rec.autos.simulators

new n2003 demo out

Steve Blankenshi

new n2003 demo out

by Steve Blankenshi » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 04:55:05

Nope; the main sign that it was bottoming was the sound; only noticed the
sparks in the replay.  In fact, during the same Michigan session, I got a
solid nudge from one of the AI on my inside quarter panel and got sideways.
But the tires slid, scrubbed and then grabbed, and I saved it.  The AI car
backed out of it to avoid a crash, the others behind likewise and we all got
back to racing.  Nice job!


> Does the bottom out invoke a guaranteed-spin like it does in NR2002 and N4
?

> This is one thing that NT2003 handled a LOT more realistically than
> NR2002/N4 did.

> Larry







> > > > I think the bumps at Michigan are more severe.

> > > > Achim

> > > I'm not sure if severe is the right word. I would say they are more
> > > noticeable, but they don't seem to have as much negative effect (read
as
> > > spinning out lol) as they did before.  I'm not 100% but I'm thinking
the
> > > Jasper setup bottoms out now in turn one, at least It sounds that way.

> > > MadDAWG

> > Yes it does, and it trails sparks like an early 90's F1 car in the
> > process... ;-)

> > SB

Larr

new n2003 demo out

by Larr » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 06:19:42

Kewl!!!

And I never use that damed word :)

Larry


> Nope; the main sign that it was bottoming was the sound; only noticed the
> sparks in the replay.  In fact, during the same Michigan session, I got a
> solid nudge from one of the AI on my inside quarter panel and got
sideways.
> But the tires slid, scrubbed and then grabbed, and I saved it.  The AI car
> backed out of it to avoid a crash, the others behind likewise and we all
got
> back to racing.  Nice job!



> > Does the bottom out invoke a guaranteed-spin like it does in NR2002 and
N4
> ?

> > This is one thing that NT2003 handled a LOT more realistically than
> > NR2002/N4 did.

> > Larry


message





> > > > > I think the bumps at Michigan are more severe.

> > > > > Achim

> > > > I'm not sure if severe is the right word. I would say they are more
> > > > noticeable, but they don't seem to have as much negative effect
(read
> as
> > > > spinning out lol) as they did before.  I'm not 100% but I'm thinking
> the
> > > > Jasper setup bottoms out now in turn one, at least It sounds that
way.

> > > > MadDAWG

> > > Yes it does, and it trails sparks like an early 90's F1 car in the
> > > process... ;-)

> > > SB

Carl Ribbegaard

new n2003 demo out

by Carl Ribbegaard » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:54:45

The media beta Zipfile is 153 431 KB and the official demo setup is 122 011
KB. At least here.
The installed folders seem to be equal size. (well the media beta is
slightly larger after my attempts to replayce michigan with mosport, and
adding cars to the field ;-)
The Exe is sligthly larger in the new one.

:-)


> It's also a LOT bigger isn't it?

> Larry



> > It's different.
> > See for your self with windiff. ;-)



> > > theres a link on bluesnews.com ...... lets see if its so much
different
> > than
> > > the one from before

Dave Henri

new n2003 demo out

by Dave Henri » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:02:16



> Considering it's their farewell release to Nascar and perhaps to many
> of their fans (as nobody knows where Papy is heading), and in the
> light of the fact that the past 3 years have shown that there is a
> substantial interest in using the Nx sims for RC's, it would have been
> a friendly gesture towards their fans to include an RC into the demo,
> to give the RC fans a chance to enjoy and assess the new physics as
> well while waiting for their copy of the full version which no doubt
> they all have ordered already anyway ;)

> Achim



>> After racing the first demo I was actually pretty happy that dega now
>> required a little skill to drive.  So much for that ;)

   Has anyone tried just dropping the N2k2 version of St Jovite(or other
roadcourse) into the demo to see if it ran??
dave henrie
Joachim Trens

new n2003 demo out

by Joachim Trens » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:35:46

Seems to be a no-go.

Achim


...

