> =
> =
> Have to agree with you there. I wasn't expecting much from m=
y P133
> after I read some of the comments here. Granted, I can't have *all* th=
e
> textures on, but I have it on full detail, and only about 4 textures of=
f, and it
> looks simply *incredible* and it plays as smoothly and quickly as I wou=
ld like
> it to (on almost all the tracks). The game simply does *not* need a P-=
600 to
> look fantastic, as so many here have suggested. (And my god is the gam=
e fun...)
> :)
> =
> --Evan
> =
> -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-=
-.-
> - =3D Internet Top 100 Video Games Charts =A9 =3D -
> New U.S. mirror! http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> ***Just e-mail me for the latest Top 100 Chart!***
I would agree that you do not need a P6 to run the game in an
attractive manner. It is awesome on the 133, with some adjustments.
It is also, beyond belief on the P6/200 as well...hehehehe
JEB in Vegas