> Jonny......you are looking in the 31 bracket for a graphic card upgrade...?
> Where in UK are you...?
anti-static bag and a thick Jiffy bag, I'd have thought...
Email me - you'll need to take the capitals out of my reply
address.
Jonny
> Where in UK are you...?
Email me - you'll need to take the capitals out of my reply
address.
Jonny
> Excellent, thank you Goy!
> I've just done a quick ranking exercise on the 533/500 results,
> and it looks like the GF2 Pro 400 and the GF2 MX come top (the
> MX is better at 533, the Pro at 400) followed by the GF DDR and
> the GF 256. The V5 is the only non-GF card in contention!
> From that, maybe a GF4 MX might just make sense - perhaps with
> a look at some mild overclocking...
And you're not alone in not having a top end system either
http://valve.speakeasy.net/
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
http://www.theuspits.com
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
> I say this is a terrible purchase. It's precisely what nvidia's
> marketing department want you to do: blow money on a marginal increase,
> thereby forcing you to upgrade yet again in 6months. If you insist on
> buying nvidia products, at least get a 4200 or better.
thanks for the reply. I bought the card anyway, but it went to
replace an old V3 2000 in my son's *** machine. It was
impossible to install in my games box, so he shelled out the
money (the price is still ok imho).
He's a happy warcraft III player now, performance of the gf4mx
is much better (if only because it has 4X the RAM of the voodoo
;-)
Cheers & thanks again for all your comments,
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61