most commonly driven speeds.

Don Wilsh

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Don Wilsh » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:41:13

Mitch A

I guess you missed the FTC action against Spit Fire.. lol

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of
SPLITFIRE, INC., a corporation.

FILE NO. 952-3029

AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER

The Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of certain acts
and practices of SplitFire, Inc., a corporation ("proposed respondent").
Proposed respondent, having been represented by counsel, is willing to enter
into an agreement containing a consent order resolving the allegations
contained in the attached draft complaint. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between SplitFire, Inc., and counsel for the
Federal Trade Commission that:

1. Proposed respondent SplitFire, Inc. is an Illinois corporation with its
principal office or place of business at 4065 Commercial Avenue, Northbrook,
Illinois, 60062-1851.

2. Proposed respondent admits all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the
draft complaint.

3. Proposed respondent waives:

a. Any further procedural steps;

b. The requirement that the Commission's decision contain a statement of
findings of fact and conclusions of law; and

c. All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest
the validity of the order entered pursuant to this agreement.

4. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of the
proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the Commission. If this
agreement is accepted by the Commission, it, together with the draft
complaint, will be placed on the public record for a period of sixty (60)
days and information about it publicly released. The Commission thereafter
may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify proposed
respondent, in which event it will take such action as it may consider
appropriate, or issue and serve its complaint (in such form as the
circumstances may require) and decision in disposition of the proceeding.

5. This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an
admission by proposed respondent that the law has been violated as alleged
in the draft complaint, or that the facts as alleged in the draft complaint,
other than the jurisdictional facts, are true.

6. This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission,
and if such acceptance is not subsequently withdrawn by the Commission
pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.34 of the Commission's Rules, the
Commission may, without further notice to proposed respondent, (1) issue its
complaint corresponding in form and substance with the attached draft
complaint and its decision containing the following order in disposition of
the proceeding, and (2) make information about it public. When so entered,
the order shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified,
or set aside in the same manner and within the same time provided by statute
for other orders. The order shall become final upon service. Delivery of the
complaint and the decision and order to proposed respondent by any means
specified in Section 4.4 of the Commission's Rules shall constitute service.
Proposed respondent waives any right it may have to any other manner of
service. The complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order. No
agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in
the order or in the agreement may be used to vary or contradict the terms of
the order.

7. Proposed respondent has read the draft complaint and consent order.
Proposed respondent understands it may be liable for civil penalties in the
amount provided by law and other appropriate relief for each violation of
the order after it becomes final.

ORDER

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this order, the following definitions shall apply:

1. "Competent and reliable scientific evidence" shall mean tests, analyses,
research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals
in the relevant area, that have been conducted and evaluated in an objective
manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in
the profession to yield accurate and reliable results.

2. Unless otherwise specified, "Respondent" shall mean SplitFire, Inc., a
corporation, its successors and assigns, and its officers, agents,
representatives and employees. For purposes of this order, "successors"
shall include, but not be limited to:

(a) any person who

(1) markets the SplitFire spark plug, any split-electrode spark plug, or any
spark plug with more than two electrodes; and

(2) holds or has held an ownership interest in and/or serves or has served
as an officer of respondent SplitFire, Inc.; and

(b) any entity that

(1) markets the SplitFire spark plug, any split-electrode spark plug, or any
spark plug with more than two electrodes; and

(2) is owned or controlled, wholly or in part, by any person who holds or
has held an ownership interest in respondent SplitFire, Inc. and/or serves
or has served as an officer of respondent SplitFire, Inc.

3. "In or affecting commerce" shall mean as defined in Section 4 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 44.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation,
subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing,
labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution
of the "SplitFire Spark Plug," or any other motor vehicle product, in or
affecting commerce, shall not make any representation, in any manner,
expressly or by implication, about:

The effect of such product on a vehicle's fuel economy;

The effect of such product on a vehicle's level of emissions;

The effect of such product on a vehicle's horsepower; or

The comparative or absolute cost savings that such product will contribute
to or achieve, unless, at the time it is made, respondent possesses and
relies upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates
the representation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation,
subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing,
labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution
of any motor vehicle product, in or affecting commerce, shall not
misrepresent, in any manner, expressly or by implication, the existence,
contents, validity, results, conclusions or interpretations of any test,
study, or research.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation,
subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing,
labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution
of any motor vehicle product, in or affecting commerce, shall not represent,
in any manner, expressly or by implication, that the experience represented
by any user testimonial or endorsement of the product represents the typical
or ordinary experience of members of the public who use the product, unless:

At the time it is made, respondent possesses and relies upon competent and
reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation; or

Respondent discloses, clearly and prominently, and in close proximity to the
endorsement or testimonial, either:

What the generally expected results would be for users of the product, or

The limited applicability of the endorser's experience to what consumers may
generally expect to achieve, that is, that consumers should not expect to
experience similar results.

