rec.autos.simulators

Physics Help

Jonny Hodgso

Physics Help

by Jonny Hodgso » Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:38:13


> I re-checked everything.  It all looks correct.  The radius
> isn't much more than 60'.  Speed is close to 40 mph.  There
> is slight banking to the track, but not much.

> I'll have to think about it some more.  Is there some part
> of this equation that is being left out?

How much banking?  It might just be enough...

Let's say Q (read theta) is the bank angle, v is speed, M is total
mass, r is radius, g is gravity and mu is friction.

Resolving forces relative to the track surface, I get

M (v^2/r cos Q - g sin Q) needed down the slope, and
M (g cos Q + v^2/r sin Q) download on the tyres

Check at Q = 0 => sin Q = 0, cos Q = 1 leaving

Mv^2/r across and Mg into the ground.  Sound good.

So adding tyre friction, to corner at the limit we have

mu M (g cos Q + v^2/r sin Q) = M (v^2/r cos Q - g sin Q)

Since I can now see a trig identity coming on, and I don't like
those ;-), cheating and using Excel gives me a bank angle a little
under 19 degrees for mu = 0.9 and the data you've already given.
Less, obviously, if the tyres are stickier than 0.9.

See if that sounds plausible!

Jonny

Paul Laidla

Physics Help

by Paul Laidla » Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:54:31

Hi


Ah ha! yes, that would explain all!

Have fun!

    Paul

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 02/01/02

Pat Dotso

Physics Help

by Pat Dotso » Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:33:38

OK, here are the results of intensive work :)

First, I spent an afternoon measuring the race track.  The actual radius
of the turns is 95 feet, so the lateral G's are a little more than 1 G.
There is 2-4 degree banking on the track.

Second, what I really wanted to know is, how much left side static
weight bias do I need so that during cornering the weight transfer evens
out to a 50/50 split between the right side and left side of the kart.

Jonny Hodgson came to the rescue with the following
equation:

x = h (v^2/r cos Q - g sin Q)
      -----------------------
      (v^2/r sin Q + g cos Q)

Where x is the offset distance of the static CG from the center of the
kart, given,

h=VCG
v=velocity
r=turn radius
Q=track banking
g=gravity

Then the percentage of weight on the inside is just:

        100* (x + 0.5t) / t

The results are that close to an 80% left side weight bias is needed to
balance the weight transfer between the right and left side of the kart.

So I'd like to see if there are any comments on the validity of these
calculations.  Not necessarily whether or not a LTO kart will work with
80% LS weight (though thoughts on that are welcome), but is the formula
correct for predicting the weight transfer?

Thanks,
Pat Dotson


> A racing kart goes around a 60 ft radius turn at 40 mph.  What
> is the lateral acceleration of the kart in G's?

> I should be able to solve this in my sleep, but too much time
> has passed since graduation :)  Don't make me dig out the
> text books, please!

> --
> Pat Dotson

J. Todd Wass

Physics Help

by J. Todd Wass » Fri, 01 Feb 2002 15:28:13

  Pat,

  That formula looks familiar, although I haven't used it (writing it down now
:0)).  If it came from Jonny Hodgson, I'd trust that it's right.  How did you
find the center of gravity height with yourself on the cart?  

>OK, here are the results of intensive work :)

>First, I spent an afternoon measuring the race track.  The actual radius
>of the turns is 95 feet, so the lateral G's are a little more than 1 G.
>There is 2-4 degree banking on the track.

>Second, what I really wanted to know is, how much left side static
>weight bias do I need so that during cornering the weight transfer evens
>out to a 50/50 split between the right side and left side of the kart.

>Jonny Hodgson came to the rescue with the following
>equation:

>x = h (v^2/r cos Q - g sin Q)
>      -----------------------
>      (v^2/r sin Q + g cos Q)

>Where x is the offset distance of the static CG from the center of the
>kart, given,

>h=VCG
>v=velocity
>r=turn radius
>Q=track banking
>g=gravity

>Then the percentage of weight on the inside is just:

>        100* (x + 0.5t) / t

>The results are that close to an 80% left side weight bias is needed to
>balance the weight transfer between the right and left side of the kart.

>So I'd like to see if there are any comments on the validity of these
>calculations.  Not necessarily whether or not a LTO kart will work with
>80% LS weight (though thoughts on that are welcome), but is the formula
>correct for predicting the weight transfer?

>Thanks,
>Pat Dotson


>> A racing kart goes around a 60 ft radius turn at 40 mph.  What
>> is the lateral acceleration of the kart in G's?

>> I should be able to solve this in my sleep, but too much time
>> has passed since graduation :)  Don't make me dig out the
>> text books, please!

>> --
>> Pat Dotson

Todd Wasson
---
Performance Simulations
Drag Racing and Top Speed Prediction
Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.Com

My little car sim screenshots:
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Pat Dotso

Physics Help

by Pat Dotso » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 00:46:07

Todd,

There are kart setup programs that include a worksheet to
calculate VCG.  The typical range for VCG is 11" to 14".

What you do is first scale the kart to measure the weight
at each wheel.  Then tip the back end of the kart up and
record the new front wheel weights.  The programs will
calculate VCGb based on the transferred weight, kart
wheelbase, and the distance the rear tires are raised.

What is intersting is that oval track racing kart setups
never use much more than 60% left side bias - usually
more like 56%-58%.  Yet, to balance the weight transfer
between left and right, you need more than 70% left bias.
I think I can gain an advantage by running higher left
side bias which will work the left tires more.  Whether
or not the kart will work right or handle well remains
to be seen, since they are designed for less left bias.
--
Pat Dotson


>   That formula looks familiar, although I haven't used it (writing it down now
> :0)).  If it came from Jonny Hodgson, I'd trust that it's right.  How did you
> find the center of gravity height with yourself on the cart?

