>>get slowdowns at the start of a race with more than 15 cars. Can't wait for
>>the AMD price cut to happen and be a K6'n fool.
>>BTW, anybody hear about that AMD cut? Was supposed to happen no
>>later than the first week of Feb.
>From what I've heard, an MMX or P2 has much better floating point
>performance than a K6, and from what I understand, floating point
>performance is the most important factor here. I would consult an expert
>before I went for a K6.
I have a K6 200 MMX and it runs all sim's fine, using a 3dfx accel.
FYI: The K6 can exec MMX instructions and FPU instructions
in the same bit stream without slowdowns of the Intel chips.
AMD provided seperate registers for MMX and FPU, whereas
Intel used the same one's and just renamed them. Currnet
K6 200 MMX chips may be slower on FPU in some cases
( non MMX ), but AMD is adding more pipeline to the FPU
on the next rev ( K6 300 Mzh), and the K6+3D will have
some new and powerful 3D instructions of it's own.
Whether software vendor's will support these
new instructions remains to be seen.
bill valentine
-----------------------------------