rec.autos.simulators

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

Chuck Kandle

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Chuck Kandle » Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:00:00


>         I don't know how Toe is measured in GPL.  I'll just assume that (if the
> car was a physical car, one that you could touch) If you took a string
> and laid it across the center of the tire horizontally and parallel to
> the center of the car (front to rear), the Toe would be measured as the
> distance from the string to the edge of the wheel..

>   |
>   |a/-/     \-\
>   |/ /---|---\ \
>   |-     |    -
>   |      |
>   |      |
>   |      |
>    (hope this graphic displays right)

>         Where "a" is is the measuring area.  The Left line is the string, then
> there's the +toe tire, Then axle, then Center line of the chassis.  Then
> the same thing for the Right hand side.  This is one way to measure Toe
> but is it the way GPL measures and displays Toe?  If so, then a + or -
> 5.0 Toe would be a very bad setup.

No, we've done some "shade-tree" toe adjustments on the big busses at
work in the past.  How it's measured is you measure from tire centerline
to tire centerline, both at the front & rear of the tire.  Half that
distance difference is the amount of toe.  Much more accurate, as you
can run across individual wheels with different amounts of toe with your
method, but you must remember that toe tends to equalize when the
vehicle is in motion.

--
/Chuck Kandler  #70
/ChuckK on Won.net & WinVROC
/K&S Racing
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
/The box said "Windows 0x5f or better", so I installed LINUX!

Michael Barlo

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Michael Barlo » Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:00:00



> >         I don't know how Toe is measured in GPL.  I'll just assume that (if the
> > car was a physical car, one that you could touch) If you took a string
> > and laid it across the center of the tire horizontally and parallel to
> > the center of the car (front to rear), the Toe would be measured as the
> > distance from the string to the edge of the wheel..

> >   |
> >   |a/-/     \-\
> >   |/ /---|---\ \
> >   |-     |    -
> >   |      |
> >   |      |
> >   |      |
> >    (hope this graphic displays right)

> >         Where "a" is is the measuring area.  The Left line is the string, then
> > there's the +toe tire, Then axle, then Center line of the chassis.  Then
> > the same thing for the Right hand side.  This is one way to measure Toe
> > but is it the way GPL measures and displays Toe?  If so, then a + or -
> > 5.0 Toe would be a very bad setup.

> No, we've done some "shade-tree" toe adjustments on the big busses at
> work in the past.  How it's measured is you measure from tire centerline
> to tire centerline, both at the front & rear of the tire.  Half that
> distance difference is the amount of toe.  Much more accurate, as you
> can run across individual wheels with different amounts of toe with your
> method, but you must remember that toe tends to equalize when the
> vehicle is in motion.

        You are right, that is another way to measure Toe.  There are many
different ways to measure Toe-in/out and none are more accurate then the
others unless you count in the digital meters.. :)  

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow
Current GPVL points Champion
=========================================

Michael Barlo

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Michael Barlo » Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:00:00

        oops, I thought about it just after I sent that massage.. Your way will
give a Track for the Front or rear wheels (Dog Tracking), as well as
giving a good indication of Toe in/out but not accurate for the
alignment of the chassis -to- wheels toe.   Unless you boo-boo'ed with
your typing and meant to say that you measure from center (front then
rear) of the wheel to the center of the chassis.  If so, then both of
our ways are identical only I move the center chassis line to the out
side for easy access.

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow
Current GPVL points Champion
=========================================

Jim Alliso

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Jim Alliso » Fri, 25 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:04:56 -0500, "Jim Allison"

> Do you have any views on Lotus setups at all, or do you not drive it?

> Mauricio.

I drove the Lotus when I first started GPL and I tried some other car
but later on I decided to use the Eagle all the time. I found that for me
using one car made learning how to do setups easier. Now that I have
a better feel for setting up a race car I think I'll try the Lotus again.

I expect that I'll be able to use much the same philosophy as I did
with the Eagle. I'll just need to use the Lotus numbers on R. Nunnini's
setup tables. And of course I'll need to adapt to the more nimble
response of the Lotus.

