rec.autos.simulators

by **Byron Forbe** » Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:42:49

Who?

But anyway, assuming this is some sort of demented reference to the
NFL, whilst off topic, I'd just like to say, to the undoubted delight of
all Patriot and Ram supporters, that the result of Superbowl 36 will be
null and void. The Raiders beat the Pats, would have beaten the Steelers
and then the Rams anyway. :)

Sorry, I'm still bleeding about that fumble - yeah, that's right -
"FUMBLE!" :)

> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

by **Stuart Becktel** » Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:46:58

They are called complete sentences for a reason...so you can UNDERSTAND WHAT
THE HELL THE DEMENTED MORON ON THE OTHER SIDE IS SAYING...
-Stuart Becktell

by **Dave Henri** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:19:36

"Byron Forbes"
< The Raiders beat the Pats, would have beaten the Steelers

> and then the Rams anyway. :)

> Sorry, I'm still bleeding about that fumble - yeah, that's right -
> "FUMBLE!" :)

Byron, Byron, Byron, are you still under the misunderstanding that the
Raiders would have had a ghost of a chance against the Rams? I agree, the
call was bad, but you really should be thankful that it keeps the Silver &
Black from getting run past/over/around on Sunday.
:)
dave henrie

by **Todd Sorense** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:46:59

No kidding. What were the Raiders in the last 5 games, 1 and 4?
Hardly a powerhouse.

> "Byron Forbes"
> < The Raiders beat the Pats, would have beaten the Steelers
> > and then the Rams anyway. :)

> > Sorry, I'm still bleeding about that fumble - yeah, that's right -
> > "FUMBLE!" :)

> Byron, Byron, Byron, are you still under the misunderstanding that the
> Raiders would have had a ghost of a chance against the Rams? I agree, the
> call was bad, but you really should be thankful that it keeps the Silver &
> Black from getting run past/over/around on Sunday.
> :)
> dave henrie

by rb » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 02:12:12

hey stuart!

ooooh wheeeee!

i've been looking for a cool signature line. mind if i
quote you? you'll be known far and wide. hehe.

by **rik zeppeli** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 02:13:49

actually it's the seventh if you check.

by **Eldre** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 05:55:01

>actually it's the seventh if you check.

>> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

Nope, the game is actually on the third...check your calendar...

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...

Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **Stuart Becktel** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 07:19:30

Haha...yea...I might use that my self.
-Stuart Becktell

by **rik zeppeli** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:55:11

> >actually it's the seventh if you check.

> >> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

> Nope, the game is actually on the third...check your calendar...

duuuuuuhhhh
7th superbowl in N.O.

by **Stuart Becktel** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 11:02:09

'bout as bad a message as the first if you ask me...

zeppelin"

> > >actually it's the seventh if you check.

> > >> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

> > Nope, the game is actually on the third...check your calendar...

> duuuuuuhhhh
> 7th superbowl in N.O.

by **Chris H** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:16:24

Inaccurate, too: This is the ninth Super Bowl in New Orleans.
Source: http://www.superbowl.com/
--
Chris H.

zeppelin"

> > >actually it's the seventh if you check.

> > >> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

> > Nope, the game is actually on the third...check your calendar...

> duuuuuuhhhh
> 7th superbowl in N.O.

by **FallingAc** » Mon, 04 Feb 2002 14:29:13

The general opinion is the call was right. The problem is the rule used to
make the call was bad. Look for it to be changed in the offseason.

by **rik zeppeli** » Tue, 05 Feb 2002 04:49:03

there you have it.
Chris H wins, hands down.

> Inaccurate, too: This is the ninth Super Bowl in New Orleans.
> Source: http://www.superbowl.com/
> --
> Chris H.

> zeppelin"

> > > >actually it's the seventh if you check.

> > > >> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

> > > Nope, the game is actually on the third...check your calendar...

> > duuuuuuhhhh
> > 7th superbowl in N.O.

by **Jonny Hodgso** » Tue, 05 Feb 2002 05:38:24

> Rams are going to be the in the fifth.

Derby are going to be in the fifth what?

Jonny

by **Chris H** » Tue, 05 Feb 2002 12:13:05

Doesn't matter now: New England Patriots 20, Los Ange . . . Oops! St. Louis
Rams 17. Final. Over and done.
--
Chris H.