C. Bybee
I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
--
Olav K. Malmin
remove spam when replying
Martyn_D
> > Many thanks to Dave for this new track, but I have a
> > question, my frame rates on the "non-original" GPL tracks
> > are slower than on the original tracks. Is this a normal
> > phenomenon? I currently have only tried the "demo"
> > conversions of N3 tracks and Imola and noticed this
> > right away. Just curious...
> A theory is that the amount of polygons in not optimized in the
> self-made tracks, since optimizing is very time-consuming.
> I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove spam when replying
--
-----------------------------------
Morgan Vincent Wooten
http://members.tripod.com/~morganv/
-----------------------------------
> > Many thanks to Dave for this new track, but I have a
> > question, my frame rates on the "non-original" GPL tracks
> > are slower than on the original tracks. Is this a normal
> > phenomenon? I currently have only tried the "demo"
> > conversions of N3 tracks and Imola and noticed this
> > right away. Just curious...
> A theory is that the amount of polygons in not optimized in the
> self-made tracks, since optimizing is very time-consuming.
> I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove spam when replying
Yeah, I tried a full field race at Imola, and it was impossible. But
that's really not a issue for me, since I never race offline :)
> > > Many thanks to Dave for this new track, but I have a
> > > question, my frame rates on the "non-original" GPL tracks
> > > are slower than on the original tracks. Is this a normal
> > > phenomenon? I currently have only tried the "demo"
> > > conversions of N3 tracks and Imola and noticed this
> > > right away. Just curious...
> > A theory is that the amount of polygons in not optimized in the
> > self-made tracks, since optimizing is very time-consuming.
> > I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
> > --
> > Olav K. Malmin
> > remove spam when replying
Ruud van Gaal
MarketGraph / MachTech: http://www.marketgraph.nl
Art: http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery
With out grabbing a new Video card, I wonder if editing the graphics
would help any? Such as taking the trees and making them all one color,
sort of like a green shadow of a tree rather then a multi green color making
a tree look like a tree? or even some of the other graphics... Just what
did the GPLEA do to Snetterton to have a large, medium, small, graphics
files? I couldn't run the large without a 10 fps run. The "small" file I
get 36 all the time with *almost* all graphics turned on.
>C. Bybee
I run a full (19 AI) field at Imola, 800 x 600 rez, mirrors are set to show
'cars and track' and all other (forward view) graphics are at maximum.
No problems at all.....mostly 36 fps, some slowdown at the start (naturally)
and at the first LH corner, where the rate drops to about 27 fps.
(Voodoo 3, P-II 450.)
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> > I prefer optimized tracks myself. Fewer, higher-quality tracks. Racing
with a
> > full or even half a field at the O-ring or Brands Hatch or Snetterton is
> > impossible. Framerate's fine at all the original tracks though. The old
CART
> > tracks seem to be good performers as well. :)
> Yeah, I tried a full field race at Imola, and it was impossible. But
> that's really not a issue for me, since I never race offline :)
> > --
> > -----------------------------------
> > Morgan Vincent Wooten
> > http://members.tripod.com/~morganv/
> > -----------------------------------
> > > > Many thanks to Dave for this new track, but I have a
> > > > question, my frame rates on the "non-original" GPL tracks
> > > > are slower than on the original tracks. Is this a normal
> > > > phenomenon? I currently have only tried the "demo"
> > > > conversions of N3 tracks and Imola and noticed this
> > > > right away. Just curious...
> > > A theory is that the amount of polygons in not optimized in the
> > > self-made tracks, since optimizing is very time-consuming.
> > > I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
> > > --
> > > Olav K. Malmin
> > > remove spam when replying
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove spam when replying
--
-----------------------------------
Morgan Vincent Wooten
http://members.tripod.com/~morganv/
-----------------------------------
> > I prefer optimized tracks myself. Fewer, higher-quality tracks. Racing with
a
> > full or even half a field at the O-ring or Brands Hatch or Snetterton is
> > impossible. Framerate's fine at all the original tracks though. The old
CART
> > tracks seem to be good performers as well. :)
> Yeah, I tried a full field race at Imola, and it was impossible. But
> that's really not a issue for me, since I never race offline :)
> > --
> > -----------------------------------
> > Morgan Vincent Wooten
> > http://members.tripod.com/~morganv/
> > -----------------------------------
> > > > Many thanks to Dave for this new track, but I have a
> > > > question, my frame rates on the "non-original" GPL tracks
> > > > are slower than on the original tracks. Is this a normal
> > > > phenomenon? I currently have only tried the "demo"
> > > > conversions of N3 tracks and Imola and noticed this
> > > > right away. Just curious...
> > > A theory is that the amount of polygons in not optimized in the
> > > self-made tracks, since optimizing is very time-consuming.
> > > I rather like a lot of tracks, instead of very few optimized ones :)
> > > --
> > > Olav K. Malmin
> > > remove spam when replying
> --
> Olav K. Malmin
> remove spam when replying
