rec.autos.simulators

F1 2002 slow framerates

adsale

F1 2002 slow framerates

by adsale » Wed, 21 Aug 2002 04:49:26


> "Goy Larsen"

> > Even simpler is to run "msconfig" and set memory to 512 under the
> > "advanced" tab.......I'm disappointed in you Dave, thought you knew this
> > by now....:-)

> > Beers and cheers
> > (uncle) Goy

>    Of course I know that...but hey...it just adds another little process
> that is running in the background.  I've always advocated hardware
> reduction(removing the chip) vs software fixin'(clicking a check box
> somewheres)
> dh

Good one

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:55:53


Apart from that big smokin' hole in your wallet that the XP
purchase burned... right? ;-)

Cheers,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Some Call Me Ti

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Some Call Me Ti » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 03:40:31

">

Tru it ain't cheap but it's the best around at the moment . Why would you
spend huge amounst of cash on a shiny new high speed system and lumber it
with on old operating system just to save a few pennies. Really you should
always run an operating system that is contemorary your hardware. i.e on an
6 year old p1 stick to windows 95 and with a new p4 use xp. There again
windows 3.11 really flies on a 2gig p4 ;-)

Some Call Me Tim

J

F1 2002 slow framerates

by J » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:56:52

That's the problem.
My GF2 GTS 64 DDR gives up to 20 depending on the resolution.
So your GF4 should be way higher.

JensSchumi



---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:21:32


Hi Tim,

I just upgraded my *** rig to a shiny new Athlon on a shiny
new ECS mobo. Win98SE runs fine on this combo, no need to
register, no need to accept yet another even more stupid EULA,
and best of all, no need to spend 10,000's of pennies on MS tax.

If I want a new operating system on this box I'll go for Linux,
but your mileage may vary. It's a *** only box anyway, all
my productive stuff is secure on the Linux box sitting next to
it ;-)

Unless you use really new hardware that doesn't come with "old"
drivers for 9x systems (don't know if something like that even
exists), I see no reason at all to run XP, even less to spend
money on it. But again, YMMV.

Bye for now & happy racing,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

checkmysignat..

F1 2002 slow framerates

by checkmysignat.. » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:36:51

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:21:32 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp


>I just upgraded my *** rig to a shiny new Athlon on a shiny
>new ECS mobo. Win98SE runs fine on this combo, no need to
>register, no need to accept yet another even more stupid EULA,
>and best of all, no need to spend 10,000's of pennies on MS tax.

That wouldn't happen to be a ECS K7S5A would it?  This must be the
most popular mobo ever made.  :)  Great board, everyone I know has it.

--
karkrazy AT softhome DOT net

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:02:25


> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:21:32 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp
> That wouldn't happen to be a ECS K7S5A would it?  This must be the
> most popular mobo ever made.  :)  Great board, everyone I know has it.

yep, it's the k7s5a/LAN. Should take us up to Athlon 2200+
speeds, dirt cheap and rock stable. It disabled the onboard
sound though, and continue to use my trusty old sblive! value
with it.

cheers,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Dave Henri

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Dave Henri » Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:11:53

"Uwe Schuerkamp"
    > Unless you use really new hardware that doesn't come with "old"

   Just for the record....I did NOT pay Uwe to say that......  lol
dave henrie

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:57:37


>    Just for the record....I did NOT pay Uwe to say that......  lol
> dave henrie

Ha! You were still playing pitfall on your 800XL when I was
already hacking OS/9 on my mighty BBC Dragon 64!!! Multitasking
/ multiuser in 64kb of RAM, off a single floppy!!! ;-)

Cheers,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Dave Henri

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Dave Henri » Fri, 23 Aug 2002 14:46:48

"Uwe Schuerkamp"

  Atari800?  Please...:)
I had a Commodore 64 with two disk drives, the second was rewired so I could
run both simultaenously.(I can't remember why I had to do that, but I
connected a wire to the circuit board and then to a switch I installed in
the case...)  (a working memory would be a wonderful thing to have)
If I tried that trick these days I would probably melt down the entire power
grid for my neighborhood.  Me and tools no longer like each other.   I was
making laser printed newsletters with GEOS before even Apple knew what a GUI
was. .
  THEN after the C-64 came the real machine...Yes I was an Amiganaut.  A500
with an extra half meg of ram.  Multi-tasking, built in stereo sound,  a Ram
disk,  I was flying a full color semi-dynamic Real time campaign via Falcon:
Operation Fighting Tiger(or some such name) before there was even a stick
drawn Falcon AT.
   Atari 800?  naw...they were the dark side.
     At this point in time,  OS 9 wasn't even on the drawing boards....  :)

dave henrie

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:15:03


> "Uwe Schuerkamp"
> I had a Commodore 64 with two disk drives, the second was rewired so I could
> run both simultaenously.(I can't remember why I had to do that, but I

The Dragon 64 (the machine that could run OS/9 back then) was
"hot" during the same time as the C64, just not as hot as the
Commodore machine. It never took off as good as the C64 did
although it had much faster I/O and higher gfx resolutions, but
what the heck.

