You heard wrong on your SwapFile. Of course there are the sites that say
1.5x, 2.5x, 3.0x and almost any multiplier you can pull out of thin air.
Which is where most of these multipliers come from. The only setting that
has a historical basis on
anything is 2.5x and that's the initial starting point for tuning a
multi-user Unix system. 98/Me is *not* Unix and has a completely different
set of algorithms for management virtual memory.
To show graphically the fatal flaw behind any of these multipliers, consider
the following using 2x.
2x32M = 64M swapfile
2x128M = 256M swapfile
2x256M = 512M swapfile
2x512M = 1G swapfile.
Does it make any sense to you that a system with 32M of memory requires a
smaller swapfile to run than a system with 512M of memory?
Never set a maximum on the size of the swap file unless you enjoy sluggish
performance and playing Russian roulette with your data.You can set a
minimum by using System Monitor to watch "Swapfile Size" for a while, and at
least once load your system up and run several programs at once to simulate
your system's highest stress level. Then take the largest "Swapfile Size"
you've seen, add a little more to it, then set this as your minimum swapfile
size.A minimum is a reasonably good idea. It'll help keep files from
getting fragmented if they're on the same drive as the swapfile. It may
help performance slightly.
You can read more and get a good understanding of how Windows **truly**
handles memory here.
http://www.aumha.org/a/memmgmt.htm
--
Nas1
SNIP.............................
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----