rec.autos.simulators

Most realistic sim today?

Dave Henri

Most realistic sim today?

by Dave Henri » Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:28:20


  Real english....American style.

  She done it...I seen her.

dh

Dave Henri

Most realistic sim today?

by Dave Henri » Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:34:34



  Here's one to chew on.  My time for the Nurburgring is something like
9:18 in GPL and 8:12 in GTR.  So which is more real?

alex

Most realistic sim today?

by alex » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:35:19






>> > says...


>> > > > Where does GTR and GT Legends fit?

>> > > You mean, where _do_ GTR and GT Legends fit?

>> >   I like to learn and have no problem with you pointing out common
>> > English errors Sno... errr, Bruce, but it would be nice if you stated
>> > WHY it is incorrect and maybe gave an example or two.

>> I do
>> You do
>> He/she/it does
>> We do
>> You do
>> They do

>> ? :)

> In other words, you have to take GTR and GT Legends as a pair and not
> two singular items.  So it would fit under the 'They do' line instead of
> the 'it and it does' line.

So the correct phrase would be
"Where does {GTR,GT Legends} fit?"
:)
Bob

Most realistic sim today?

by Bob » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:58:52

Interesting, but not really relevant.  The degree of difficulty in
obtaining a certain lap speed and the degree to which the simulation
responds realistically to setup and control inputs are actually two
different things.  IOW, just because it is difficult to go fast around
the Ring in GPL doesn't necessarily mean GPL is more realistic.

BTW, I concede I just forgot RBR, and that it belongs at or near the
top of the list.

Jan Verschuere

Most realistic sim today?

by Jan Verschuere » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 01:53:48

"Dave Henrie" ...

I'd call that a draw, seeing as a moderately quick time in both is about 40
seconds quicker. <g>

Jan.
=---

Pete

Most realistic sim today?

by Pete » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:21:19








> >> > says...


> >> > > > Where does GTR and GT Legends fit?

> >> > > You mean, where _do_ GTR and GT Legends fit?

> >> >   I like to learn and have no problem with you pointing out common
> >> > English errors Sno... errr, Bruce, but it would be nice if you stated
> >> > WHY it is incorrect and maybe gave an example or two.

> >> I do
> >> You do
> >> He/she/it does
> >> We do
> >> You do
> >> They do

> >> ? :)

> > In other words, you have to take GTR and GT Legends as a pair and not
> > two singular items.  So it would fit under the 'They do' line instead of
> > the 'it and it does' line.
> So the correct phrase would be
> "Where does {GTR,GT Legends} fit?"
> :)

No, that's even worse.  :)

--
Pete Ives
Remove All_stRESS before sending me an email

alex

Most realistic sim today?

by alex » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:12:38










>> >> > says...


>> >> > > > Where does GTR and GT Legends fit?

>> >> > > You mean, where _do_ GTR and GT Legends fit?

>> >> >   I like to learn and have no problem with you pointing out
>> >> >   common
>> >> > English errors Sno... errr, Bruce, but it would be nice if you
>> >> > stated WHY it is incorrect and maybe gave an example or two.

>> >> I do
>> >> You do
>> >> He/she/it does
>> >> We do
>> >> You do
>> >> They do

>> >> ? :)

>> > In other words, you have to take GTR and GT Legends as a pair and
>> > not two singular items.  So it would fit under the 'They do' line
>> > instead of the 'it and it does' line.
>> So the correct phrase would be
>> "Where does {GTR,GT Legends} fit?"
>> :)

> No, that's even worse.  :)

Trying to rephrase it once more :)
"Where does the set of games consisting of and only of GTR and GT Legends
fit?"
Chad Roger

Most realistic sim today?

by Chad Roger » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:02:10

WRONG!!  Which bugs do you feel have carried over to GTL from GTR, I'd love
to hear them.  Legends uses the Gmotor2 and it has been stated that the G is
for graphics and rFactor uses the same motor/engine.

--

Mika Takal

Most realistic sim today?

by Mika Takal » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:13:34


yep,  GTLegends only uses the rFactor graphics engine, every other thing
(including multiplayer&physics engine) is the same as in GTR. Calling those
as basically the same is wrong, because graphics only make a part of a game
engine... Then again, it is how the user sees/feels it that counts. If the
user only sees the graphics, thats fine to me.... but a game experince has
to do with physics and multiplayer as well.

I haven't personally played the release version of GTLegends, but judging
from what I've heard, the multiplayer is currently just as buggy as it was
in GTR  (and still is, and I'll bet that there will be no more patches as
90% of the GTR/GTL dev people have now left Simbin...). I'm about to give
GTLegends a fair chance when my cousin buys it, though :)

--
Mika Takala

Byron Forbe

Most realistic sim today?

by Byron Forbe » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:47:15


rFactor hands down

    very snuggly in the bargainbin (Bargainbin = Simbin's new Company Name)
and very closely followed by the garbage bin

Byron Forbe

Most realistic sim today?

by Byron Forbe » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:47:07


    Haven't bumped into the F3 mod yet? Formula Ford? Formula 1? A little
editing and all those things are right there.