Joachim Trens

new n2003 demo out

by Joachim Trens » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:19:48

I used to fly RC Helicopters for a few years. That was good fun :)

Achim


Don Burnett

new n2003 demo out

by Don Burnett » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:16:24

I did the rc plane thing for about 10 years myself, the last 4 years of
which I flew cometition pattern.
Even fly in the AMA Nationals one year.

Been a long time since I flew RC,  guess about 11 years now.

Don Burnette


> I used to fly RC Helicopters for a few years. That was good fun :)

> Achim



>> Fortunately for me Joachim Im on my way out the door for a road trip
>> to my nearest EB.  I used to do the RC thing but my eyes aren't good
>> nuff anymore (too many planes just flew away) and the RC radio
>> causes an incessant buzzing in my ears :)  Oh you meant Road Course
>> not Remote Control hehe.

Larr

new n2003 demo out

by Larr » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 22:58:01

Me too.  And it's the primary reason I developed NO savings through the
latter half of the 1980's :)

I had the first Schoonard Xccel in San Diego.  Brought it over when I was on
Leave on the East Coast.  All we did was stare at it for weeks, and I was
afraid to fly it it was so pretty :)

And yes, I started with the Shuttle (well, 4 or 5 of them, actually :)) like
eveyone else did :)

Larry


> I used to fly RC Helicopters for a few years. That was good fun :)

> Achim



> > Fortunately for me Joachim Im on my way out the door for a road trip to
my
> > nearest EB.  I used to do the RC thing but my eyes aren't good nuff
> anymore
> > (too many planes just flew away) and the RC radio causes an incessant
> > buzzing in my ears :)  Oh you meant Road Course not Remote Control hehe.

Larr

new n2003 demo out

by Larr » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:03:00

Anyone ever do 1/4 Scale Cup cars?

I did that in San Diego.  Ran in the first ever ROAR 1/4 scale nationals and
if I remember right came out 3rd in the main feature.

It was a nice track.  It used to be an old midget track for kids.  Even had
nice banking!

The spectator crowds were so big that we were not allowed to race on
Saturday's because the track owner was afraid we would take ticket sales
away from the full-size short-track that also sat on the race grounds.  We
had to do all our races on Sundays.

These things were a blast.  32 pounds, a foot or so wide, about 3 feet long,
and I forget how many cc's of gut-wrenching WeedWhacker Motor power!

Larry


> I did the rc plane thing for about 10 years myself, the last 4 years of
> which I flew cometition pattern.
> Even fly in the AMA Nationals one year.

> Been a long time since I flew RC,  guess about 11 years now.

> Don Burnette


> > I used to fly RC Helicopters for a few years. That was good fun :)

> > Achim



> >> Fortunately for me Joachim Im on my way out the door for a road trip
> >> to my nearest EB.  I used to do the RC thing but my eyes aren't good
> >> nuff anymore (too many planes just flew away) and the RC radio
> >> causes an incessant buzzing in my ears :)  Oh you meant Road Course
> >> not Remote Control hehe.

Joachim Trens

new n2003 demo out

by Joachim Trens » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:34:43

Yep that stuff was expensive as hell, especially since when you wrecked it
always cost a lot in spare parts.

I started I think around 82 with a Schlueter, which was wrong for a beginner
as with every heavy touchdown you'd bend the metal chassis, leading to cogs
and everything else no longer running together well, and evrything getting
destroyed pretty quickly.

A year later when I'd ruined that first one beyond repair I switched to a
used Jet Ranger based on the Heim system which was indeed pretty advanced in
technology, and also looked like the real thing. Repairs to the main
mechanics were easier as all you'd normally ruin was the main rotor shaft (I
used to carry with me a few backup ones at all times). The body was wood and
glass fibre, so fixing it wasn't so expensive.

