rec.autos.simulators

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

To help illustrate the level of panic now in full swing within the US
government, we have this:

====================

"The NRC has determined that if the agency were to address Y2K issues
affecting plant operability within the existing regulatory framework and
procedures, continued safe operation of the facility could be
unnecessarily adversely impacted, thereby potentially resulting in
adverse impact on public health and safety by forcing an unnecessary
plant shutdown. NRC approval for relief from a technical specification
or license condition under current practices for notification of
enforcement discretion would be too cumbersome and unworkable  iven the
desire for prompt action if the licensee determines that continued safe
plant operation is possible."

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

====================

There are 108 nuclear power plants in the US. None are beyond the first
stage (10%) of remediation (inventory of problems).

The NRC has mandated the automatic shutdown of any plant which does not
PROVE compliance by 6/1/99.  That is 6 months before the actual rollover
date.  Why 6 months?  Because it takes 6 months for core materials to
safely cool (requiring electrical power).  So if a plant can't prove
compliance in time to have our power grid up an minimum of the 6 months
required, then it's too risky.

Read the above snippet. The NRC realizes it's too late for nukes to make
the laughable 6/1/99 deadline, so they have decided that the personal
safety of nearby residents of these plants isn't as important producing
electrical power. The NRC will drop the "existing regulatory framework"
of safety guidelines so they can keep the power on.

This is an outrage.  Yet the public will know nothing about this
incredible breach of responsiblity until the inevitable happens.

First, the Dept. of Defense TWICE falsifies Y2K compliance certificates
for our nuclear warhead and missiles.  And now this.

We are not talking about a welfare program or save-the-whales cause.

Go ahead and believe Koskinen when he says the basic infrastructure will
hold.  And that we are 'on-track' - "it's the other countries that are
behind".  Don't prepare and stay in the city.  Everything will be all
right in the end.

Rick

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> Rick, do you ever race a simulator?  Or get laid?

That's very *subtle* of you to present it as a choice.  Does your wife
lock you out in protest of your GPL ***ion? <g>

Rick - who raced on TEN for 8 months until he decided REAL racecars
don't have doors.

Paul Jone

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Paul Jone » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Revved,
don't take the bait, mate. Once this guy is launched only a nuke will stop
him ranting,
Paul

> On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:40:50 -0600,


> >To help illustrate the level of panic now in full swing within the US
> >government, we have this:

> [snip]

> Rick, do you ever race a simulator?
> Or get laid?

> --
> (  rrevved is at mindspring dot com
> (  post in haste, repent at your leisure

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> He has nothing to say about sims, which is the reason I use this newsgroup.

Y2K has much to do with simulation software and you.  Nearly everyone is
blind to the *fact* that Y2K is the single event that will make their
auto simulation fun cease to exist sometime between now and 010100.

A few such as myself can see into the future beyond arm's length and are
preparing for this event, and therefore will continue enjoying auto
racing simulators long after the birth of the post-information age.

Long live privatized technology!

Rick

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> Revved,
> don't take the bait, mate. Once this guy is launched only a nuke will stop
> him ranting,

Paul is this what you mean't by "being ready" for the rollover at your
bank?

========================================

Issue date: 10 December 1998 Article source: Computer Weekly News

Banks hit by two-day network date failure.

The installation of millennium-compliant
software by a telecommunications supplier left dozens of London
investment
banks and brokers suffering from a network failure at the end of last
month.
Their Colt-run telecommunications network failed when the software
installation led to transmission on 25 out of 300 fibre optic rings
failing,
said a Colt spokesman.

Mercury Asset Management and Tokyo Mitsubishi International were among
those
affected by the almost two-day failure, with market data services
provided by
Reuters and Bloomberg also affected.

Users of the Colt network had previously been told such a failure was
unlikely, as the supplier had said any breakdown to any part of the
network
would be over- ridden by emergency back-up procedures, but this time
they did
not work.

=======================================
http://www.computerweekly.co.uk/cwarchive/news/19981210/cwcontainer.a...
(free registration)

Don't you guys even bother to test the software before putting it
online?

Sheesh.

