Rick,
This is the same monitor that Apple was selling, and one was listed at
12ms, and one was listed as 16ms.. so if you can figure that out for
me, let me know! ;)
Honestly, I've had absolutely no problem with ghosting or blurring.
GTL, rfactor, HL2, BF2, BF2:SF, Call of Duty 2, CivIV, CS:Source, etc.
They all look fantastic on it IMHO.
Now, there is some back light bleed through in the corners of the
screen, but you only notice that on a really dark screen. For instance,
the only time I notice it is when the all black WindowsXP screen saver
kicks on.
Honestly, I want another one for my other PC. I'm 100% satisfied with
the purchase so far. No dead pixels, and I did pay a little extra for
an extended warranty, but that was just something I felt comfortable
doing since I've never owned an LCD up to this point other than a
notebook.
This monitor also allows you to rotate into portrait mode if you so
desire by rotating the whole screen. I've used various devices on the
USB ports with no problems so far as well just as an FYI.
I'm not saying its the best LCD out there, I'm not saying that it's the
best color reproduction or the best brightness or anything as I believe
those are subjective. What I'm comfortable saying is that I've had no
problems with ghosting, blurring, or tearing in any way, shape, or form.
So yes, I can recommend it without any reservations. I did quite a bit
of research on this monitor prior to buying it over on RSC, Anandtech,
and a few other forums. Not many complaints to be found and only a
couple of people commented on the back light issue, which I was
expecting but is much less significant than I thought it might be.
So I'm now done sounding like a Dell commercial!
Scott
>>I just bought a Dell 2005FPW Widescreen LCD and absolutely love it. I
>>paid $396.00 about a month ago. (It's currently $423.20) I mostly run
>>rFactor & GTL and have had no problems with ghosting, etc.
> Hi Scott,
> I know you've already answered it in the quote above, but I'm in the market
> for a monitor and was interested in the description you gave. I've looked
> around at various review sites and all list this monitor as having as 16ms
> response time. Now I know that some manufacturers and sites use different
> benchmarks to shave this statistic, but everything I've read so far has said
> don't look at anything above 8ms for racing. So, really no problems...really
> ok for racing?
> Regards
> Rick.
--
Scott B. Husted?
http://www.Husted.cc
ICQ# - 4395450 | AIM - Hylander12871 | Yahoo - sbhusted