Once I'd learnt to fly well I bought two kevlar bodies of the Hughes 500 D
model. They were also designed to take the Heim system, and their kevlar
bodies were so robust that you could throw them down from 10 meters altitude
with the rotor running and all the happened was that the connection between
tail and main body broke. Very easy to fix. Well, of course the blades and
main rotor shaft were also splinters <g>

The greatest development was when gyros became avialable. I installed one
for the tail rotor and from then on it was like you were on auto-pilot and
the cost for repairs dropped dramatically :-)

I equipped those Hughes with 3-blade main rotors (5 blade would have been
even more expensive to repair after a crash <g>) and also a 3 blade tail
rotor, which really added control. Unfortunately I moved away from the site
where I used to fly, and couldn't find a decent spot where to fly from
nearby where I had moved to, so after a while I sold everything. But it had
been a great time :)

Achim


Dave Henri

new n2003 demo out

by Dave Henri » Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:59:37


99765.news.dfncis.de:

> Seems to be a no-go.

> Achim



> ...
>> Has anyone tried just dropping the N2k2 version of St Jovite
>> (or other roadcourse) into the demo to see if it ran??

rats  :)   oh well, it was a nice thought...
dave henrie
Eldre

new n2003 demo out

by Eldre » Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:17:35

Geez, another hobby that I would have liked, but couldn't afford...  :-(

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank:-0.381
MonsterRank: +339.873
N2002 Rank:+17.59

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Larr

new n2003 demo out

by Larr » Sat, 08 Feb 2003 03:28:31

Man, you were REALLY in to it :)

I built a Bell 222 with full retracts.  It took me over 2 years.  I never
flew it, and ended up selling it, un-flown and un-started just before
returning to the east coast for good in August of 1990.

I was afraid to fly it.  One problem I never really got over was loss of
orientation in the air.

I could nose-in hover and auto-rotate with the best of them, but for some
reason my eyes had issues with orientation if I inside-turns and the light
was a certain way.  I broke a lot of stuff over that :(  Of course I tried
the usual tricks like colored blades, landing gear, etc...  I suspect a
full-body would have helped but due to the massive hours involved in putting
one together I could never get myself  to go for it.

For those of you who have never done this before, Nose-In Hovering a Radio
Controlled Helicopter is probably the hardest manuever you can attempt to do
on any type of flying model.  It takes dozens and dozens of hours of
practice to do it poorly, and hundreds of hours to do it well.  And most
people eat a certain amount of rotor blades, tail blades and booms in the
process of learning it :)

Larry


> Yep that stuff was expensive as hell, especially since when you wrecked it
> always cost a lot in spare parts.

> I started I think around 82 with a Schlueter, which was wrong for a
beginner
> as with every heavy touchdown you'd bend the metal chassis, leading to
cogs
> and everything else no longer running together well, and evrything getting
> destroyed pretty quickly.

> A year later when I'd ruined that first one beyond repair I switched to a
> used Jet Ranger based on the Heim system which was indeed pretty advanced
in
> technology, and also looked like the real thing. Repairs to the main
> mechanics were easier as all you'd normally ruin was the main rotor shaft
(I
> used to carry with me a few backup ones at all times). The body was wood
and
> glass fibre, so fixing it wasn't so expensive.

> Once I'd learnt to fly well I bought two kevlar bodies of the Hughes 500 D
> model. They were also designed to take the Heim system, and their kevlar
> bodies were so robust that you could throw them down from 10 meters
altitude
> with the rotor running and all the happened was that the connection
between
> tail and main body broke. Very easy to fix. Well, of course the blades and
> main rotor shaft were also splinters <g>

> The greatest development was when gyros became avialable. I installed one
> for the tail rotor and from then on it was like you were on auto-pilot and
> the cost for repairs dropped dramatically :-)

> I equipped those Hughes with 3-blade main rotors (5 blade would have been
> even more expensive to repair after a crash <g>) and also a 3 blade tail
> rotor, which really added control. Unfortunately I moved away from the
site
> where I used to fly, and couldn't find a decent spot where to fly from
> nearby where I had moved to, so after a while I sold everything. But it
had
> been a great time :)

> Achim



> > Me too.  And it's the primary reason I developed NO savings through the
> > latter half of the 1980's :)

> > I had the first Schoonard Xccel in San Diego.  Brought it over when I
was
> on
> > Leave on the East Coast.  All we did was stare at it for weeks, and I
was
> > afraid to fly it it was so pretty :)

> > And yes, I started with the Shuttle (well, 4 or 5 of them, actually :))
> like
> > eveyone else did :)

Joachim Trens

new n2003 demo out

by Joachim Trens » Sat, 08 Feb 2003 08:00:30

After I'd learnt to fly I think I wrecked most of my stuff trying new
aerobatics figures.

