"No comment!"
Tom Pabst
> > The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures,
> > even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has
> > just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film.
> > --
> > -asbjxrn
> Maybe it's drawing less cars behind?
>I'll have to apologise to the West brothers, as in the two cases I was
>WRONG. And the reason why it's not 1) parked cars or 2) a digital
>alteration is pretty exciting, but I won't say more ;-D
>I'll now eat my words...
><prints his post and eats the paper eh>
(ie, remove certain cars, change angles and all that on the fly)
-Slash
--
"Ebert Victorious" - The Onion
/Carl
> >> I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is
> >> ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures.
> >I'll have to apologise to the West brothers, as in the two cases I was
> >WRONG. And the reason why it's not 1) parked cars or 2) a digital
> >alteration is pretty exciting, but I won't say more ;-D
> >I'll now eat my words...
> ><prints his post and eats the paper eh>
> Dynamic race replay editor?
> (ie, remove certain cars, change angles and all that on the fly)
> -Slash
> --
> "Ebert Victorious" - The Onion
Tom
-:)
or a live "spectator" feed?
cheers
JM