> >Second, what I really wanted to know is, how much left side static
> >weight bias do I need so that during cornering the weight transfer evens
> >out to a 50/50 split between the right side and left side of the kart.

> >Jonny Hodgson came to the rescue with the following
> >equation:

> >x = h (v^2/r cos Q - g sin Q)
> >      -----------------------
> >      (v^2/r sin Q + g cos Q)

> >Where x is the offset distance of the static CG from the center of the
> >kart, given,

> >h=VCG
> >v=velocity
> >r=turn radius
> >Q=track banking
> >g=gravity

> >Then the percentage of weight on the inside is just:

> >        100* (x + 0.5t) / t

J. Todd Wass

Physics Help

by J. Todd Wass » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 01:44:50

  Interesting.  That VCG is with the driver, correct?  Do you sit on the kart
when the rear is tipped up, or just estimate the driver's effect afterwards?
I've seen this approach before in books, but haven't tried it.  Just curious,
what's the most popular software for this kind of thing in carting?  

 That's odd that they don't usually run more than 60% left side bias, I wonder
why that is.  Maybe it's not practical for some reason, although I can't
imagine why it wouldn't be..  It seems like you're on the right track there
anyway (no pun intended) :-P.  

Todd Wasson
---
Performance Simulations
Drag Racing and Top Speed Prediction
Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.Com

My little car sim screenshots:
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Pat Dotso

Physics Help

by Pat Dotso » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 04:44:57

Try:

http://www.nacoma.cc/kartsmart.htm

Yes, that's with the driver.  You only have to tip the kart
up as little as 6", though the higher it is the more accurate
the result should be.
--
PD


>   Interesting.  That VCG is with the driver, correct?  Do you sit on the kart
> when the rear is tipped up, or just estimate the driver's effect afterwards?
> I've seen this approach before in books, but haven't tried it.  Just curious,
> what's the most popular software for this kind of thing in carting?

Jonny Hodgso

Physics Help

by Jonny Hodgso » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 03:30:10


Don't do that!  I was famous at uni for my silly mistakes and
factors-of-2... :-)

Jonny

J. Todd Wass

Physics Help

by J. Todd Wass » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 09:26:45

  Hehe :-)  Alllllllll-righty then!  

Todd Wasson
---
Performance Simulations
Drag Racing and Top Speed Prediction
Software
http://PerformanceSimulations.Com

My little car sim screenshots:
http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm

Doug Millike

Physics Help

by Doug Millike » Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:33:45

For CG height calcs--these are usually very sensitive to any small
inaccuracy with the scales.  The few times I've done it, I've taken weights
at a number of different heights, plotted the results, then fit a good
line through the scatter in the data points.

I've heard from a friend that the short track cars ("super modifieds"?)
that used to run at the Oswego, NY paved oval had up to 80% left weight.
There must have been one guy that figured out (by trial and error, and by
being clever) what it took to get the car to drive reasonably with that
much offset...  and then I suppose every one else copied him.  The big
block V-8 engines were set between the F and R wheels on the left side of
the car, drive shaft passed just inside the left rear wheel, rear axle had
an offset pumpkin, driver sat next to the driveshaft.  These cars were
banned some years ago (I'm not clear on the full history).  They were very
fast.  Also very easy to roll over if you spun 180 deg...or maybe even if
you had to turn right (up the banking) to miss something in front of you??

It will be interesting to hear how this works out for you.

-- Doug Milliken


> Try:

> http://www.nacoma.cc/kartsmart.htm

> Yes, that's with the driver.  You only have to tip the kart
> up as little as 6", though the higher it is the more accurate
> the result should be.
> --
> PD


> >   Interesting.  That VCG is with the driver, correct?  Do you sit on the kart
> > when the rear is tipped up, or just estimate the driver's effect afterwards?
> > I've seen this approach before in books, but haven't tried it.  Just curious,
> > what's the most popular software for this kind of thing in carting?

Pat Dotso

Physics Help

by Pat Dotso » Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:15:16


> I've heard from a friend that the short track cars ("super modifieds"?)
> that used to run at the Oswego, NY paved oval had up to 80% left weight.

I've been getting more and more pumped up that I'm on to
something here.  This news is icing on the cake!  Thanks
Doug.

That's scary.  I wasn't actually going to start out at 80%,
more like 70% or so.  The key is how low I can get my VCG.
The lower it is the less left I have to run.

I'll probably just end up scuffing my shiny Simpson
Super Shark! :)

Kart people are very skeptical about high left side
weight.  Everyone has a stock answer - too much left
bias will cause a four wheel drift.  With normal
setups, cornering at 1 G, 75% of the total weight of
the kart is on the right side tires.  If you suddenly
go to 50% of the total weight on the RS, but still
have the same tire setup, of course all the grip is
gone.    My answer to that is use softer tires and
less air pressure until they start gripping.

--
PD

Ruud van Ga

Physics Help

by Ruud van Ga » Fri, 08 Feb 2002 05:14:08

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:30:10 -0000, "Jonny Hodgson"



>>   Pat,

>>   That formula looks familiar, although I haven't used it (writing it down now
>> :0)).  If it came from Jonny Hodgson, I'd trust that it's right.  How did you

>Don't do that!  I was famous at uni for my silly mistakes and
>factors-of-2... :-)

Hehe, whatever happened to just off-by-1? ;-)

Ruud van Gaal
Free car sim: http://www.racer.nl/
Pencil art  : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/

Jonny Hodgso

Physics Help

by Jonny Hodgso » Fri, 08 Feb 2002 05:19:39


<g> I was fine with the off-by-ones; my answers almost always came
to a factor of 2, whenever they were wrong!  I think it's actually
something to do with my inability to operate a calculator...

Jonny


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.