A shame you never flew the Bell, it must be a breathtaking sight when it
takes off, transits into that typical forward/upward movement and
simulatenously starts retracting the gear. I'd always thought about building
one myself, but always shied away from it, for the same reasons why you
never flew yours I guess.

I tried the differently coloured landing gear struts as well, but the
problem was, when you were far enough away you could see the body fine but
not the struts <g> but you're right, a full body is in a completely
different ballpark in terms of visibility. I could have my Hughes soar high
and far like a fixed wing RC plane, it was really well visible.

I think I never really perfectioned the nose-in hovering. Probably partly
due to a shock I experienced during my first attempts, when the rear pushrod
for the cyclic came lose from the swashplate (correct term?) and my helo
started flying towards me, and towards me, and towards me... <g>

Achim


Larr

new n2003 demo out

by Larr » Sat, 08 Feb 2003 23:24:05

I forget the guys name, but one of the National Champions used to visit us
in at our field in San Diego every now and then.  He was a Schoonard Xccel
factory Pilot.

This guy could be nose-in hovering about 6 feet off the ground, and about 10
feet away, and he would actually flop his helo into an inverted nose-in
hover and I swear the thing never wavered more than 3 inches in any one
direction when he did it.

This guy was freakin' awesome.

The stupidist thing I ever saw in public?  At the Merced Fly-in one year
this guy (he was a factory owner/flyer as well for a famous model helicopter
company - I won't mention names here) was doing a nose-in hover and walked
up and kissed the nose of his Helicopter.

For those of you who don't understand how incredibly stupid and dangerous
this is, the typical .60 engine sized Helicopter has a rotor-span of like 60
inches.  The blades typicall run at 1800 RPM, and equates to a rotor-tip
speed of about 300 miles per hour.  These blades are NOT all balsa wood.
They tend to have hardwood leading edges, and most experienced pilots run
lead weights embedded at the tips for improved auto-rotation performance.
Some run blades that are FULLY fiberglassed instead of shrink-wrapped.

If you get hit in the head, you die.  Period.  I saw an out-of-control model
Helo completely destroy the fiberglass cap on the back of a pickup truck one
day.

Helicopters, full size or model, are basically Mechanical-***s that god
never intended to fly in the first place and I can think of MUCH better ways
to risk my life.

Larry


> After I'd learnt to fly I think I wrecked most of my stuff trying new
> aerobatics figures.

> A shame you never flew the Bell, it must be a breathtaking sight when it
> takes off, transits into that typical forward/upward movement and
> simulatenously starts retracting the gear. I'd always thought about
building
> one myself, but always shied away from it, for the same reasons why you
> never flew yours I guess.

> I tried the differently coloured landing gear struts as well, but the
> problem was, when you were far enough away you could see the body fine but
> not the struts <g> but you're right, a full body is in a completely
> different ballpark in terms of visibility. I could have my Hughes soar
high
> and far like a fixed wing RC plane, it was really well visible.

> I think I never really perfectioned the nose-in hovering. Probably partly
> due to a shock I experienced during my first attempts, when the rear
pushrod
> for the cyclic came lose from the swashplate (correct term?) and my helo
> started flying towards me, and towards me, and towards me... <g>

> Achim



> > Man, you were REALLY in to it :)

> > I built a Bell 222 with full retracts.  It took me over 2 years.  I
never
> > flew it, and ended up selling it, un-flown and un-started just before
> > returning to the east coast for good in August of 1990...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.