the Indy 500?
Thanks,
J. P. Hovercraft
Thanks,
J. P. Hovercraft
-----------
"My dispute is with the IRL. I will not support the IRL because I think that's
what has disrupted open-wheel racing in America for us. I mean, we are pulling
in different directions and that doesn't make sense."
-- Mario Andretti, May 2000
Juan Montoya tells the truth about the Indianapolis Motor Speedway
http://espn.go.com/media/2000/q2/car_000517jm1a.wav
Oval racing is 98% engineering and 2% driver talent.
Al Unser Jr: The Indy Retirement League Poster-Boy
http://www.speedcenter.com/gallery/gallery98/13midohio/need_an_ashtra...
1968 I think (?).
--
Cheers!
Graeme Nash
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
>>Does anyone know what year was the last year that turbine cars ran in
>>the Indy 500?
>The STP Turbines were 67, with Parnelli Jones and 68 with Art Pollard,
>Joe Leonard and Graham Hill. Following that season, they reduced the
>inlet area by about 25% which made the cars uncompetitive, which is
>exactly what USAC wanted... I believe at least one turbine car was
>entered for 69 but it was way off the pace and didn't attempt
>qualification.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> >On Sat, 27 May 2000 17:59:48 GMT, "J. P. Hovercraft"
> >>Does anyone know what year was the last year that turbine cars ran in
> >>the Indy 500?
> >The STP Turbines were 67, with Parnelli Jones and 68 with Art Pollard,
> >Joe Leonard and Graham Hill. Following that season, they reduced the
> >inlet area by about 25% which made the cars uncompetitive, which is
> >exactly what USAC wanted... I believe at least one turbine car was
> >entered for 69 but it was way off the pace and didn't attempt
> >qualification.
> and if memory serves the driver/entrant of the '69 attempt, was non
> other than Bruce McLaren!
I meant, of course, "Offenhauser".
My apologies to Mr. & Mrs. Offenhauser and al the little Offenhausers.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> --
> Regards,
> Bruce Kennewell,
> Canberra, Australia.
> ---------------------------
> > On Sat, 27 May 2000 20:42:50 -0500, The Black Cat =^..^=
> > >On Sat, 27 May 2000 17:59:48 GMT, "J. P. Hovercraft"
> > >>Does anyone know what year was the last year that turbine cars ran in
> > >>the Indy 500?
> > >The STP Turbines were 67, with Parnelli Jones and 68 with Art Pollard,
> > >Joe Leonard and Graham Hill. Following that season, they reduced the
> > >inlet area by about 25% which made the cars uncompetitive, which is
> > >exactly what USAC wanted... I believe at least one turbine car was
> > >entered for 69 but it was way off the pace and didn't attempt
> > >qualification.
> > and if memory serves the driver/entrant of the '69 attempt, was non
> > other than Bruce McLaren!
On Sun, 28 May 2000 20:55:56 +1000, "Bruce Kennewell"
>> and if memory serves the driver/entrant of the '69 attempt, was non
>> other than Bruce McLaren!
>and if memory serves the driver/entrant of the '69 attempt, was non
>other than Bruce McLaren!
I don't remember that Bruce McLaren drove it, but that could be faulty
memory on my part.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> On Sun, 28 May 2000 20:55:56 +1000, "Bruce Kennewell"
> >No, there were no turbine-engined cars after the 1968 race.
> >In 1969 all but three of the engines used were turbocharged (either Ford
or
> >Effenhauser units),
> >The exceptions were Dan Gurney's Weslake and the two Repco-powered
Brabhams.
> >> and if memory serves the driver/entrant of the '69 attempt, was non
> >> other than Bruce McLaren!
I may be off on this but it sounds like Carroll Shelbys Turbine car. Deny
Hulme actually did some testing, but the car was not up to speed
supposedly, and was never entered.
Dave