I'm with you there. I went for the Amiga route too after my
Dragon days... fabulous machine to have (I still own three;
A500, A500+ and a A1200) Aztec C + Assembler all the way, baby.
Great stuff! AREXX (send email from CygnusEd via VLT by the
single press of a button? Sure! ;-), Blitter, Copper, ach I
loved it. I still dream of setting up a friends abandonded
A4000 one of these days... Speedball. Kick Off II, Sensible
Soccer, MechForce. What fun we had!

Wrong! OS9 was out and about long before. It's not OS/2 I'm
talking about.

On topic: does anyone know if a Linux version of RFL is
planned? ;-)

Cheers,

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Rolf Weseman

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Rolf Weseman » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 05:14:31

Hey, I'm feeling at home!!!!!

I missed the starting thread, but I was on the sunny side: I had an Amiga
1000 and than an 2000 with (no joke) 9 MB Ram!!!! The DOS-people had just 64
up to max 640, hehe. They said to me, if I told this, I must have made an
error, I would mean 90 Kb, hehe. We worked close with Commodore Marketing
and we all tried to make the 2000 THE graphics machine. This was some years
before Apple Macintosh hit it! But Commodore didn't do anything in the
direction of us professional graphic users , only warm air, as we say in
Germany! So we sold our Amigas, bought some HPs and started with Xerox
Ventura Publisher in a beta!!! I think, noone knows this yet, hehe. And
after some years, we switched to Apple and stayed there until now, rather
happy, with the only problem, that GPL isn't running on it!

Yesterday, I remembered playing EA's F1 2002 that one of my first games was
a very very great EA game on the Amiga: I don't remember the name, you had
to roll a ball throug different 3d-structures and the graphics were (for
that time) superb. (Yesterday, I had the name of the game, ....the
age...;-)))

Maybe, I find the disk (720KB, isn't it)

Rolf

Dave Henri

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Dave Henri » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 11:42:26

"Rolf Wesemann" >
 Yesterday, I remembered playing EA's F1 2002 that one of my first games was
  it was kinda a 3/4 perspective...like a half a pyramid with the top near
the upper left, and the bottom near the lower right....(But what was the
name???  dunno)
    EA was the first game company to FAKE an electric guitar sound that
didn't sound like cheesy toy guitars.
 dave henrie

J

F1 2002 slow framerates

by J » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 12:17:19

Very good value for the money.
I had twice one for tempary replacement for my K7T266a board.
My findings:
The ECS is recognizable slower, very stable, has problems with 512 MB (SDram and
ME), bios features a bit on the poor side.

This didn't stop me to build my father a system based on this board, since he
needs a reliable workhorse and no peek performance.

Cya
JensSchumi





>> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:21:32 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp

>> That wouldn't happen to be a ECS K7S5A would it?  This must be the
>> most popular mobo ever made.  :)  Great board, everyone I know has it.

>yep, it's the k7s5a/LAN. Should take us up to Athlon 2200+
>speeds, dirt cheap and rock stable. It disabled the onboard
>sound though, and continue to use my trusty old sblive! value
>with it.

>cheers,

>uwe

---------------------------------------------
LWFF Ball Bearing conversion at:
http://jensschumi.bravepages.com/

GPLRank: -14.82
Monsters of GPL: sub 95

Uwe Schuerkam

F1 2002 slow framerates

by Uwe Schuerkam » Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:13:03


> "Rolf Wesemann" >
>  Yesterday, I remembered playing EA's F1 2002 that one of my first games was
>> a very very great EA game on the Amiga: I don't remember the name, you had
>> to roll a ball throug different 3d-structures and the graphics were (for
>> that time) superb. (Yesterday, I had the name of the game, ....the
>> age...;-)))

>> Maybe, I find the disk (720KB, isn't it)

no, 880kb. We even beat the PC's in that regard back then ;-)

"Marble Madness", right?

uwe

--
mail replies to Uwe at schuerkamp dot de ( yahoo address is spambox)
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.