rec.autos.simulators

GP3 pessimism?

ymenar

GP3 pessimism?

by ymenar » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00


And where do you assume Im talking about Grand Prix Legends, which FYI has a
good online support now (easily in the 5best on the market), even in the
original version.  But GP3 will have NONE of that.  Nadda, zip, niet, non.
I was more talking about Nascar Racing 3, Hawaii and the Nascar Racing
Online Series back in the days.  They have not been matched yet in terms of
online community tools which is much more than simply TCP/IP.

What is your opinion about the lack of Force Feedback also?  Will you pay
for an offline hoplap racing simulation, even if a good one?

Oh your right about that.  So there is Ratbag (even if I consider the
prediction code "good" like GPL, not excellent like the one on the NROS or
N3), Microsoft (C:PR had great online racing, and their arcade series of
software has excellent online racing) and Papyrus.  You see the pattern here
David? We have now Geoff with his elitist attitude who won't have any online
racing.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

Matthew B.Knutse

GP3 pessimism?

by Matthew B.Knutse » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

David G Fisher skrev i meldingen

>You could insert the name of any title in the thread header and ask "Why
the
>pessimism?

>It's just how things are here.

>David G Fisher



>> Hi all,

>> For some reason I don't quite understand where some of the pessimistic
>> remarks on GP3 come from.

David G Fishe

GP3 pessimism?

by David G Fishe » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00



> > GPL was a royal pain in the a** online

> And where do you assume Im talking about Grand Prix Legends, which FYI has
a
> good online support now (easily in the 5best on the market), even in the
> original version.

Jan referred to GPL and since you replied to his post in agreement, I
carried it through.

You are right about N3/N2. Having good perfromance with a large field of
cars in an online race is pretty impressive. Why not the same with GPL?
Maybe because Kraemmer was just as hard-headed as Crammond is being accused
of?

Actually, I really think the reason there is no TCP/IP racing with GP3 is
because they couldn't/wouldn't pay the price. The reason given to the public
is just a cover.

I think GP3 is going to be THE sim I've always wanted. Modern F1, great
physics, graphics, sound, etc., and I'll buy it the day it's released.  If
so, I'm going to be even more disappointed that it doesn't have online
racing than I would if it was just an ok sim. I'd like my practice time in a
sim to amount to something, and in my mind, only online racing does that.
Hotlapping bores me, and racing the AI just isn't the same as real people.

No sim yet has had everything I've wanted, but GP3 wil probably come
closest.

F1 2000 may save the day though.  :-)

David G Fisher

Bern

GP3 pessimism?

by Bern » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Thank god im not the only one with a brain in this forum. Only a moron would
post negatively about a game that hasnt been release and has a track record
and history as deep as papyrus. And then to compare it to an upcoming EA
sports game? What are you people on?



> Hi all,

> For some reason I don't quite understand where some of the pessimistic
> remarks on GP3 come from. I hear people complaining about how GP3 'looks
> more like GP2.5', 'has unimpressive graphics', 'is missing the boat
> because of lack of Force Feedback or lack of Internet-support', 'won't
> ever come near to the driving model of GPL', etc.

> I would like to argue that I never expected GP3 not to look like GP2.
> What should Crammond have done, throw his work on GP2 out of the window?
> It is by far not easy to create such an immense simulation. If Crammond
> has managed to lift GP2 up to a much higher level with improved
> graphics, improved AI, an improved driving model and an improved weather
> model, all by his own in less than four years, then we should be glad to
> be able to play this game in July.

> (I may be going out on a limb here, but I would like to point out that I
> think GP3's graphics for instance are better than those seen in F1 2000
> (based on the screenshots and movies of both simulations I saw on the
> Internet). As SCREAMIN pointed out in the GP3 forum, the graphics are
> more crisp. I would like to add that the F1 2000 shots look too glossy.
> The first time I saw the 38 Mb Gamestar GP3 video full screen on my 17"
> monitor my jaw dropped to the floor. When I saw the F1 2000 video I
> thought "so these are the superior graphics? Where's the background in
> Monaco for instance?")

> Of course, I would really love to race online. I would be thrilled to
> see an animated pit crew. It would add to the realism if I could drive a
> formation lap, or a victory lap into parc ferm. I would feel like I
> competed with the great if the cars looked like those in the 2000
> season.

> It is not to be in GP3. But I won't complain, because I am confident
> that Crammond has real heart for making simulations that stay, that keep
> me on the edge of my seat and that satisfy my hunger for speed,
> competition and accuracy of simulation. I may be too sentimental about
> this, call me a Crammond-fan, but then again, he hasn't disappointed me
> or screwed up in a big way ever.

> An eagerly waiting F1-fan.

> (This message can also be found on the GP3 forum at
> http://www.simracingnews.com )
> --


David Er

GP3 pessimism?

by David Er » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00



And here I thought it was caused by that *gigiantic * chip on your shoulder.
Perhaps a touch of bursitis from all the trolling you do? Simple remedy for
all those problems but I think you're enjoying yourself too much to take it.

Doctor David

Ace

GP3 pessimism?

by Ace » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

On the Contrary, GPL sits merrily atop the waves, bobbing along, ready to
depth charge the already sinkning carcasses of all inferior sims...

<snipped>

Jan Verschuere

GP3 pessimism?

by Jan Verschuere » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Ehmmm... it's not by Papyrus.