Jeff Rei

Most realistic sim today?

by Jeff Rei » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:02:07

In my opinion, does it really matter? Will racing game skills translate into actual driving skills? Hard to say. If the
tracks are acurate, a racing game could help. However, once in a real car and on a real track, it's going to look and
obviously feel different.

To me, what counts is if the game is enjoyable.

Grand Prix Legends seems to take the longest to learn, mostly because it has the highest power to weight ratio for
non-downforce cars, and no assist features. Some mention that setups don't affect the cars much, but do the cars handle
realistically? I've never driven a real 1967 F1 car, so I can't know, but it seems close enough for me.

F1C99-02 F1's and rFactor Formulas have a very high power to weight ratio, but once at speed (about 100mph or so), the
downforce makes these cars pretty easy to drive.

GTR went through a few releases (from the 1.0 version) to get rid of the reaction of a car almost always facing
backwards at the slighest loss of traction in the rear. The cars are still a bit squirrely when running against the
curbing at Spa's bus stop, something that doesn't seem to happen on the real cars that routinely go over the curbing
there, for example, this F1 car:

http://jeffareid.net/cgi-bin/spaf1.wmv

rFactor has several different cars. I've mostly done my hot lapping with the Formula at Toban, and it seems very similar
to F1C99-02. I also ran the advanced trainer series about 8 times on a 2nd persona to "earn" credits for the Formula via
career mode instead of using the ISI_BABYFACTORY code that I uses for my primary persona. The main thing I notice with
rFactor is that downshifting seems to slow a car down quicker than I expected, and it can also be used to setup a pretty
good drift in the the cars (with assists on).

I'm not a purist though, as I can enjoy Need For Speed High Stakes as much as any simulation oriented game, and NFSHS
has the most arcadish physics of any racing game I'm aware of, but it's very challenging, even more so than some
simulation oriented games (if you go beyond just beating the AI cars and actually attempt to get good lap times,
comparable to what online players can achieve).

If you look at my racing game video page:
http://jeffareid.net/cgi-bin/rgv.htm
You can see that I've played several arcade type games as well as the simulation type games. I find both enjoyable.

Chad Roger

Most realistic sim today?

by Chad Roger » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:21:24

I would argue physics about GTL and GTR with you all day compared to rFactor
which is based on what?  GTL and Simbin have access to all of the "real
world" data and use it to build the physics engine.  Why would Simbin use an
older physics model when they paid to use the new one?  Multi with GTR I
would agree was poor, but based on the older engine it was as good as any of
the ISI games from the old version.  I have heard nothing but positive
reviews about the multi and rfactor also has 16 as a recommended limit
although it can be tweaked(as can GTL).
The level of detail in the Simbin games/sims blows rFactor out of the
water(not trying to knock it, I bought it).  I hold out hope for good mods,
but most of those modders won't have close to the access that simbin has
with the FIA.  As for patches, I haven't heard of a great need yet, although
I see a couple of the Bliimey guys on RSC helping with tips now.  Who really
knows how that will work out, I sure don't.

Chad

--
Chad Rogers
Hospital Account Manager
P&G Pharmaceuticals
(206)368-3582
(206)963-2036 cell



>> WRONG!!  Which bugs do you feel have carried over to GTL from GTR, I'd
>> love to hear them.  Legends uses the Gmotor2 and it has been stated that
>> the G is for graphics and rFactor uses the same motor/engine.

> yep,  GTLegends only uses the rFactor graphics engine, every other thing
> (including multiplayer&physics engine) is the same as in GTR. Calling
> those as basically the same is wrong, because graphics only make a part of
> a game engine... Then again, it is how the user sees/feels it that counts.
> If the user only sees the graphics, thats fine to me.... but a game
> experince has to do with physics and multiplayer as well.

> I haven't personally played the release version of GTLegends, but judging
> from what I've heard, the multiplayer is currently just as buggy as it was
> in GTR  (and still is, and I'll bet that there will be no more patches as
> 90% of the GTR/GTL dev people have now left Simbin...). I'm about to give
> GTLegends a fair chance when my cousin buys it, though :)

> --
> Mika Takala

Jeff Rei

Most realistic sim today?

by Jeff Rei » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:19:44

After thinking about this for a while, the winner is Simpson's Hit and Run.
No other simulation does as good a job of simulating the cars it models,
but don't take my word for it, here's a video of a lap around Springfield:

http://jeffareid.net/cgi-bin/hnr.wmv

ymenar

Most realistic sim today?

by ymenar » Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:34:17


> After thinking about this for a while, the winner is Simpson's Hit and
> Run.
> No other simulation does as good a job of simulating the cars it models,
> but don't take my word for it, here's a video of a lap around Springfield:

    H&R was a very frustrating experience actually driving those cars, but
it was indeed very fun in every other aspect of the game.  It's not
realistic at all, please don't think we will take yourself any seriously
when you write such things.  It's a great *** experience that has high
points for immersion and the sheer quirky factor of the environments.  Not
for the realism of car behavior that we discuss about here.  This is a SIM
newsgroup, many games that you have on your video websites aren't discussed
about here, because well we don't care about them.  Newsgroups like
c.s.i.p.g.a are for that.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.