Agent Skulder,
You have been taken off the X-Files. Please continue with your
assigned duty at the Telemetry analysis section.
Sorry Dave, I can't agree. The racing industry is filled with
overlapping interests from sponsorships, previous alliances between
drivers from karting or other leagues, etc. Companies like GM and
Ford are so huge these days that it's hard to not link a driver to
either one and probably sometimes both.
Maclaren didn't have the best car then and Michael wasn't as fortunate
as JV and Damon Hill who were both made to look very good in the
stunning (at the time) Williams. Please JV fans, I don't believe JV
and DH are in the same class, but JV's transition into F1 was made
easier by having a competitive reliable car. His obvious talent has
been demonstrated enough times for me to not admire and respect him.
As for Damon Hill, wellllll. But this isn't the time or place.
As for you DanaFox, I suggest you do the following experiment. Look
for evidence of more improbable things. Say Michael Schumacher versus
Ralf Schumacher or Frank Williams versus Enzo Ferarri(about that
wheelchair accident) or how about Murray Walker versus James Hunt(no
disrespect intended). You could probably find evidence supporting
maliciousness or foul play if you dug deep enough. None of it would
be substantiated or conclusive, I believe, but just as believable as
your Wendlinger - Andretti, Verstappen Montoya conclusions.
I'm having fun with the whole X-Files thing, but I think we should let
it go for a while and enjoy the sport for the entertainment and
technical wizardry on display.
Just curious, are you a Michael Andretti fan? My personal opinion on
him is that although he has become a master in the Cart leagues in
it's various guises, he has not shown the versatility of his dad in
driving other vehicles competitively. Even in Cart, I always felt
that there were more talented (but less consistent) drivers around. I
think it makes these more talented drivers more successful at F1 than
the solid consistent drivers. Much as I dislike his style, I think a
young Paul Tracy would have been a better driver to take to F1 than
Michael.
Just my opinion, Agent Skulder. I enjoy reading yours...
cheers,
Ian
Like Ian said, most historic events can be twisted into a *** if you
try hard enough.
Also, In defense of Michael, he may never garner the respect his father
has/had as a pure race car driver. He might not have the story book career,
but times are quite a bit different from when Mario drove. IMO, anybody that
has a CART championship and podium finishes in CART, F1, and Le Mans has got
to be considered one of the greats.
pez
> >Dave "Skulder"Henrie
> Agent Skulder,
> You have been taken off the X-Files. Please continue with your
> assigned duty at the Telemetry analysis section.
> Sorry Dave, I can't agree. The racing industry is filled with
> overlapping interests from sponsorships, previous alliances between
> drivers from karting or other leagues, etc. Companies like GM and
> Ford are so huge these days that it's hard to not link a driver to
> either one and probably sometimes both.
> Maclaren didn't have the best car then and Michael wasn't as fortunate
> as JV and Damon Hill who were both made to look very good in the
> stunning (at the time) Williams. Please JV fans, I don't believe JV
> and DH are in the same class, but JV's transition into F1 was made
> easier by having a competitive reliable car. His obvious talent has
> been demonstrated enough times for me to not admire and respect him.
> As for Damon Hill, wellllll. But this isn't the time or place.
> As for you DanaFox, I suggest you do the following experiment. Look
> for evidence of more improbable things. Say Michael Schumacher versus
> Ralf Schumacher or Frank Williams versus Enzo Ferarri(about that
> wheelchair accident) or how about Murray Walker versus James Hunt(no
> disrespect intended). You could probably find evidence supporting
> maliciousness or foul play if you dug deep enough. None of it would
> be substantiated or conclusive, I believe, but just as believable as
> your Wendlinger - Andretti, Verstappen Montoya conclusions.
> I'm having fun with the whole X-Files thing, but I think we should let
> it go for a while and enjoy the sport for the entertainment and
> technical wizardry on display.
> Just curious, are you a Michael Andretti fan? My personal opinion on
> him is that although he has become a master in the Cart leagues in
> it's various guises, he has not shown the versatility of his dad in
> driving other vehicles competitively. Even in Cart, I always felt
> that there were more talented (but less consistent) drivers around. I
> think it makes these more talented drivers more successful at F1 than
> the solid consistent drivers. Much as I dislike his style, I think a
> young Paul Tracy would have been a better driver to take to F1 than
> Michael.
> Just my opinion, Agent Skulder. I enjoy reading yours...
> cheers,
> Ian
Tom
I stand corrected :) The Benetton in 1995 wasn't too bad a car to
drive. Probably 2nd only to the Williams, but my memory is not too
good. Mind you, IMO Tracy would have looked a poor second to JV in
terms of the inevitable comparisons people would have made.
Regards,
Ian
>pez
>> the solid consistent drivers. Much as I dislike his style, I think a
>> young Paul Tracy would have been a better driver to take to F1 than
>> Michael.
>Tom
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
F1 hcp. +28.67...F2 +151.26...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.