Personally, I think it's more testament of a simple disposition to assume
that "if it's by such_and_such, it'll be ok."

Wake up man.

Jan.
----

> Thank god im not the only one with a brain in this forum. Only a moron
would
> post negatively about a game that hasnt been release and has a track
record
> and history as deep as papyrus. And then to compare it to an upcoming EA
> sports game? What are you people on?



> > Hi all,

> > <Snip>

Ace

GP3 pessimism?

by Ace » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00


>Thank god im not the only one with a brain in this forum.

Careful...

Oh yes, the GP series stretches back over so many titles. When it takes this
many years to develop a "new" game, we, as the buyers, have a right to
expect improvements to be implemented. If they're not going to make
improvements, despite the fact the technology is available, naturally, some
will be upset

Now *you're* starting on EA sports, and about a game that's not been
released, where's that brain, in a jar?

Remco Moe

GP3 pessimism?

by Remco Moe » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00


I also think it's a cover, but for a different reason. _IF_ GP3 still
has the same core engine as GP2, regarding the timing, it is hard to
synchronize multiple clients over the Internet. (Think slomo) That
said, and reading the feature list, I wonder how they will support 16
LAN drivers....

I agree with you.

GP3 will be a great game, I'm sure. But I know I'll be bored with it
after a few weeks, and will return to GPL just to drive humans and
test the flight model of the Eagle at Curva Grande <g>. Of course, if
the rumors about an anual upgrade for GP3 are true, we can expect
thing like FF and online play soon. (note: soon for a GPx title)

Everytime I see something about F1 2000 I'm a bit dissapointed. Not
that it's bad, but it's a bit pale compared to the hype (by you, for
example) created. I remember the same regarding SCGT and RC2000.....
Of course, like always in cases like this, I love to be wrong...

Remco

ymenar

GP3 pessimism?

by ymenar » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00


Okie.  Don't forget SODA Off-Road, who had good multiplayer racing actually
I say.

I guess it goes back to having cars with high sideway momemtum (GPL cars)
and having a much more complex packet setting.  You need more bandwith/car
in GPL compared to any other Papyrus racing simulator.  Formula 1 cars have
a high front/rear momemtum, and that's much more easy to recreate in a
prediction code.

I personally think it's a cover for the actual reason of not being able to.
But I would rather see them put a very basic TCP/IP code then patching it
(like the current GPL online racing, or even the Nascar Racing 3 racing).

Your right.  Unfortunately I do not want to race any AI anymore, and for me
offline racing is not what Im searching for.  Even if it's the best friggin
physics, sound, graphics, it will dissapoint me.  I also feel that GP3 is
THE sim I've always wanted.

I have my doubts.  I would say in that case "I have a bad feeling about
this"  ;-)

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

David G Fishe

GP3 pessimism?

by David G Fishe » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

You're right Dave.

I'm a troll, and I live under a bridge.

David G fisher




> > I just got back from the doctor.

> > Square peg.

> > Round hole.

> > Cause of pain.  :-P

> > David G Fisher

> And here I thought it was caused by that *gigiantic * chip on your
shoulder.
> Perhaps a touch of bursitis from all the trolling you do? Simple remedy
for
> all those problems but I think you're enjoying yourself too much to take
it.

> Doctor David

David G Fishe

GP3 pessimism?

by David G Fishe » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00


If you can find one post by me where I hype F1 2000, I'd love to see it.

RC 2000 lived up to the hype. Ask anyone.............outside r.a.s.
(offisial headquarters of the GPL fan club).

David G Fisher

David Kar

GP3 pessimism?

by David Kar » Thu, 16 Mar 2000 04:00:00

That's not even a consensus on the RC board at High Gear!

-DK


Gamara goodbye, and screeched in message

[snip]

David G Fishe

GP3 pessimism?

by David G Fishe » Fri, 17 Mar 2000 04:00:00

In a recent poll, the readers of High Gear voted RC the sim of the year over
SCGT, DTR, GP500, and N3

It wasn't even close.

But you're right......as usual.

Actually, nobody at HG ever even bothers to talk about RC because it's so
bad. Take a look at the numbers.

http://forums.simracingnews.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro&Byp...
ie=true

David G Fisher


> That's not even a consensus on the RC board at High Gear!

> -DK


> Gamara goodbye, and screeched in message

> [snip]

> > RC 2000 lived up to the hype. Ask anyone.............outside r.a.s.
> > (offisial headquarters of the GPL fan club).

> > David G Fisher

Remco Moe

GP3 pessimism?

by Remco Moe » Fri, 17 Mar 2000 04:00:00




>> Everytime I see something about F1 2000 I'm a bit dissapointed. Not
>> that it's bad, but it's a bit pale compared to the hype (by you, for
>> example) created.

>If you can find one post by me where I hype F1 2000, I'd love to see it.

IMO this is hype...

<START EARLIER POST>

Subject: Re: Request a snapshot of openwheel sims
Date: 03/01/2000

F12000 is due to be released at the end of the month, and GP3 this
summer. Forget the rest.

David G Fisher


<END EARLIER POST>

You once said that RC2000 would be a better simulation then GPL.
Do you still believe that? I don't think that RC2000 is a good
simulation. As a matter of fact, beside the beautifull graphics, it is
quite mediocre...

Remco


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.