Grant Reev

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Grant Reev » Sat, 26 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> Doesn't sound like the best way to balance a car's handling - by
> compensating for the power oversteer by dialling in more understeer.
> The reason the 60 deg diff is so oversteery is because the outside
> rear locks too easily when power is transferred from the slipping
> inside rear. You don't get that gradual transfer of torque via the
> clutches that you do with an 85 deg diff. Just seems to be
> compensating for a lack of rear end grip with reducing the front end
> grip.

probably :) But it seems to be getting relatively predictable. If I
apply too much power the rear will definitely step way too far out,
that's when the outside rear gets loose, but if I'm applying the power
very carefully and smoothly it tends to just step around a little and
feels like it's really biting and taking off.

yes, i agree completely, these lower power side diff angles are much
less consistant :) I tried using a 45 at one point, but I just can't
apply power predictably, the rear WILL come around on me. the 30 was
the same but worse. I think my older driving habits involved using
too much throttle, and 85 doesn't punish you for doing that.
I don't really like using 85's because of the inside rear wheelspin,
but normally I don't use 5-6 clutches either. I autocross my road car
(which is a mid engined rear wheel drive 2 seater) so I want to if
possible set up my GPL cars in such a way as to teach me the correct
habits, not bad habits - such as using too much throttle on exit
because the 85 diff lets me get away with it. I'm having proper
clutch type diff in it soon, (an improvement over the viscous fluid
type one in there now) so I really want to have my driving habits
tuned for cars that lock the rear wheels together somewhat under
acceleration :)

Also, I've been reliably setting PBs lately with these 60/60 setups.
So they must be doing something right :)

Grant.

Rafe McAulif

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Rafe McAulif » Sun, 27 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Exactly what I was referring to, the lack of effect on top speed with
toe in/out.

Rafe Mc

Rafe McAulif

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Rafe McAulif » Sun, 27 Feb 2000 04:00:00

What are you referring to, by "factors other than camber"? Do you mean
that the left tyres are hot on the outside in a right hander, but then
even out for a left hander? If so, then you seem to be sacrificing the
loaded tyres for when they become the unloaded tyres in the next
corner. Obviously it is ideal to get the most from all 4 tyres, but
since the loaded tyres are doing the majority of the work, I have put
most attention to the loaded ones. Like cutting the apex over the
grass is no big deal, usually quicker. Get the loaded tyres on the
grass though, and wham!

Same here, great resource. Currently using his ideas on linking ride
height with spring rate, seems to work a treat.
No, what I was referring to was developing a setup, and then adjusting
tyree pressures later to suit. He recommends setting pressures, then
altering the setup to get the right temp and pressure combo.

Rafe Mc

Michael Barlo

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Michael Barlo » Sun, 27 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> >Actually the zero camber tires have higher temps on the outside due to
> >factors other than camber. So when I go into a left turn the temps even
> >out, indicating that the inside tire is flat on the track.

> What are you referring to, by "factors other than camber"? Do you mean
> that the left tyres are hot on the outside in a right hander, but then
> even out for a left hander? If so, then you seem to be sacrificing the
> loaded tyres for when they become the unloaded tyres in the next
> corner. Obviously it is ideal to get the most from all 4 tyres, but
> since the loaded tyres are doing the majority of the work, I have put
> most attention to the loaded ones. Like cutting the apex over the
> grass is no big deal, usually quicker. Get the loaded tyres on the
> grass though, and wham!

        um, Don't quote me but I think he's talking about "Thrust Camber".  I
haven't a clue how accurate the math is in GPL but I do know it is
modeled

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow
Current GPVL points Champion
=========================================

Jim Alliso

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Jim Alliso » Mon, 28 Feb 2000 04:00:00



> > >Actually the zero camber tires have higher temps on the outside due to
> > >factors other than camber. So when I go into a left turn the temps even
> > >out, indicating that the inside tire is flat on the track.

> > What are you referring to, by "factors other than camber"? Do you mean
> > that the left tyres are hot on the outside in a right hander, but then
> > even out for a left hander? If so, then you seem to be sacrificing the
> > loaded tyres for when they become the unloaded tyres in the next
> > corner. Obviously it is ideal to get the most from all 4 tyres, but
> > since the loaded tyres are doing the majority of the work, I have put
> > most attention to the loaded ones. Like cutting the apex over the
> > grass is no big deal, usually quicker. Get the loaded tyres on the
> > grass though, and wham!

> um, Don't quote me but I think he's talking about "Thrust Camber".  I
> haven't a clue how accurate the math is in GPL but I do know it is
> modeled

> --
> =========================================
> Mike Barlow
> Current GPVL points Champion
> =========================================

Sorry Rafe and Mike, I should have been more specific. I was referring
to the temperatures on the straight and I wasn't thinking of camber thrust.

