If there's one person who can say they don't look better than N2003, I'll
quit sim racing forever right now. :-)
--
David G Fisher
I don't understand the complaints about the graphics either.
Not only that but I am even enjoying the driving.
But then again I don't even mind the "draft guage" so that probably
disqualifies my opinions.
Elrikk ;o)
1600x1200 32 70hz?
--
David G Fisher
> 1600x1200 32 70hz?
> > I've read quite a few posts at this and other forums form people saying
> > the
> > NSR graphics are poor, but they don't post any screenshots from their
> > system. Graphics look great on mine with a 9700Pro 4xAA and 4x
> > anisotropic.
> > I've uploaded a zip file with some screenshots to
> > http://www.eagleloans.com/download
> > If there's one person who can say they don't look better than N2003,
I'll
> > quit sim racing forever right now. :-)
> > --
> > David G Fisher
I run with the wheel and hands off too. Too distracting. One set is enough
:)
-Larry
> I run with the wheel and hands off too. Too distracting. One set is enough
> :)
> -Larry
>>I don't understand the complaints about the graphics either.
>>Not only that but I am even enjoying the driving.
>>But then again I don't even mind the "draft guage" so that probably
>>disqualifies my opinions.
>>Elrikk ;o)
I don't care for the look of ISI's graphics be it F1, NSR, or rFactor. IMO
it gives a cartoonish look to the cars. At one time I had a set of track
textures for F1 that was using a different color pallatte and that help a
bunch. If NSR is as easy to replace paint jobs as NR2003 then I'm sure the
"aftermarket" painters will take care of that.
I won't say that Papy's look is better, but it is my personal choice. So
feel free to keep racing :)
MadDAWG
MadDAWG
That's more than double I could get with Papy's N2003 demo similarly setup
woweee!
Alan
Intel 3.2Ghz
9800Pro
1Gb matched DDR400 ram