For purposes of this Part, "endorsement" shall mean as defined in 16 C.F.R.
255.0(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, directly or through any corporation,
subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing,
labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution
of any motor vehicle product, in or affecting commerce, shall not make any
representation, in any manner, expressly or by implication, about the
benefits, performance, or efficacy of such product, unless, at the time the
representation is made, respondent possesses and relies upon competent and
reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable
scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent SplitFire, Inc. and its successors and
assigns shall, for five (5) years after the last date of dissemination of
any representation covered by this order, maintain and upon request make
available to the Federal Trade Commission for inspection and copying:

A. All advertisements and promotional materials containing the
representation;

B. All materials that were relied upon in disseminating the representation;
and

C. All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence
in their possession or control that contradict, qualify, or call into
question the representation, or the basis relied upon for the
representation, including complaints and other communications with consumers
or with governmental or consumer protection organizations.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent SplitFire, Inc. and its successors and
assigns, shall deliver a copy of this order to all current and future
principals, officers, directors, and managers, and to all current and future
employees, agents, and representatives having responsibilities with respect
to the subject matter of this order, and shall secure from each such person
a signed and dated statement acknowledging receipt of the order. Respondent
shall deliver this order to current personnel within thirty (30) days after
the date of service of this order, and to future personnel within thirty
(30) days after the person assumes such position or responsibilities.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent SplitFire, Inc., and its successors
and assigns, shall notify the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to
any change in the corporation that may affect compliance obligations arising
under this order, including but not limited to a dissolution, assignment,
sale, merger, or other action that would ...

read more »

Tony Rickar

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Tony Rickar » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:27:35


> I guess you missed the FTC action against Spit Fire.. lol

So you must be pretty darned confident to state a 30% increase in power.
Note not "up to 30%" but "30%".

Sorry to sound so sceptical, but understanding the amount of work the car
manufacturers have put into ignition system technology over the years, a
discovery leading to such a huge increase seems somehow unlikely.

Looking at what Mercedes have been doing with the new "Maybach Type 12"
which include twin turbos and twin spark heads, the twin spark bit seems to
be for increasing efficiency and a relative minor gain (the twin turbos do
the major stuff). This is a high investment bit of R&D focusing on power
rather than the economy focus of a Honda Jazz.

Tony Rickar

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Tony Rickar » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:57:47

"Don Wilshe" wrote

I have a multi concurrent sparking car on my drive (my wife's Alfa GTV 2.0
TS). The old 2.0 twinspark has since been replaced by a single plug headed
version creating 15 bhp and a significant torque gain. Alfas have used twin
sparking engines for over a decade.

Intereresting that Hondas revolutionay twin spark produces less power per
litre than Alfas ten year old one, that is marketing for you...

Of course you don't get Alfas over there as they haven't been put the
stringent US crash tests, whilst we get your Chrysler Voyagers which sit at
the bottom of euro crash tests as they aren't classified as cars in the
US...

Also the Jazz specs are outperformed in all respects including economy with
the latest generation multijet diesels, where the big gains are being made
currently.

Tony Rickar

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Tony Rickar » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:59:56


> The old 2.0 twinspark has since been replaced by a single plug headed
> version creating 15 bhp

15 bhp more :)
Dav

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Dav » Mon, 02 Aug 2004 05:58:09

Snake oil.

Don Wilsh

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Don Wilsh » Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:17:54

Small minds..    We should still be on horseback i guess..

DW


John Smit

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by John Smit » Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:39:08

Most of the gains with the twin spark plugs were better idle and
emissions... Many car mfg's have tried this..
Don Wilsh

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Don Wilsh » Sun, 08 Aug 2004 01:54:56

I read where Ducati sells a twin spark head and claims 10 hp.  I see that
honda has just released a twin sparkplug head car called the JAZZ.  Top fuel
cars run Twin Spark Plug heads is that for performance or reliability..

DW


Goy Larse

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Goy Larse » Sun, 08 Aug 2004 02:49:49


> "Don Wilshe" wrote

> > Honda Jazz... Dual Plug Heads.   Someone else likes mutli concurrent
> > sparking..

> I have a multi concurrent sparking car on my drive (my wife's Alfa GTV 2.0
> TS). The old 2.0 twinspark has since been replaced by a single plug headed
> version creating 15 bhp and a significant torque gain. Alfas have used twin
> sparking engines for over a decade.

Alfa used TS heads in the 60/70's too, in the GTA touring car, now
there's a mod waiting to happen, 60/70's touring cars

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Bruce Kennewel

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Bruce Kennewel » Mon, 09 Aug 2004 06:34:48

Yeah.
Here's an idea, Uncle: How about a 60's/70's TransAm mod? :)

Bruce.


Goy Larse

OT: 21st Century "Enviromental Sparking Technolgy"

by Goy Larse » Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:50:47


> Yeah.
> Here's an idea, Uncle: How about a 60's/70's TransAm mod? :)

I think it's an excellent idea...along with mods for every time period
of AussieV8's and their predecessors :D

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.