As an aside, I understand that camber thrust provides extra grip in a
similar
way to a pencil eraser dragged across a desk but tilted away from its
direction of travel. To get this effect on a tire you would need to set the
camber to get even temperatures in a turn (indicating the tire is flat on
the
track) and then increase the camber a little further so that the tire is
actually
tilted away from the outside of the turn. I hope this is the correct
interpretation.

I'm aiming to get the unloaded (inside) tire flat in the turns (as indicated
by
even temperatures). My 0 degree camber on the front and rear left side
tires at Zandvoort result in a higher temperature on the outside of those
tires on the straight. So when I enter a left hand bend the temperatures
even out and give me a flat tire (so to speak).

Now, the preceding discussion seems a little strange since along the
straight
you would expect a 0 degree camber to give you even temperatures across
the tire. This is where my use of 'factors other than camber' comes from.
I'm not sure what accounts for the uneven temperatures. Perhaps the large
front toe-out and large rear toe-in may account for this.

Jim Alliso

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Jim Alliso » Mon, 28 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> > >Actually the zero camber tires have higher temps on the outside due to
> > >factors other than camber. So when I go into a left turn the temps even
> > >out, indicating that the inside tire is flat on the track.

> > What are you referring to, by "factors other than camber"? Do you mean
> > that the left tyres are hot on the outside in a right hander, but then
> > even out for a left hander? If so, then you seem to be sacrificing the
> > loaded tyres for when they become the unloaded tyres in the next
> > corner. Obviously it is ideal to get the most from all 4 tyres, but
> > since the loaded tyres are doing the majority of the work, I have put
> > most attention to the loaded ones. Like cutting the apex over the
> > grass is no big deal, usually quicker. Get the loaded tyres on the
> > grass though, and wham!

Rafe, re. your question in the 2nd paragraph above: yes, I run hot on
the outside left of the loaded tire in a right hander and thus the temps
even
out in a left hander. I think Giovanni Tifosi's explanation is better than
what I can cobble together. See "Keeping the Unloaded Tire Flat" in
his Guru Meditations on R. Nunnini's site.
Michael Barlo

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Michael Barlo » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00

        Again, I may be wrong but.. At 0 camber you do have even temps (to a
point) what gives a higher temp at one edge is your toe + or -.  

--
=========================================
Mike Barlow
Current GPVL points Champion
=========================================

Rafe McAulif

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Rafe McAulif » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00

To quote R Nunnini:

Don't bother to keep the inside temperature higher than the outside -
to take advantageof the legendary camber thrust - because it doesn't
appear to be modelled in GPL. In any case,  Carroll Smith reckons that
you need to keep the inside of the tires about 15F hotter than the
outside to take full advantage of it - which would require
unacceptable amounts of static camber in GPL.

I think an important point is " doesn't appear to be modelled in GPL".
Anyone know if it is or not? My guess is that Nunnini's point is valid
- that you would need too much -ve camber to achieve it, which would
make the car hard to drive. Maybe possible in real life, but a bit too
tough for GPL.

Rafe Mc

Gregor Vebl

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Gregor Vebl » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00


> To quote R Nunnini:

> Don't bother to keep the inside temperature higher than the outside -
> to take advantageof the legendary camber thrust - because it doesn't
> appear to be modelled in GPL. In any case,  Carroll Smith reckons that
> you need to keep the inside of the tires about 15F hotter than the
> outside to take full advantage of it - which would require
> unacceptable amounts of static camber in GPL.

> I think an important point is " doesn't appear to be modelled in GPL".
> Anyone know if it is or not? My guess is that Nunnini's point is valid
> - that you would need too much -ve camber to achieve it, which would
> make the car hard to drive. Maybe possible in real life, but a bit too
> tough for GPL.

> Rafe Mc

It appears to be modelled. Try setting the left tyres with negative and
the right ones with positive camber, and then see how much steering you
require to keep the car straight.

Another interesting point is, if you are using lots of positive camber,
then you should also use some toe out to stop the wheels fighting each
other (this is taken from the Millikens' 'Race Car Vehicle Dynamics').

Don Scurlo

Finally developed my own GPL setup...

by Don Scurlo » Tue, 29 Feb 2000 04:00:00

What would be neat is if our resident track building genius would constuct a
GPL skid pad, with painted lines, built in lap timer, and tire temp readout.
Just dreaming out loud.

--
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.