Rick

Rob

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Rob » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Hey Rick, relax...  everything is going to be just fine.   ***space will
not come to a crashing halt Jan 1, 2000.   Now, back to the TOPIC at
hand....

>On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:39:24 +0000,


>>Revved,
>>don't take the bait, mate. Once this guy is launched only a nuke will stop
>>him ranting,
>>Paul

>That's probably very good advice. I am going to plonk
>him, and this thread after I finish this post. He has nothing
>to say about sims, which is the reason I use this newsgroup.
>He is off-topic and has been in that mode for quite some time.

>Thanks for helping me see the light.. :)


>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 00:40:50 -0600,


>>> >To help illustrate the level of panic now in full swing within the US
>>> >government, we have this:

>>> [snip]

>>> Rick, do you ever race a simulator?
>>> Or get laid?

>--
>(  rrevved is at mindspring dot com
>(  post in haste, repent at your leisure

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> Hey Rick, relax...  everything is going to be just fine.   ***space will not come to a crashing halt Jan 1, 2000.

Sounds good.  I guess that means 75% of all US companies (which gross
less than 50 million dollar per year) who HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO GET
STARTED are *not* involved in keeping up the infrastructure of
***space.

Rick

Jo

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Jo » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00


>A few such as myself can see into the future ...

And I thought only guys like Moses and Jesus could do that (and maybe
Nostradamus). Thanks for the correction.

Joe

Ben Farnema

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Ben Farnema » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

So, Rick, you think you'll be the only one able to play sims after the
century turn...Now I get what this has to do with sims.  You think that if
you talk about "doomsday" enough, you will save the sim world.  In that
case, I'd better read all your posts.



>> He has nothing to say about sims, which is the reason I use this
newsgroup.

>Y2K has much to do with simulation software and you.  Nearly everyone is
>blind to the *fact* that Y2K is the single event that will make their
>auto simulation fun cease to exist sometime between now and 010100.

>A few such as myself can see into the future beyond arm's length and are
>preparing for this event, and therefore will continue enjoying auto
>racing simulators long after the birth of the post-information age.

>Long live privatized technology!

>Rick

Ben Farnema

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Ben Farnema » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Joe, you forgot David Koresh...


>>A few such as myself can see into the future ...

>And I thought only guys like Moses and Jesus could do that (and maybe
>Nostradamus). Thanks for the correction.

>Joe

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00



> >A few such as myself can see into the future ...

> And I thought only guys like Moses and Jesus could do that (and maybe
> Nostradamus). Thanks for the correction.

When you are tied to railroad tracks with a train coming, I would hardly
characterize yourself as a "futurist" by stating you are about to die.

You support my arguments by forgoing any intelligent rebuttal and taking
my comments out of context al la Clintonesque'.

Thank you.

Rick

John Walla

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by John Walla » Sun, 13 Dec 1998 04:00:00

On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:39:24 +0000, Paul Jones


>Revved,
>don't take the bait, mate. Once this guy is launched only a nuke will stop
>him ranting,

Hell, that won't work. Damn nuke will probably fail it's Y2K
compliancy test or some such...

Cheers!
John

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Sun, 13 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> Hell, that won't work. Damn nuke will probably fail it's Y2K
> compliancy test or some such...

You got something right for a change.

Rick

Jeff Vince

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by Jeff Vince » Mon, 14 Dec 1998 04:00:00

On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:43:13 -0700, "Ben Farneman"


>So, Rick, you think you'll be the only one able to play sims after the
>century turn...

   OK, so Rick's smarter than all of us and will be sim-racing
post-010100...

   My question is, who's he gonna race online with?...  ;)

"But in a way, fear is a big part of racing, because if there was
nothing to be frightened of, and no limit, any fool could get into
a motor car and racing would not exist as a sport." -- Jim Clark

ric

Y2K stuff* - and nukes

by ric » Mon, 14 Dec 1998 04:00:00


>    OK, so Rick's smarter than all of us and will be sim-racing
> post-010100...

Or better prepared maybe?

Who says you have to be online to race multiplayer?

Rick

"be prepared"   -Boy Scouts of America


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.