> Bruce.
>>Do I need to be in order to make a simple comparison using my eyes?
This is twice in a week I've seen people imply that you should buy a sim
so that you can see for yourself how bad it is.
WTF?
So then what Bruce? Maybe -
"Hi everyone. I went out and got the 'Best Thing Since Sliced Bread
Racing Sim' and I agree with you all - it's a complete waste of money!".
??????????????
> FFS, Bruce, I just offered an opinion based on the trailer, which is
> all anyone can do at this point. I'm not sure why you're getting all
> up in arms about it.
Bruce seems a bit angry these days, maybe old age *is* finally getting
to him ;^)
All the best, uwe
--
GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
>>"RAS's judgement"?
>>You need others to make up your mind for you?
> This is twice in a week I've seen people imply that you should buy a sim
> so that you can see for yourself how bad it is.
> WTF?
> So then what Bruce? Maybe -
> "Hi everyone. I went out and got the 'Best Thing Since Sliced Bread
> Racing Sim' and I agree with you all - it's a complete waste of money!".
> ??????????????
Also, between 1989 and 1998, I was involved with a computer-entertainment
retailer and could "test" games to my heart's content.
Over the past seven years I have only bought a handful of "games" (mostly
Papyrus), one of which I was involved with at the beta level. Others that
have passed across my HDD have usually been sourced by my son (very handy!),
a notable exception being Grand Prix Legends and I didn't need a review to
buy that....it was going to be bought from the first day I read about its
development.
But if I *were* to be influenced by reviews, there is only one source that
would hold that power over me, and that is the magazine Computer ***
World. An exceptionally-fine magazine in a ***-world of journalistic
crap.
Bruce
> Hehe, yep, you're right of course. Like Bruce has never been influenced
